Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
And, if I remember it right, it needs a modified cyrus 2.1 to work (i.e.
Debian's). I don't really know if it is working fine on 2.2 or 2.3, I lost
track of this :(
O RLY?
All it does is process all child processes' messages at once instead of
only
On Thu, 08 Feb 2007, Jules Agee wrote:
All it does is process all child processes' messages at once instead of
only processing one message per master loop (to make sure master's
Heh, stock cyrus 2.1 message passing is *nothing* like what is in Debian. I
believe cyrus 2.2 is quite similar,
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
On Thu, 01 Feb 2007, Earl Shannon wrote:
Jan 31 17:24:03 uni24map master[3673]: lmtp has -2 workers?!?
Jan 31 17:24:03 uni24map master[3673]: lmtp has -1 workers?!?
Which Cyrus version, and if using a prepackaged one, exactly which
one?
Don't know if
On Wed, 07 Feb 2007, Jules Agee wrote:
Don't know if this issue has been resolved already, but I had the same
problem a few years back, and worked with Henrique to fix it. The
attached patch is what we came up with, and resolved the problem for me.
The patched master processes all messages
Hello,
We've recently started to see this show up in our imapd.log file:
Jan 31 17:24:03 uni24map master[3673]: lmtp has -2 workers?!?
Jan 31 17:24:03 uni24map master[3673]: lmtp has -1 workers?!?
Does anyone know why the master would think the lmtp count has gone
negative?
The imap server
On Thu, 01 Feb 2007, Earl Shannon wrote:
Jan 31 17:24:03 uni24map master[3673]: lmtp has -2 workers?!?
Jan 31 17:24:03 uni24map master[3673]: lmtp has -1 workers?!?
Which Cyrus version, and if using a prepackaged one, exactly which one?
--
One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them.
Hello,
Oops. That would be nice to know too wouldn't it.
Cyrus IMAP4 v2.2.12
Built from source.
Regards,
Earl Shannon
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
On Thu, 01 Feb 2007, Earl Shannon wrote:
Jan 31 17:24:03 uni24map master[3673]: lmtp has -2 workers?!?
Jan 31 17:24:03 uni24map
