On 10 May 2007, at 06:45, Nik Conwell wrote:
Thanks for the info & patch. I applied it to the 2.3.7 test system
but no appreciable speed increase.
Did it help you with both large replications (I'm doing a single
1.1G user to test) and the rolling replication?
ttcp shows the nets can do about
On May 9, 2007, at 2:01 PM, Wesley Craig wrote:
Obviously looking at more iostat information would give a better
idea, but I'd estimate that you are NOT I/O bound. Sorry I can't
give you absolute numbers from UM, but I can share a patch that we
wrote that we believe has increase sync thro
Obviously looking at more iostat information would give a better
idea, but I'd estimate that you are NOT I/O bound. Sorry I can't
give you absolute numbers from UM, but I can share a patch that we
wrote that we believe has increase sync throughput substantially, as
evidenced by the lack of
What sort of rates are you all getting for replication?
At 2.3.7 for a manual sync_client for a user, I'm seeing ~35MB/minute
across a 100M net to a linux SW RAID 1 pair of U320 disks.
Is this speed typical or abysmal?
Disks appear to be holding me back:
Device:rrqm/s wrqm/s r/s w/s
