On Wed, Aug 01, 2001 at 09:10:03AM -0500, Amos Gouaux wrote:
te [EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]
Well, I've got a whole ton of these in our virtual maps and they
work just peachy. You might want to double check that '+' is the
'recipient_delimiter'.
Sorry about the
On Wed, 1 Aug 2001 15:43:15 +0200,
Terje Elde [EMAIL PROTECTED] (te) writes:
te [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Well, I've got a whole ton of these in our virtual maps and they
work just peachy. You might want to double check that '+' is the
'recipient_delimiter'.
Hi,
I've got a rather amusing setup. Basically I've though of the idea to use
spamcops commercial email filtering service for what I think might be spam,
thus I can allow myself a much more aggressive filtering, and just loop what
my filter things might be spam through them.
This happens by my
It's typical... You spend a few hours trying to get something right, then you
contact others who might know better, and withing minutes find a way to make
it work...
On Tue, Jul 31, 2001 at 11:31:08PM +0200, Terje Elde wrote:
I suspect this might be a product of the duplicate delivery system,
On Wed, 1 Aug 2001 00:12:49 +0200,
Terje Elde [EMAIL PROTECTED] (te) writes:
te Also let me note that there seem to be a limitation in postfix. You can't
te remap a + expanded username in the virtual file, which is fair enough I
How do you mean?
--
Amos
