Re: Several issues with 2.1.13

2003-06-09 Thread John Alton Tamplin
Wil Cooley wrote: The upgrade wasn't entirely smooth; I wrote up some notes about what I did: http://nakedape.cc/wiki/index.cgi/CyrusImapNotes in case someone else wanders along this path... The biggest issue was that ctl_cyrusdb wasn't able to read my old mailboxes.db file; I reverted to my old

Re: Several issues with 2.1.13

2003-06-09 Thread Rob Siemborski
On Mon, 9 Jun 2003, Wil Cooley wrote: 'rehash full' did very strange things; it only created directories of A-Z, none of a-z and my own mailbox information was under 'I/' in both the mailbox spool and the '/var/lib/imap/user' directory. As a result, I had to disable 'hashimapspool', which

Re: Several issues with 2.1.13

2003-06-09 Thread Wil Cooley
On Mon, 2003-06-09 at 12:53, John Alton Tamplin wrote: If the version of db is different, you can't just expect to use the binary database files and logs. Dumping the contents to a text file, wiping the transaction logs, and then reloading them is the safest way. That was sort of what I

Re: Several issues with 2.1.13

2003-06-09 Thread Wil Cooley
On Mon, 2003-06-09 at 13:01, Rob Siemborski wrote: On Mon, 9 Jun 2003, Wil Cooley wrote: 'rehash full' did very strange things; it only created directories of A-Z, none of a-z and my own mailbox information was under 'I/' in both the mailbox spool and the '/var/lib/imap/user' directory.

Re: Several issues with 2.1.13

2003-06-09 Thread Rob Siemborski
On Mon, 9 Jun 2003, Wil Cooley wrote: On Mon, 2003-06-09 at 13:01, Rob Siemborski wrote: On Mon, 9 Jun 2003, Wil Cooley wrote: 'rehash full' did very strange things; it only created directories of A-Z, none of a-z and my own mailbox information was under 'I/' in both the mailbox

Re: Several issues with 2.1.13

2003-06-09 Thread John Alton Tamplin
Wil Cooley wrote: Yeah, you're probably right; I just saw a directory full of capital letters and assumed it was all of them. I do recall prime-based hash functions being better. However, after I did the hash, imapd seemed to still be using the traditional first-letter-hash. I had this in my

Re: Several issues with 2.1.13

2003-06-09 Thread Wil Cooley
On Mon, 2003-06-09 at 13:52, Rob Siemborski wrote: Right, apparently your binaries weren't built to deal with a fulldirhash system, but you ran the rehash command to use a fulldirhash system. Yeah, duh. Re-RTFMing, I see Simon has in README.RPM: 4) Please note that this RPM uses 'basic'

Re: Several issues with 2.1.13

2003-06-09 Thread John Alton Tamplin
Wil Cooley wrote: Got it. But John's probably right about the kernel keeping the sockets open. But we never had this problem with cucipop (that's what I always have to listen to: We didn't have this problem before blah blah blah). Somehow, even though cucipop locked the mailboxes, it was able

RE: Several issues with 2.1.13

2003-06-09 Thread Bojan Zdrnja
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wil Cooley Sent: Tuesday, 10 June 2003 9:23 a.m. To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Several issues with 2.1.13 Got it. But John's probably right about the kernel keeping the sockets open

Re: Several issues with 2.1.13

2003-06-09 Thread Rob Siemborski
On Mon, 9 Jun 2003, Wil Cooley wrote: Research Systems Programmer * /usr/contributed Gatekeeper You might want to look at the couple scripts I wrote to replace the TCL-based ones in Managing IMAP: http://nakedape.cc/wiki/index.cgi/CyrusImapNotes I don't believe anything in Managing IMAP,

Re: Several issues with 2.1.13

2003-06-09 Thread Wil Cooley
On Mon, 2003-06-09 at 16:15, Rob Siemborski wrote: On Mon, 9 Jun 2003, Wil Cooley wrote: Research Systems Programmer * /usr/contributed Gatekeeper You might want to look at the couple scripts I wrote to replace the TCL-based ones in Managing IMAP: