Hi,
I have about 7,000 POP3 users and do not want newly created accounts
to be able to use the POP3 protocol, forcing them towards IMAP instead.
Is there a way to accomplish this without adding a 'deny' line for each
and every new user to user_deny.db ?
Can I build a 7,000 names li
gt; > On 24/09/15 22:57, Michael D. Sofka wrote:
> > > The plaintextloginpause affects all POP3 connections, even those that
> > > are encrypted via pop3s or STARTTLS. Not that this is necessarily a
> > > bad thing But is it expected behaviour?
> >
> &g
@Ellie - let's add this, it's plainly the right thing to do.
On Fri, Oct 16, 2015, at 02:54, Wolfgang Breyha wrote:
> On 24/09/15 22:57, Michael D. Sofka wrote:
> > The plaintextloginpause affects all POP3 connections, even those that
> > are encrypted via pop3s or STA
On 24/09/15 22:57, Michael D. Sofka wrote:
> The plaintextloginpause affects all POP3 connections, even those that
> are encrypted via pop3s or STARTTLS. Not that this is necessarily a
> bad thing But is it expected behaviour?
True for 2.4.18 and 2.5.6. Looking at the code in p
The plaintextloginpause affects all POP3 connections, even those that
are encrypted via pop3s or STARTTLS. Not that this is necessarily a
bad thing But is it expected behaviour?
Mike
--
Michael D. Sofka sof...@rpi.edu
C&MT Sr. Systems Programmer, Email, TeX, Epistemo
Hi,
from time to time I have hanging pop3 clients. I've activated telemetry
logging (thanks Bron) for that single user to see the interaction
between client and server. While downloading messages the client stops
suddenly (in middle of the body of a 6 MB big message) but the pop3
proce
=<0> top=<0> dele=<0>" on a non empty
> > mailbox. The pop3 client is connecting, but doesn't fetch and drop
> > mails. Client problem?
> >
> >
> > Oct 2 06:10:06 master cyrus/pop3[4990]: USAGE testuser-01 user:
> > 0.0
Nah, it just means it ran a UNIDO and didn't find anything to download.
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014, at 07:25 PM, Marcus Schopen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> what exactly means "counts: retr=<0> top=<0> dele=<0>" on a non empty
> mailbox. The pop3 client is connectin
Hi,
what exactly means "counts: retr=<0> top=<0> dele=<0>" on a non empty
mailbox. The pop3 client is connecting, but doesn't fetch and drop
mails. Client problem?
----
Oct 2 06:10:06 master cyrus/pop3[4990]: USAGE testuser-01 user:
0.00 sys
Good-o.
It's still a Cyrus bug, because Cyrus tries and fails to work around it.
And it's possible, in various ways (like filesystem corruption) to wind up with
a file with a long line in it - the pop3d should at least abort in that case,
not hang.
Bron.
On Sun, Jun 15, 2014, at 08:27 AM, Vin
Just to follow up on this, I realized as Joseph pointed out, the larger
problem is my MTA shouldn't be delivering RFC-breaking messages
to the Cyrus backends.
However, sendmail seems to set L=0 on the Cyrusv2 mailer, and doesn't
provide an easy way to redefine it in my macro file.
I hand-editted
On 6/14/2014 6:16 AM, Joseph Brennan wrote:
>
> Vincent Fox wrote:
>
>> I have recently noticed that certain malformed messages hang POP3 clients.
>> The pattern is that the mesages all have obscenely long last lines. I
>> can see it
>> when I set up debug
Vincent Fox wrote:
> I have recently noticed that certain malformed messages hang POP3 clients.
> The pattern is that the mesages all have obscenely long last lines. I
> can see it
> when I set up debug log dir for the account, that the download of the
> message
> proceeds fi
On Sat, Jun 14, 2014, at 04:40 PM, Vincent Fox wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have recently noticed that certain malformed messages hang POP3 clients.
> The pattern is that the mesages all have obscenely long last lines. I
> can see it
> when I set up debug log dir for the account, that t
Hi,
I have recently noticed that certain malformed messages hang POP3 clients.
