Scott Adkins wrote:
--On Monday, September 26, 2005 6:45 PM +0200 David
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
I have a 'pseudo' High Availability SMTP system consisting in two
servers
running cyrus 2.2.5.
The main problem I have is that only one of the two nodes can access
to the
mailboxes i
On Wed, 2005-09-28 at 13:45 -0400, Ken Murchison wrote:
> I haven't tried it, but I've done nothing to purposely break replication
> of virtdomains.
I might give it a try and report back then.
Thanks,
--
Brad Crotchett, RHCE
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cyrus Home Page: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyr
David Carter wrote:
On Wed, 28 Sep 2005, brad wrote:
I read the documentation on replication and am interested in trying
it. I have several servers that run a single domain, but are using
virtdomain anyway. I would like to have one virtdomain replica server
that serves as a hot spare to all
João Assad wrote:
brad wrote:
On Tue, 2005-09-27 at 08:51 +0800, Ow Mun Heng wrote:
On Mon, 2005-09-26 at 10:03 -0700, Aaron Glenn wrote:
On 9/26/05, David <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is there any way to achieve this goal using cyrus? Which is the
best approach
to this scenari
On Wed, 28 Sep 2005, brad wrote:
I read the documentation on replication and am interested in trying it.
I have several servers that run a single domain, but are using
virtdomain anyway. I would like to have one virtdomain replica server
that serves as a hot spare to all of these servers. In
On Wed, 2005-09-28 at 12:41 -0300, João Assad wrote:
> >
> I too am very interested in this replication solution. Where can I get
> the src and documentation ?
>
> Regards,
>
> João Assad
>
This is a good start:
http://www-uxsup.csx.cam.ac.uk/~dpc22/cyrus/replication.html
Thanks,
--
Bra
On Wed, 2005-09-28 at 09:02 +0100, David Carter wrote:
> We use the replication engine all the time to move users back and forth
> between systems so that we can patch and upgrade operating systems and/or
> Cyrus without any user visible downtime.
I read the documentation on replication and am
brad wrote:
On Tue, 2005-09-27 at 08:51 +0800, Ow Mun Heng wrote:
On Mon, 2005-09-26 at 10:03 -0700, Aaron Glenn wrote:
On 9/26/05, David <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is there any way to achieve this goal using cyrus? Which is the best approach
to this scenario? Run daily imapsync
On Tue, 2005-09-27 at 08:51 +0800, Ow Mun Heng wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-09-26 at 10:03 -0700, Aaron Glenn wrote:
> > On 9/26/05, David <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Is there any way to achieve this goal using cyrus? Which is the best
> > > approach
> > > to this scenario? Run daily imapsync via cr
On Tue, 27 Sep 2005, Patrick Radtke wrote:
We made great use of it Monday morning when one of our backend machines
failed. Switching to the replica was quite simple and relatively fast
(maybe 5 to 10 minutes from deciding to switch to the replica before
replica was fully in action)
We use th
We are running the replication code in production at Columbia.
We made great use of it Monday morning when one of our backend
machines failed.
Switching to the replica was quite simple and relatively fast (maybe
5 to 10 minutes from deciding to switch to the replica before replica
was fully
David Carter wrote:
The complication is that there doesn't appear to be anyone left at CMU
to release new versions of Cyrus at the moment. Poor Jeffrey Eaton seems
to be the last man standing there. My own experience of running things
single handed is that it doesn't leave much time for develo
On Mon, 26 Sep 2005, Aaron Glenn wrote:
There is replication code in the 2.3 branch; though from what I can tell
it hasn't been touched in a few months and makes me wonder if it's being
actively developed still. Nevertheless, in my exhaustive search for any
and all information on IMAP replicat
On Mon, 2005-09-26 at 10:03 -0700, Aaron Glenn wrote:
> On 9/26/05, David <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Is there any way to achieve this goal using cyrus? Which is the best
> > approach
> > to this scenario? Run daily imapsync via cron and a Load Balancer forward
> > the
> > requests to the acti
> Is there any way to achieve this goal using cyrus? Which is the best approach
> to this scenario? Run daily imapsync via cron and a Load Balancer forward the
> requests to the active one?
Here's my approach: setup heartbeat with two ethernet heartbeats, shared storage
(SAN), and pray a bunch tha
--On Monday, September 26, 2005 6:45 PM +0200 David <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
I have a 'pseudo' High Availability SMTP system consisting in two servers
running cyrus 2.2.5.
The main problem I have is that only one of the two nodes can access to the
mailboxes in order to keep the integr
On 9/26/05, David <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there any way to achieve this goal using cyrus? Which is the best approach
> to this scenario? Run daily imapsync via cron and a Load Balancer forward the
> requests to the active one?
>
> Any help would be appreciated.
There is replication code in
Hello,
I have a 'pseudo' High Availability SMTP system consisting in two servers
running cyrus 2.2.5.
The main problem I have is that only one of the two nodes can access to the
mailboxes in order to keep the integrity of the cyrus databases despite the
filesystem (GFS) has support to allow to
18 matches
Mail list logo
