Re: MUPDATE master server

2003-03-07 Thread Jared Watkins
No kidding. I'm looking forward to the donation that makes developing that possible. -Rob -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Rob Siemborski * Andrew Systems Group * Cyert Hall 207 * 412-268-7456 Research Systems Programmer * /usr/contributed Gatekeeper Any

Re: MUPDATE master server

2003-03-07 Thread Rob Siemborski
On Fri, 7 Mar 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >Its possible. Make sure you understand that you're doing this for the > >shared namespace though, otherwise you almost certainly want a more > >traditional IMAP proxy like perdition. > > The main advantage that we are interested in is that we would h

Re: MUPDATE master server

2003-03-07 Thread marc . bigler
>Its possible. Make sure you understand that you're doing this for the >shared namespace though, otherwise you almost certainly want a more >traditional IMAP proxy like perdition. The main advantage that we are interested in is that we would have two IMAP connection points for clients located i

Re: MUPDATE master server

2003-03-07 Thread Rob Siemborski
On Fri, 7 Mar 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >So, there's a partial failure, but the majority of the system survives. > > That sounds fine for me. Now I have the current configuration: > > 1 server at a colocation place and a few other servers at a hosting center, > that would be two different ge

Re: MUPDATE master server

2003-03-07 Thread Rob Siemborski
On Fri, 7 Mar 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > What would then happen to mails when the MUPDATE master server goes down ? > Will mail be undelivered and be bounced back ? I would like to avoid the > MUPDATE master server to become the single point of failure. In the event of a mupda

Re: MUPDATE master server

2003-03-07 Thread marc . bigler
Thanks for the answer. I was reading the IMAP Aggregoatr: A Murder of IMAP Servers (ag.html) that's why I didn't find my answer in that document. So if I can only have one single MUPDATE master server the others would be slaves right ? What would then happen to mails when the MUPD

Re: MUPDATE master server

2003-03-07 Thread Rob Siemborski
On Fri, 7 Mar 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I am a bit confused on where should be ran the MUPDATE master server, > should it be running on a Front End server, Back End Server or maybe a > seperate server ? The documentation is not very explicit about this I > think. >From th

MUPDATE master server

2003-03-07 Thread marc . bigler
Hello, I am a bit confused on where should be ran the MUPDATE master server, should it be running on a Front End server, Back End Server or maybe a seperate server ? The documentation is not very explicit about this I think. Also is it possible to have two MUPDATE master servers for redundancy