The pattern is that the mesages all have obscenely long last lines. I
can see it
when I set up debug log dir for the account, that the download of the
message
proceeds fine up until 2048th character and then stops
On 01/16/12 14:43 -0300, Sergio Belkin wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I've found a lot of connections POP3 that are established since some weeks
>ago. Is there something wrong with it?
>
>I understand that is common for IMAP, but I wonder if there is something
>wrong having the same on
Hi,
I've found a lot of connections POP3 that are established since some weeks
ago. Is there something wrong with it?
I understand that is common for IMAP, but I wonder if there is something
wrong having the same on pop3.
Thanks in advance!
--
--
Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelki
gards,
Stephan
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 14:39:53 +0100
> Von: Eugen Bier
> An: info-cyrus@lists.andrew.cmu.edu
> Betreff: badlogins pop3 thunderbird 3.1.6
> hello all,
>
> we have strange behavior of our cyrus 2.3.16 on pop3 and pop3s pr
hello all,
we have strange behavior of our cyrus 2.3.16 on pop3 and pop3s protocol
with thunderbird 3.1.6. User does connect to a mailbox correctly, the
first login is successful. After 5 min, when the user reconnects to a
mailbox it comes to a 'badlogin' and then the client attempt
J. Pilfold-Bagwell wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I have a problem where I can log into cyrus using POP3 but can't with
> imap. Telnet sessions return the following:
>
> sysad...@smbserver:~$ telnet localhost 110
> Trying 127.0.0.1...
> Connected to localhost.localdomain.
>
Hi All,
I have a problem where I can log into cyrus using POP3 but can't with
imap. Telnet sessions return the following:
sysad...@smbserver:~$ telnet localhost 110
Trying 127.0.0.1...
Connected to localhost.localdomain.
Escape character is '^]'.
+OK smbserver Cyrus POP3 v2.2.1
Yeah, it's really annoying issue.
I can add to your summary that poptimeout option is not very useful because POP
daemon may stall much more than its value. It's because of blocking write()
call whose timeout depends on TCP settings of host system. For example, with my
system defaults timeout r
Jose Perez wrote:
> Some people could just say "don't use POP3 anymore, use IMAP" right?
>
YES!
> Ok, I'd say the same as a sysadmin but you know exactly that this
> isn't always possible is some organizations for others reasons not
> technical.
>
&g
Hi there:
I'm having problems with POP3 locking. I already read the forums and
info-cyrus mail archives talking about this but I didn't find a
solution yet:
- RFC states that is it necessary a minimum of 10 minutes before
detect a timeout on the client
- RFC states that only one con
On 13 Feb 2009, at 04:23, Ian Batten wrote:
> Security isn't about protocols, it's about systems, and I suspect POP3
> vs IMAP is metonymic for local vs remote mail storage.
Also keep in mind that IMAP can be used just like POP, i.e., you can
use IMAP to download & remo
in other juristictions, that's
> something that needs to be addressed when you outsource your mail (via
> contract
> with whoever you are having host your mail for you)
>
>
I worked at one organization that supported ONLY POP3.
No IMAP was offered. Each client was configur
On Fri, 13 Feb 2009, Ian Batten wrote:
> On 13 Feb 09, at 0149, Joseph Brennan wrote:
>>
>> The protocol itself is no less secure than POP.
>
> Security isn't about protocols, it's about systems, and I suspect POP3
> vs IMAP is metonymic for local vs remote mail
On Fri, 13 Feb 2009, Alain Williams wrote:
> From: Alain Williams
> To: Cyrus Mailing List
> Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 15:30:46 +
> Subject: Re: Security risk of POP3 & IMAP protocols
...
