RE: Mail status

2002-05-23 Thread Russell Packer
-Original Message- From: Gary Mills [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 21 May 2002 19:25 To: Scott M Likens Cc: Luca Olivetti; Russell Packer; Info Cyrus Subject: Re: Mail status On Tue, May 21, 2002 at 11:42:56AM -0600, Scott M Likens wrote: Actually I found the hash incorrect

Re: Mail status

2002-05-23 Thread Gary Mills
On Thu, May 23, 2002 at 09:50:06AM +0100, Russell Packer wrote: Ow. Well thats totally broken things... [cyrus@mailfish cyrus-tools]$ ./rehash -f full converting configuration directory /var/imap...user quota done converting /usr/sieve... fatal error: couldn't move cyrus back! couldn't

Re: Mail status

2002-05-22 Thread Luca Olivetti
Luca Olivetti wrote: Now I switched to using skiplist instead of flat for the seen database and so far it works, but who knows, maybe in a couple of days it'll break again. Didn't have to wait that long :-( Just saw a couple of seen messages reappear as unseen. -- Luca Olivetti

Re: Mail status

2002-05-22 Thread Carsten Burghardt
On Wednesday 22 May 2002 23:50, Luca Olivetti wrote: Luca Olivetti wrote: Now I switched to using skiplist instead of flat for the seen database and so far it works, but who knows, maybe in a couple of days it'll break again. Didn't have to wait that long :-( Just saw a couple of seen

Re: Mail status

2002-05-21 Thread Scott M Likens
Actually I found the hash incorrect for both sieve and cyrus in the user/quota directory's. What i did is patch'd the mkimap and dohash scripts. Attached you'll find what i did, i implemented a FULL hash and found that the directory's created by the scripts were in-adequite for my needs, and

Re: Mail status

2002-05-21 Thread Ken Murchison
Thanks. I'll make sure that I update the correct docs. Ken Gary Mills wrote: On Tue, May 21, 2002 at 02:35:45PM -0400, Ken Murchison wrote: Its been so long since I committed your patches, I don't remember how this stuff works (or is documented). Is the improved hash stuff only

Re: Mail status

2002-05-21 Thread Gary Mills
On Tue, May 21, 2002 at 02:35:45PM -0400, Ken Murchison wrote: Its been so long since I committed your patches, I don't remember how this stuff works (or is documented). Is the improved hash stuff only available as an 'upgrade' via rehash, or can it be used right out of the box on a fresh