Hi,
Simon Matter schrieb:
All three methods worked well. The advantage of HP's Secure Path software
should have been that it also provides load balancing over the two
independant FC paths.
We are also using an EVA3000 in an eight-way-server. When we started to
use it, the HP-provided qla2300-drive
> Hi,
>
> --On 21. Januar 2005 23:57:25 Uhr +0100 Simon Matter
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>> could you please specify the exact kernel versions you are referring
>>> to?
>>> I'm not sure which version update 3 was. We are currently running
>>> 2.4.21-15.0.3.ELsmp. We can't really use a newer v
Hi,
--On 21. Januar 2005 23:57:25 Uhr +0100 Simon Matter
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
could you please specify the exact kernel versions you are referring to?
I'm not sure which version update 3 was. We are currently running
2.4.21-15.0.3.ELsmp. We can't really use a newer version, because we need
Hi Sebastian
Here are the RHEL versions we have used:
vmlinux-2.4.21-15.0.4.ELsmp - good
vmlinux-2.4.21-20.ELsmp - bad
vmlinux-2.4.21-27.0.1.ELsmp - good
2.4.21-20.ELsmp has a bug with file system caching of very large numbers
of files. (generally only occurs with more than 3-4GB of RAM and lots
> Hi,
>
> --On 29. Dezember 2004 5:26:06 Uhr -0600 John Wade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>> One other thing to note, if you are using RHEL 3, be sure to get the
>> latest kernel. There was a bug in the file system caching code in the
>> update 3 that kills any heavily used system with large am
Hi,
--On 29. Dezember 2004 5:26:06 Uhr -0600 John Wade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
One other thing to note, if you are using RHEL 3, be sure to get the
latest kernel. There was a bug in the file system caching code in the
update 3 that kills any heavily used system with large amounts of memory
(li
Hi Anders,
We just completed a migration from 2.0.16 to 2.2.10 and we ended up
using a file system copy with NFS. (two servers, one with 1500 users
and 54 GB of mail, the other with 5,500 users and 15GB of mail) This
is on RHEL 3.0 using Simon's RPM's. (Simon, we can't thank you
enough!)
Yep, I forgot to mention that. I used the administrative user. You
need to make sure that the administrator has access to every mailfolder
on the "from" server which I did by modifying some java that I use to
manage accounts. There is also a perl package, I believe named
IMAP:Admin that you can
On Fri, 24 Dec 2004, Rob Tanner wrote:
half days to complete. But then all I had to do afterwards was move
the alias that points to the imap server and users were bust reading
mail. The other downside is that the SEEN flag is not a property of
the mailbox and doesn't get transfered, so all mail s
Anders,
I went through a similar problem several months ago, updating from an
ESYS server (commercial clone of a 1.x.x Cyrus server). I had all
kinds of incompatibility problems on some test mailboxes I moved over
manually and also manually built the mailboxes file. Some folders
would be okay an
Hiya!
I'm about to upgrade my "old" server to a newer platform, both hardware, O/S
and Cyrus itself are going to be new
versions.
So, how can I ensure that all mail is moved correctly from the old platform to
the new? I have around 3000 accounts
with lots of e-mails stored in the IMAP folders
11 matches
Mail list logo