> > Yes. Anything that opens a bunch of mailboxes at the same time
> > might
--On 13 February 2009 15:30:46 + Alain Williams
wrote:
> [23~On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 03:21:06PM +, Ian Eiloart wrote:
>>
>>
>> --On 13 February 2009 14:35:43 + Alain Williams
>> wrote:
>>
>> > That got me thinking
>> > I rate limit ssh connections to try to prevent dictionary
Alain Williams wrote, at 02/13/2009 10:30 AM:
> [23~On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 03:21:06PM +, Ian Eiloart wrote:
>>
>> --On 13 February 2009 14:35:43 + Alain Williams
>> wrote:
>>
>>> That got me thinking
>>> I rate limit ssh connections to try to prevent dictionary attacks (3
>>> attemp
[23~On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 03:21:06PM +, Ian Eiloart wrote:
>
>
> --On 13 February 2009 14:35:43 + Alain Williams
> wrote:
>
> >That got me thinking
> >I rate limit ssh connections to try to prevent dictionary attacks (3
> >attempts/3 minutes/IP address). If I were to do the same
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 5:49 PM, Jason Voorhees wrote:
> Hi people:
>
> A friend of mine is asking me about security risks of using IMAP &
> POP3 protocols. Why? Because a sales person told my friend that IMAP
> protocol is less secure than POP3 protocol. This assumption is not
--On 13 February 2009 14:35:43 + Alain Williams
wrote:
> That got me thinking
> I rate limit ssh connections to try to prevent dictionary attacks (3
> attempts/3 minutes/IP address). If I were to do the same with IMAP would
> that cause problems with some clients, ie are there some cl
Alain Williams wrote:
> That got me thinking
> I rate limit ssh connections to try to prevent dictionary attacks (3
> attempts/3 minutes/IP address).
> If I were to do the same with IMAP would that cause problems with some
> clients,
> ie are there some clients that to many connect/disconne
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 09:13:40AM -0500, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-02-13 at 13:17 +, Duncan Gibb wrote:
> > Jason Voorhees wrote:
> > JV> a sales person told my friend that IMAP protocol is
> > JV> less secure than POP3 protocol.
> > Other peo
Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
JV> a sales person told my friend that IMAP protocol is
JV> less secure than POP3 protocol.
ATW> It is really far and away more about end-to-end security
ATW> practices than it is the OSI layer 7 protocol(s) involved.
Indeed.
ATW> I stand by my ass
On Fri, 2009-02-13 at 13:17 +, Duncan Gibb wrote:
> Jason Voorhees wrote:
> JV> a sales person told my friend that IMAP protocol is
> JV> less secure than POP3 protocol.
> Other people have covered the IMAP vs POP3 issues - Ian Batten most
> comprehensively - but one c
Jason Voorhees wrote:
JV> a sales person told my friend that IMAP protocol is
JV> less secure than POP3 protocol.
Other people have covered the IMAP vs POP3 issues - Ian Batten most
comprehensively - but one comment I would add is that if you make either
service available to the open in
On 13 Feb 09, at 0149, Joseph Brennan wrote:
>
> The protocol itself is no less secure than POP.
Security isn't about protocols, it's about systems, and I suspect POP3
vs IMAP is metonymic for local vs remote mail storage.
I can see an argument that says that one problem w
Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
>> A friend of mine is asking me about security risks of using IMAP &
>> POP3 protocols. Why? Because a sales person told my friend that IMAP
>> protocol is less secure than POP3 protocol.
This reminds me of a concern that was raised about U Wa
> A friend of mine is asking me about security risks of using IMAP &
> POP3 protocols. Why? Because a sales person told my friend that IMAP
> protocol is less secure than POP3 protocol. This assumption is not
> related to Cyrus IMAP, instead is related only to the protocols.
&g
On Feb 12, 2009, at 2:49 PM, Jason Voorhees wrote:
Hi people:
A friend of mine is asking me about security risks of using IMAP &
POP3 protocols. Why? Because a sales person told my friend that IMAP
protocol is less secure than POP3 protocol. This assumption is not
related to Cyrus
Hi people:
A friend of mine is asking me about security risks of using IMAP &
POP3 protocols. Why? Because a sales person told my friend that IMAP
protocol is less secure than POP3 protocol. This assumption is not
related to Cyrus IMAP, instead is related only to the protocols.
