Hi,
Mon, 18 Nov 2002 06:28:37 +0900,
Hajimu UMEMOTO [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Sun, 17 Nov 2002 12:35:41 -0500
Lawrence Greenfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
leg+ We'd like to get IPv6 support into 2.2. Would it be possible for you to
leg+ create your patch against the 2.2 branch in CVS?
ume
what they used.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Dennis K
Sent: Saturday, November 16, 2002 6:25 PM
To: 'Oleksandr Firsov'
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Cyrus IMAPd 2.1.10 Released
Correct me if I'm wrong, SGML and XML were
--On Saturday, November 16, 2002 2:10 PM +0900 Hajimu UMEMOTO
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, 13 Nov 2002 15:57:57 -0500 (EST)
Rob Siemborski [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rjs3 I'm pleased to announce the release of Cyrus IMAPd 2.1.10. This is
mostly rjs3 a bug-fix and cleanup release, with
Hi,
On Sun, 17 Nov 2002 12:35:41 -0500
Lawrence Greenfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
leg+ We'd like to get IPv6 support into 2.2. Would it be possible for you to
leg+ create your patch against the 2.2 branch in CVS?
Oh, it's a great news! Okay, though my patch is against the 2.1 and I
didn't
I believe a set of plaintext documentation can be maintained with RCS,
CVS or SCCS without problems by a distanced dev team, while XSLT will
require proper usage by the author manuals etc...
Yep. The reality is it's not us who chose the doc tools, but the people
who actually update the doco.
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Oleksandr
Firsov
Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 9:56 AM
To: Rob Siemborski; Andrew McNamara
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Cyrus IMAPd 2.1.10 Released
Guys/girls What do You talking about?
doc tool, LaTex, etc... That is stone age terms.
I am not familiar
On 15 Nov 2002, Erik Enge wrote:
Then again, LaTex (or SGML) would probably give you the most
possibilities (and problems ;).
Right, as does HTML (atleast, for our intents and purposes), without the
overhead of having to learn a new toolset and language (or the complexity
of LaTeX).
I guess
Rob Siemborski [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It's really hard to keep formatted in any way that looks reasoanble.
I would say that your editor should take care of that (for me, Emacs
does an excellent job).
There's also the fact that markup languages let you embed hyperlinks,
etc.
Did you
: Andrew McNamara [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Rob Siemborski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 9:44 PM
Subject: Re: Cyrus IMAPd 2.1.10 Released
I feel that moving back to only plaintext is a step backwards. I don't
know much about SGML myself, so I'm not sure I'd
On Fri, 15 Nov 2002, Scott Adkins wrote:
Actually, I develop all my documentation in HTML as well. I still produce
PDF and PS documents as well. How I acommplish this is that I use IE, go
to the documented HTML web page, select a printer and print, select the
little checkbox to SAVE TO
--On Friday, November 15, 2002 9:36 AM -0500 Rob Siemborski
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 15 Nov 2002, Erik Enge wrote:
Then again, LaTex (or SGML) would probably give you the most
possibilities (and problems ;).
Right, as does HTML (atleast, for our intents and purposes), without the
overhead
- Original Message -
From: Rob Siemborski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Scott Adkins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 10:07 AM
Subject: Re: Cyrus IMAPd 2.1.10 Released
On Fri, 15 Nov 2002, Scott Adkins wrote:
Actually, I develop all my
.
Perfect example is Letter size(USA) versus A4(Europe).
SunS
- Original Message -
From: Rob Siemborski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Scott Adkins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 10:07 AM
Subject: Re: Cyrus IMAPd 2.1.10 Released
On Fri, 15 Nov 2002
On Thursday 14 November 2002 14:43 pm, Scott Russell wrote:
On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 02:35:02PM -0500, Lawrence Greenfield wrote:
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 10:56:07 -0500
From: Scott Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[...]
Sooo... any reason why the docs aren't sgml and then built for text,
On Fri, 15 Nov 2002, Oleksandr Firsov wrote:
I am not familiar with product discussed above, but for structured data
exist de-facto standard which used for such purposes.
For structured documentation, the de-facto standard is the DocBook schema
(there are SGML, and XML incarnations of it).
See
Hi,
On Wed, 13 Nov 2002 15:57:57 -0500 (EST)
Rob Siemborski [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rjs3 I'm pleased to announce the release of Cyrus IMAPd 2.1.10. This is mostly
rjs3 a bug-fix and cleanup release, with the notable new feature of Berkeley DB
rjs3 4.1 support.
My IPv6 patch for Cyrus IMAPd
On Thu, 14 Nov 2002, Scott Russell wrote:
One of the documentation changes appears to remove a bunch of key
instructions from the /doc/text/install-configure file. Everything
after step 8. appears to be gone in the 2.1.10 release. I don't think
this was intentional since it looks like there
On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 03:57:57PM -0500, Rob Siemborski wrote:
I'm pleased to announce the release of Cyrus IMAPd 2.1.10. This is mostly
a bug-fix and cleanup release, with the notable new feature of Berkeley DB
4.1 support.
One of the documentation changes appears to remove a bunch of key
On Thu, 14 Nov 2002, Rob Siemborski wrote:
I'll look into what's going on, but the HTML version is correct.
htmlstrip (our html-to-plaintext converter) apparently didn't support
quot, which a recent update to install-configure added, we missed it
because failure to build the text directory
On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 10:37:50AM -0500, Rob Siemborski wrote:
On Thu, 14 Nov 2002, Rob Siemborski wrote:
I'll look into what's going on, but the HTML version is correct.
I've fixed both of these issues. You can pull an updated source for
htmlstrip.c from cvs now, but since the
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 10:56:07 -0500
From: Scott Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[...]
Sooo... any reason why the docs aren't sgml and then built for text,
html, ps, etc? Think of this as less of a request and more of 'would
CMU be interested' type question. :)
No objections, but it's
On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 02:35:02PM -0500, Lawrence Greenfield wrote:
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 10:56:07 -0500
From: Scott Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[...]
Sooo... any reason why the docs aren't sgml and then built for text,
html, ps, etc? Think of this as less of a request and more of
Lawrence Greenfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If someone has a good idea of how to make the documentation easier to
deal with, we're all for it.
What's wrong with plain text?
Erik.
On 14 Nov 2002, Erik Enge wrote:
What's wrong with plain text?
It's really hard to keep formatted in any way that looks reasoanble.
For example, say you have a bulleted list (or an ordered list, both of
which we have throughout our documentation)
You probably want it to look something like:
I feel that moving back to only plaintext is a step backwards. I don't
know much about SGML myself, so I'm not sure I'd want to be stuck
maintaining that, but it sounds interesting enough (and it would be nice
to have general tools for keeping the documentation formatted, instead of
worrying when
I'm pleased to announce the release of Cyrus IMAPd 2.1.10. This is mostly
a bug-fix and cleanup release, with the notable new feature of Berkeley DB
4.1 support.
Full details are available in doc/changes.html file that is included in
the distribution.
As always, the distribution is available
26 matches
Mail list logo
