Cyrus logging informational messages with too high priority?

2002-10-30 Thread Erik Enge
Hi. The following error message seem to be at warn (syslog priority) or above: Oct 30 14:24:57 myhost imapd[12489]: idle for too long, closing connection Shouldn't this be only an info, or is it really a warning that something is about to go wrong (which how I think of warnings)? The other

Re: Cyrus logging informational messages with too high priority?

2002-10-30 Thread Rob Siemborski
On 30 Oct 2002, Erik Enge wrote: The following error message seem to be at warn (syslog priority) or above: Oct 30 14:24:57 myhost imapd[12489]: idle for too long, closing connection Shouldn't this be only an info, or is it really a warning that something is about to go wrong (which how

Re: Cyrus logging informational messages with too high priority?

2002-10-30 Thread Rob Siemborski
On 30 Oct 2002, Erik Enge wrote: Rob Siemborski [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: It could probably go to LOG_INFO. Is this a configuration option I can adujust? Or can I recompile Cyrus to use info instead? It's in imap/imapd.c, near the top of cmdloop(). If you're using Berkeley DB 4

Re: Cyrus logging informational messages with too high priority?

2002-10-30 Thread Erik Enge
Rob Siemborski [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: It could probably go to LOG_INFO. Is this a configuration option I can adujust? Or can I recompile Cyrus to use info instead? If you're using Berkeley DB 4 there's a bug in the locker counting code that causes this number to not be decremented, so

Re: Cyrus logging informational messages with too high priority?

2002-10-30 Thread Erik Enge
Rob Siemborski [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: It's in imap/imapd.c, near the top of cmdloop(). Will this be fixed in the next release? Keep in mind that this won't make them entirely go away, since Berkeley is still the prefered database for duplicate.db and tls_cache.db. And they *are* a

Re: Cyrus logging informational messages with too high priority?

2002-10-30 Thread Rob Siemborski
On 30 Oct 2002, Erik Enge wrote: I'm not sure I understand. Does that mean I cannot use --with-duplicate-db and --with-tls-db as skiplist? Will Berkley DB still be used? You can, it's just not a great idea performance-wise (skiplist is more optimized towards enumeration operatons than

Re: Cyrus logging informational messages with too high priority?

2002-10-30 Thread Rob Siemborski
On 30 Oct 2002, Erik Enge wrote: You can, it's just not a great idea performance-wise (skiplist is more optimized towards enumeration operatons than random access). Keeping in mind that I will have about 50 users that access their mailboxes all day, would I notice any performance impact of

Re: Cyrus logging informational messages with too high priority?

2002-10-30 Thread Erik Enge
Rob Siemborski [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: You can, it's just not a great idea performance-wise (skiplist is more optimized towards enumeration operatons than random access). Keeping in mind that I will have about 50 users that access their mailboxes all day, would I notice any performance

Re: Cyrus logging informational messages with too high priority?

2002-10-30 Thread Erik Enge
Rob Siemborski [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: That depends on a number of things. mailboxes.db should be skiplist for performance reasons anyway. What is skiplist? Is the code included in Cyrus? Thanks, Erik.

Re: Cyrus logging informational messages with too high priority?

2002-10-30 Thread Rob Siemborski
On 30 Oct 2002, Erik Enge wrote: Rob Siemborski [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: That depends on a number of things. mailboxes.db should be skiplist for performance reasons anyway. What is skiplist? Is the code included in Cyrus? It's a database format that we wrote to do fast enumarations,