I'm sea
Mike Eggleston schrieb:
> On Mon, 05 Jan 2009, Tomasz Chmielewski might have said:
>> Stracing it leads me to an empty /dev/random.
>>
>> After looking at man pages, I see there is no option to specify an
>> alternative random file location (i.e., /dev/urandom).
>>
>> Is recompilation the only wa
Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
> Tomasz Chmielewski schrieb:
>> My Cyrus is hanging when I try to connect to the POP3 or POP3S port
>> several times, i.e. when connecting like this three-four-five times in a
>> row:
>
>> $ telnet 127.0.0.1 110
>> Trying 12
Tomasz Chmielewski schrieb:
> My Cyrus is hanging when I try to connect to the POP3 or POP3S port
> several times, i.e. when connecting like this three-four-five times in a
> row:
> $ telnet 127.0.0.1 110
> Trying 127.0.0.1...
> Connected to localhost (127.0.0.1).
>
My Cyrus is hanging when I try to connect to the POP3 or POP3S port
several times, i.e. when connecting like this three-four-five times in a
row:
$ telnet 127.0.0.1 110
Trying 127.0.0.1...
Connected to localhost (127.0.0.1).
Escape character is '^]'.
+OK <2041089544.1231155...@imap
On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 10:42:09PM +1100, Bron Gondwana wrote:
> Counting messages would be a separate patch to just pop3.
Something like this...
Bron ( it counts retr, top and dele commands only, I figured I couldn't
be arsed counting list and uidl )
Index: cyrus-imapd-2.3
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 02:27:07PM -0500, Anthony Tibbs wrote:
> Hi Eddy,
>
> I had worked on this briefly and, given a day or so, I could probably come
> up with a working solution at least for byte/traffic accounting. Logging
> 'messages retrieved' for POP3 could mak
Hi Eddy,
I had worked on this briefly and, given a day or so, I could probably come
up with a working solution at least for byte/traffic accounting. Logging
'messages retrieved' for POP3 could make some sense, but it gets complicated
with clients using "TOP" to partially r
Hi! Netfriends,
I sent this email last week but didn't received any replies.
So, I would like to spin it again... Maybe my title was obscure. ;-)
I would like to log some statistics when any user retrieves their pop3's
emails.
Currently:
... pop3[32760]: login: address [ip] user
Paul van der Vlis schrieb:
> Is it possible to log the IP-numbers from people who access a server
> using POP3 or IMAP?
Isn't that what IMAPd does anyway?
Sep 26 10:08:26 local6:notice imap[2551820]: login: hostname.domain
[inter.net.add.ress] username plain+TLS User logged
Hello,
Is it possible to log the IP-numbers from people who access a server
using POP3 or IMAP?
Or is there maybe a way to block people who do a trying too many passwords?
With regards,
Paul van der Vlis.
--
http://www.vandervlis.nl/
Cyrus Home Page: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu
Original Message
Subject: Re: cyrus pop3 question
From: Jorey Bump <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Corey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wednesday, April 16, 2008 4:18:58 PM
Corey wrote, at 04/16/2008 04:29 PM:
I just had an experience where my server was getting slammed wi
Corey wrote, at 04/16/2008 04:29 PM:
> I just had an experience where my server was getting slammed with thousands
> of concurrent pop3 requests. This went on for over an hour before it finally
> ceased, at which point I was able to start cyrus again.
>
> Anyhow, what are som
On Wednesday 16 April 2008 01:44:50 pm Andrew Morgan wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Apr 2008, Corey wrote:
> > I just had an experience where my server was getting slammed with
> > thousands of concurrent pop3 requests. This went on for over an hour
> > before it finally ceased, at whic
On Wed, 16 Apr 2008, Corey wrote:
> I just had an experience where my server was getting slammed with thousands
> of concurrent pop3 requests. This went on for over an hour before it finally
> ceased, at which point I was able to start cyrus again.
>
> Anyhow, what are some mechan
I just had an experience where my server was getting slammed with thousands
of concurrent pop3 requests. This went on for over an hour before it finally
ceased, at which point I was able to start cyrus again.
Anyhow, what are some mechanisms to prevent this in the future?
In the mean time, I&#
ist
> of advertised mechanisms by using the 'sasl_mech_list' option in
> imapd.conf
>
>
> Joshua Tew wrote:
>> I have not been able to authenticate POP3 over SSL from thunderbird
>> 2.0.0.12 to Cyrus POm.3.8 on a OS X Server 10.5.
>> I have narrowed
d.conf
>
>
> Joshua Tew wrote:
>> I have not been able to authenticate POP3 over SSL from thunderbird
>> 2.0.0.12 to Cyrus POm.3.8 on a OS X Server 10.5.
>> I have narrowed down the cause to be a wrong set of supported
>> authentication mechanism being advertised w
You can either remove the CRAM-MD5 SASL plugin, or restrict the list of
advertised mechanisms by using the 'sasl_mech_list' option in imapd.conf
Joshua Tew wrote:
> I have not been able to authenticate POP3 over SSL from thunderbird
> 2.0.0.12 to Cyrus POm.3.8 on a OS X Server
I have not been able to authenticate POP3 over SSL from thunderbird
2.0.0.12 to Cyrus POP3 v2.3.8 on a OS X Server 10.5.
I have narrowed down the cause to be a wrong set of supported
authentication mechanism being advertised when thunderbird queried the
POP3 server in AUTH.
For example
yesterday I was using squirrelmail to try send a message via my
cyrus... i got an "imap server refused connection" "server
busy; try again later" "unable to open imap thread"
message; i tried pop3 with my outlook and it worked; i was able to send
the message (esmtp
Hello -
I realize that this question is based on OS X Server and not a true
Cyrus installation, but I thought I would ask anyway.
I'm having a problem where I would like people to authenticate by
their full email address (such as [EMAIL PROTECTED]). In the OSX
Directory Service, I have given each
Yann Rouillard wrote:
> Le dimanche 30 septembre 2007 à 11:39 +0300, Georgy Goshin a écrit :
>> Hello,
>>
>> Thanks for the answer but the answer was not do I need this or not, I've
>> asked how to do it. I'll try to explain why I need this and I beleive that
>> not only I am.
>
> You're not, I
er a patch or find someone to do
> it.
>
> Yann
>
But as Jorey Bumb said, wouldn't it be easier to just switch to IMAP and
offer your customers a better protocol than POP3? I don't see why you
are still offering POP when IMAP provides what you want in the first
place. Plus
Le dimanche 30 septembre 2007 à 11:39 +0300, Georgy Goshin a écrit :
> Hello,
>
> Thanks for the answer but the answer was not do I need this or not, I've
> asked how to do it. I'll try to explain why I need this and I beleive that
> not only I am.
You're not, I opened a bug about this sometim
g) clients uses POP3 to get their mails form
the server, almost all of them leaves the messages on the server for a 5-20
days, about a half of them uses webamil access to read their mail from home,
from places other than office and this is a place where we need all read
mails marked as
Georgy Goshin wrote, at 09/29/2007 06:12 AM:
> I need the Cyrus POP3 server marks all messages read by client but left on
> server as read. How to do this?
POP3 does not mark messages as read. The client downloads the messages,
then *it* tracks which messages are read. For obvious reason
Hi,
I need the Cyrus POP3 server marks all messages read by client but left on
server as read. How to do this?
Thanks,
G.
Cyrus Home Page: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/
Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/twiki
List Archives/Info: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus/mailing-list.html
Hello!
I've been looking through the docs and searched with Google, but I have
only seen the mentioning that it is possible to configure cyrus that
emails are left on the server, even when they have been downloaded via
POP3. Can someone help me please?
Thanks in advance,
Johannes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> I'm trying to find an option regarding the POP3 time limit. The default
>> is that one can't request again to look for new emails within 60 seconds
>> counting from the last request. I need to disable this or to reduce it
&g
Hi,
> I'm trying to find an option regarding the POP3 time limit. The default
> is that one can't request again to look for new emails within 60 seconds
> counting from the last request. I need to disable this or to reduce it
> to a few seconds at best. Who can help m
Johannes Luber wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I'm trying to find an option regarding the POP3 time limit. The default
> is that one can't request again to look for new emails within 60 seconds
> counting from the last request. I need to disable this or to reduce it
> to a few s
Hello!
