Can you expand on this, like a LOT?
I recall a while ago you brought up some performance issues and
said you had found hacks for them. Were those issues actually unresolved
or are you talking about something else? I don't see any recent posts by
you about problems with your Cyrus install.
I'm
...though, we have seen super-greedyness of ZFS when resilvering. ;)
On Nov 13, 2007, at 09:17, Dale Ghent wrote:
>
> Interesting. What's your kernel patch level?
>
> We're running on 125101-10 with the exact same configuration as you
> (mirrored to two arrays, in separate buildings even) and ha
Interesting. What's your kernel patch level?
We're running on 125101-10 with the exact same configuration as you
(mirrored to two arrays, in separate buildings even) and haven't seen
this problem.
/dale
On Nov 13, 2007, at 1:23 AM, Pascal Gienger wrote:
> Our latency problems went away li
On Tue, 13 Nov 2007, Pascal Gienger wrote:
> Our latency problems went away like a miracle when we detached one half
> of the mirror (so it is no more a mirror).
>
> Read-Rates are doubled (not per device, the total read rate!), latency
> is cut off. No more latency problems.
>
> When attaching
Our latency problems went away like a miracle when we detached one half of
the mirror (so it is no more a mirror).
Read-Rates are doubled (not per device, the total read rate!), latency is
cut off. No more latency problems.
When attaching the volume again, resilvering puts the system to a halt
