On Fri, 2010-12-31 at 09:37 +0100, Simon Matter wrote:
> The other big question is how to handle the missing autocreate feature. I
> have hoped that this will be integrated into 2.4.x but as it seems now it
> will not be there and I don't really know what to do about it. All those
> running our RPM
Hallo Simon,
--On 31. Dezember 2010 09:37:31 +0100 Simon Matter
wrote:
I've been working on the 2.4.x RPM's recently but they have not been
tested. I want to make sure that upgrades will work as smooth as they have
always been and this requires quite a lot of tests with different
scenarios.
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 09:37:31AM +0100, Simon Matter wrote:
> > Simon,
> >
> >> Of course I'll update our RHEL/CentOS RPMs but it may take a bit more
> >> time
> >> than the usual hours or days because of the many changes in the new
> >> release. Some of the stuff which has been done in the RPM a
> Simon,
>
>> Of course I'll update our RHEL/CentOS RPMs but it may take a bit more
>> time
>> than the usual hours or days because of the many changes in the new
>> release. Some of the stuff which has been done in the RPM automagically
>> -
>> like converting databases on startup - has now been i
Simon,
> Of course I'll update our RHEL/CentOS RPMs but it may take a bit more time
> than the usual hours or days because of the many changes in the new
> release. Some of the stuff which has been done in the RPM automagically -
> like converting databases on startup - has now been integrated in
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 05:05:35PM +0200, Simon Matter wrote:
> When I looked a bit closer it seems like the clean shutdown patch has made
> it into 2.4 so it not an issue anymore.
>
> But, is there any news on the autocreate feature?
We need to knuckle down and make sure it works under murder, t
> On Wed, 13 Oct 2010, Simon Matter wrote:
>
>> Of course I'll update our RHEL/CentOS RPMs but it may take a bit more
>> time
>> than the usual hours or days because of the many changes in the new
>> release. Some of the stuff which has been done in the RPM automagically
>> -
>> like converting dat
On Wed, 13 Oct 2010, Simon Matter wrote:
> Of course I'll update our RHEL/CentOS RPMs but it may take a bit more time
> than the usual hours or days because of the many changes in the new
> release. Some of the stuff which has been done in the RPM automagically -
> like converting databases on sta
Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
> On 10/13/10 18:44, Simon Matter wrote:
> >> Simon Matter wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 02:23:18PM -0700, David Lang wrote:
> (...)
>
> > IIRC autocreate is on the official todo list, isn't it? That would solve
> > it forever.
> >
> > Simon
>
> Excuse m
On 10/13/10 18:44, Simon Matter wrote:
>> Simon Matter wrote:
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 02:23:18PM -0700, David Lang wrote:
(...)
>
> IIRC autocreate is on the official todo list, isn't it? That would solve
> it forever.
>
> Simon
Excuse my ignorance, but where can I find the Official
> Simon Matter wrote:
>> > On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 02:23:18PM -0700, David Lang wrote:
>> >> I'm happy to see this.
>> >>
>> >> Is there anyone packaging this up for the common linux distros?
>> >>
>> >> David Lang
>> >
>> > We're planning to reach out to the distributions and convince them
>> > to
On Wed, 13 Oct 2010, Frank Pittel wrote:
; Thanks for your build script. I'll give it a try when I get home. Some of the
lacations
; of things like sasl and burkley db are in different locations but that
shouldn't be
; an issue. I forgot to mention that I'm running sol-10 on x86.
btw, now that
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 09:04:45AM +, Andy Fiddaman wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 12 Oct 2010, Frank Pittel wrote:
> ; > >
> ; > > Any chance of getting a package for solaris 10? I've been trying to
> build 2.3.16 for over
> ; > > a week and still haven't gotten it to compile.
> ; >
> ; > I really do
On Tue, 12 Oct 2010, Frank Pittel wrote:
; > >
; > > Any chance of getting a package for solaris 10? I've been trying to build
2.3.16 for over
; > > a week and still haven't gotten it to compile.
; >
; > I really don't know much about Solaris 10 packaging. I do have a Solaris
; > box though...
Simon Matter wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 02:23:18PM -0700, David Lang wrote:
> >> I'm happy to see this.
> >>
> >> Is there anyone packaging this up for the common linux distros?
> >>
> >> David Lang
> >
> > We're planning to reach out to the distributions and convince them
> > to package
> On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 02:23:18PM -0700, David Lang wrote:
>> I'm happy to see this.
>>
>> Is there anyone packaging this up for the common linux distros?
>>
>> David Lang
>
> We're planning to reach out to the distributions and convince them
> to package it - as well as integrating any patches
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 09:14:22PM -0400, Bron Gondwana wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 06:21:19PM -0500, Frank Pittel wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 06:50:03PM -0400, Bron Gondwana wrote:
> > > On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 02:23:18PM -0700, David Lang wrote:
> > > > I'm happy to see this.
> > > >
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 06:21:19PM -0500, Frank Pittel wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 06:50:03PM -0400, Bron Gondwana wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 02:23:18PM -0700, David Lang wrote:
> > > I'm happy to see this.
> > >
> > > Is there anyone packaging this up for the common linux distros?
>
David Lang wrote:
> I'm happy to see this.
>
> Is there anyone packaging this up for the common linux distros?
>
Yes, I am.
Packages will be / are available through http://mirror.kolabsys.com/pub/
Look at the kolab-3.0 product branch repositories, where what is now still
called kolab-cyrus-im
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 06:50:03PM -0400, Bron Gondwana wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 02:23:18PM -0700, David Lang wrote:
> > I'm happy to see this.
> >
> > Is there anyone packaging this up for the common linux distros?
> >
> > David Lang
>
> We're planning to reach out to the distributions
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 02:23:18PM -0700, David Lang wrote:
> I'm happy to see this.
>
> Is there anyone packaging this up for the common linux distros?
>
> David Lang
We're planning to reach out to the distributions and convince them
to package it - as well as integrating any patches they're ap
cmu.edu, cyrus-de...@lists.andrew.cmu.edu,
> cyrus-proj...@lists.andrew.cmu.edu
> Subject: Cyrus IMAPd 2.4.0 Released
>
> I am pleased to announce the release of Cyrus IMAPd 2.4.0. This
> release should be considered production quality but hasn't yet been
> widely tested. Major
I am pleased to announce the release of Cyrus IMAPd 2.4.0. This
release should be considered production quality but hasn't yet been
widely tested. Major changes in the release are the following:
- All databases are now skiplist by default
- Charset subsystem has been rewritten - Unicode 5.2 and
23 matches
Mail list logo