I'm trying to find an option regarding the POP3 time limit. The default
is that one can't request again to look for new emails within 60 seconds
counting from the last request. I need to disable this or to reduce it
to a few seconds at best. Who can help me?
Thanks in advance
David S. Madole wrote:
>
> If you are talking about the suggestion I made, which looked like this:
>
> iptables -A INPUT -p tcp --dport 22 \
> -m state --state NEW \
> -m recent --update --seconds 60 -j DROP
>
> iptables -A INPUT -p tcp --dport 22 \
> -m state --state
On Tue, May 22, 2007 at 11:14:49AM -0400, Robert Banz wrote:
> *security people seem to obsess on "perfect" solutions. It bothers me.
No, _real_ security people know that there is NO perfect solution. You
always have to balance the cost of the defenses with the cost of the
thing you want to prot
David S. Madole wrote:
>> From Matthew Schumacher on Monday, May 21, 2007 6:35 PM
>>
>> I agree with Blake, while I can do it with IPtables it's not
>> a good solution.
>>
>> The first iptables suggestion blocked the offending IP, which
>> is fine, but also requires me to babysit the server. The
Matthew Schumacher wrote:
May 21 11:02:01 larry pop3[5945]: badlogin: [83.209.35.32] plaintext
cristopher SASL(-13): authentication failure: checkpass failed
May 21 11:02:02 larry pop3[5965]: badlogin: [83.209.35.32] plaintext
easter SASL(-13): authentication failure: checkpass failed
May 21 11
On May 22, 2007, at 10:34, Philip H. O'Neill wrote:
We do the same but there is an issues.
One File::Tail delays polling the log for up to 30 seconds unless you
tell it otherwise. So it will allow a number of attempts before
reading
the log. If you increase the polling you add load to the s
We do the same but there is an issues.
One File::Tail delays polling the log for up to 30 seconds unless you
tell it otherwise. So it will allow a number of attempts before reading
the log. If you increase the polling you add load to the system. Not
much but some.
We like the idea of adding the t
m
> To: info-cyrus@lists.andrew.cmu.edu
> Subject: Connection throttling POP3.
>
> List,
>
> I'm getting some spammer trying to guess usernames and passwords:
>
> May 21 11:01:55 larry pop3[5845]: badlogin: [83.209.35.32] plaintext bob
> SASL(-13): authentication failure: checkp
On May 21, 2007, at 21:50, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
On Tuesday 22 May 2007 05:10, Matthew Schumacher wrote:
I'm getting some spammer trying to guess usernames and passwords:
I use the following to protect my SSH server (well not the SSH server
per se, just me reading logfiles the next day)
ht
On Tuesday 22 May 2007 05:10, Matthew Schumacher wrote:
> I'm getting some spammer trying to guess usernames and passwords:
I use the following to protect my SSH server (well not the SSH server
per se, just me reading logfiles the next day)
http://www.gsoft.com.au/~doconnor/brute-force-mitigatio
applied to POP3. Your logs
indicate that a much lower time limit would suffice (not sure why your
second line is -1 seconds after the first, though). Even if the protocol
allows it, I'm willing to bet you'll find some brain-dead mail client
that has problems, though.
C
> From Matthew Schumacher on Monday, May 21, 2007 6:35 PM
>
> I agree with Blake, while I can do it with IPtables it's not
> a good solution.
