Question about 'flagged' attribute

2009-11-23 Thread Julien Vehent
Hello Cyrus guys, I was wondering if there were any undergoing work to extend the flagged attribute of IMAP into something more configurable ? I am thinking of some sort of labelling similar to what is implemented on gmail, for example, but also with the wirtual folders in Outlook and extended

Re: Question about 'flagged' attribute

2009-11-23 Thread Dan White
On 23/11/09 10:17 +0100, Julien Vehent wrote: I was wondering if there were any undergoing work to extend the flagged attribute of IMAP into something more configurable ? I am thinking of some sort of labelling similar to what is implemented on gmail, for example, but also with the wirtual

Re: Question about 'flagged' attribute

2009-11-23 Thread Brian Awood
This was just discussed on the list, check the thread ANNOTATEMORE = METADATA and rfc 5464 in the archive. -Brian On Monday 23 November 2009 @ 04:17, Julien Vehent wrote: Hello Cyrus guys, I was wondering if there were any undergoing work to extend the flagged attribute of IMAP into

Re: Question about 'flagged' attribute

2009-11-23 Thread Julien Vehent
On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 08:48:30 -0600, Dan White dwh...@olp.net wrote: On 23/11/09 10:17 +0100, Julien Vehent wrote: I was wondering if there were any undergoing work to extend the flagged attribute of IMAP into something more configurable ? I am thinking of some sort of labelling similar to what

Re: Question about 'flagged' attribute

2009-11-23 Thread Julien Vehent
Humm I'm not sure of this but aren't annotations associated to mailboxes and not emails? On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 10:01:36 -0500, Brian Awood baw...@umich.edu wrote: This was just discussed on the list, check the thread ANNOTATEMORE = METADATA and rfc 5464 in the archive. -Brian On