Hi Andrea,
> What I found really annoying is "non-read" receipts.
Ouch, I did not know about this! I will file it away in case it ever bites me.
> > Rarely, Outlook will decide that a folder is local-only
> > [...]
> Does it at least shows the folder is local?
> Then I could train the users to
On 2020-09-05 03:11, Deborah Pickett wrote:
On 2020-09-04 18.30, Andrea Venturoli wrote:
What's the status of interoperability today?
Will OL 2013 work reliably with CyrusIMAP 3.0? 3.2?
What about newer versions of OL?
Hi Andrea,
Hello.
I can offer anecdata of interoperability between Cy
On 2020-09-04 18.30, Andrea Venturoli wrote:
What's the status of interoperability today?
Will OL 2013 work reliably with CyrusIMAP 3.0? 3.2?
What about newer versions of OL?
Hi Andrea,
I can offer anecdata of interoperability between Cyrus 3.0.x and Outlook
2016 from ten months of experienc
Hello.
A long time ago I had a customer who used OutLook with a Cyrus-IMAP
server (I think it was 2.2 at the time).
Up to OL 2010 everything was (almost) fine, but upgrading to OL 2013 was
a disaster, e.g. local-only folders, ability to move messages to folders
which didn't exist on the server