>
> The first iptables suggestion blocked the offending IP, which
> is fine, but also requires me to babysit the server. The
> second suggestion would c
Blake Hudson wrote:
>
> These types of threats are becoming more and more common and in reaction
> awareness is increasing and more software seems to be implementing
> mechanisms to cope. I would personally love to see Cyrus implement some
> sort of connection limit or throttling per IP/network/us
> On Mon, 21 May 2007, Matthew Schumacher wrote:
>
>> List,
>>
>> And this spammer is racking up a zillion processes which
is killing
>> my machine. I need a way to throttle this somehow where
he is only
>> allowed one connection per IP at a time, or perhaps a way
to ignore
>> them after so
On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 03:36:34PM -0500, Blake Hudson wrote:
> Andrew Morgan wrote:
> > On Mon, 21 May 2007, Matthew Schumacher wrote:
> >
> >> And this spammer is racking up a zillion processes which is killing my
> >> machine. I need a way to throttle this somehow where he is only allowed
> >>
Andrew Morgan wrote:
> I believe there are also some solutions to monitor
> connections and automatically add IP addresses to the /etc/hosts.deny
> file, but I've never used them myself.
Fail2ban will do this (and more) see http://fail2ban.sourceforge.net/
If your system uses PAM, it's also worth
Andrew Morgan wrote:
> On Mon, 21 May 2007, Matthew Schumacher wrote:
>
>> List,
>>
>> And this spammer is racking up a zillion processes which is killing my
>> machine. I need a way to throttle this somehow where he is only allowed
>> one connection per IP at a time, or perhaps a way to ignore th
On Mon, 21 May 2007, Matthew Schumacher wrote:
List,
I'm getting some spammer trying to guess usernames and passwords:
May 21 11:01:55 larry pop3[5845]: badlogin: [83.209.35.32] plaintext bob
SASL(-13): authentication failure: checkpass failed
May 21 11:01:54 larry pop3[5860]: bad
mu.edu
Subject: Connection throttling POP3.
List,
I'm getting some spammer trying to guess usernames and passwords:
May 21 11:01:55 larry pop3[5845]: badlogin: [83.209.35.32] plaintext bob
SASL(-13): authentication failure: checkpass failed
May 21 11:01:54 larry pop3[5860]: badlogin: [83.209.35.32
List,
I'm getting some spammer trying to guess usernames and passwords:
May 21 11:01:55 larry pop3[5845]: badlogin: [83.209.35.32] plaintext bob
SASL(-13): authentication failure: checkpass failed
May 21 11:01:54 larry pop3[5860]: badlogin: [83.209.35.32] plaintext
complaints SAS
On Tue, 3 Apr 2007, tloudev wrote:
hi,
I have serious problem with my cyrus21 (debian sarge 2.1.18-1) - I have
hundreds of connectin in CLOSE_WAIT state.
I can telnet to port 110 , but sometimes I can't even get the banner of the
service.
I tried to increase maxchild (now -1 - unlimited), I tr
hi,
I have serious problem with my cyrus21 (debian sarge 2.1.18-1) - I have
hundreds of connectin in CLOSE_WAIT state.
I can telnet to port 110 , but sometimes I can't even get the banner of
the service.
I tried to increase maxchild (now -1 - unlimited), I tried babysit,
increasing maxfds up to
Hi, you could use fetchmail to do it, just need to reset all the password
from the "Old" server, and configure the file /etc/fetchmailrc
works good!
Regards,
On 3/27/07, BipinDas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi All,
I would like to migrate my existing POP3 inboxs to newly cr
On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 12:10:39PM +0530, BipinDas wrote:
> >>I would like to migrate my existing POP3 inboxs to newly created Cyrus
> >>IMAP mailbox. Is anybody gone across this requirement.
> >>Please give me a right solution.
> >>Thanks in advance.
>
--On Wednesday, March 28, 2007 12:10 +0530 BipinDas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Hi All,
I would like to migrate my existing POP3 inboxs to newly created Cyrus
IMAP mailbox. Is anybody gone across this requirement.
Please give me a right solution.
POP3 inboxes are stored locally o
Michael Menge wrote:
Hi,
i know too different konzepts of migrating mailservers. They both have
pros and cons.
1. split mbox, copy, reconstruct
depending on how your POP-server stores the mails, you have to split
each mailbox into single files for every e-mail. Then you copy the files
1 - 100 of 326 matches
Mail list logo
