At Wed, 28 Oct 2009 08:51:45 +0800, Zhang Weiwu wrote:
Subject: Re: sieve question: archive script
>
> Bron Gondwana wrote:
> > Sieve only runs during the LMTP phase. It doesn't move messages.
> >
> > I'd say go Perl + IMAP. It's pretty easy.
> >
Though it's usually:
fileinto "user.fred.Spam"
Zitat von Scott Likens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Assuming that user has the 'p' right to user.fred.INBOX.Spam then yes.
> If they don't have the 'p' right, the mail will just be sent in limbo.
> On Jul 4, 2008, at 9:30 AM, Bob Bob wrote:
> Hi
another ...
Begin forwarded message:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: July 5, 2008 3:32:02 AM PDT
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Fwd: NDN: Re: Simple Sieve question
Dear Business Partner,
for months the mails of our user have been sent to you from our new
Domain.
This Domain has now been
If someone can please remove this user from the mailing lists?
Thanks :)
Begin forwarded message:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: July 4, 2008 3:54:47 PM PDT
To: "Scott Likens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: NDN: Re: Simple Sieve question
Sorry. Your message could not
Assuming that user has the 'p' right to user.fred.INBOX.Spam then yes.
If they don't have the 'p' right, the mail will just be sent in limbo.
On Jul 4, 2008, at 9:30 AM, Bob Bob wrote:
Hi all
Cant seem to find an answer on this one.. I should experiment but
would like some advance info.
C
Hi all
Cant seem to find an answer on this one.. I should experiment but would
like some advance info.
Can sieve "fileinto" into a mailbox folder that is not at or below the
Inbox?. If so what would the syntax look like;
ie
fileinto "/user.fred.INBOX.Spam" instead of just "INBOX.Spam" as us
On Tue, 25 May 2004, Frederik Vervaet wrote:
Is there any chance these extensions will be added in the next (few)
release(s) ?
Its not tremendously likely, no. Adding sieve extensions makes the code
worse and worse the more we add. Given the propensity of sieve extensions
to never get "locked"
Frederik Vervaet wrote:
On Tue, 25 May 2004, Ken Murchison wrote:
Frederik Vervaet wrote:
Any pointers ?
There are some drafts of Sieve extensions for tweaking headers, but
Cyrus doesn't support any of them yet.
Is there any chance these extensions will be added in the next (few)
release(s) ?
I
On Tue, 25 May 2004, Ken Murchison wrote:
Frederik Vervaet wrote:
Any pointers ?
There are some drafts of Sieve extensions for tweaking headers, but Cyrus
doesn't support any of them yet.
Is there any chance these extensions will be added in the next (few)
release(s) ?
--
Frederik Vervaet
---
C
Frederik Vervaet wrote:
I'm looking into adding some filtering to my postfix/cyrus server. I
allready got sieve working nicely but i was wondering if sieve supports
some actions i'm used to having on a server with procmail. For example :
editing mails, adding headers , removing text/headers etc
I'm looking into adding some filtering to my postfix/cyrus server. I
allready got sieve working nicely but i was wondering if sieve supports
some actions i'm used to having on a server with procmail. For example :
editing mails, adding headers , removing text/headers etc ?
Any pointers ?
--
Fre
On Thu, 9 Oct 2003, Etienne Goyer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It is my understanding that message replied to by the vacation extension
> will still be delivered in the mailbox. Is it possible not to deliver
> when vacation match ?
>
> Thanks !
You could add an explicit "discard;" after the vacation to do
On Thu, 9 Oct 2003, Etienne Goyer wrote:
> It is my understanding that message replied to by the vacation extension
> will still be delivered in the mailbox. Is it possible not to deliver
> when vacation match ?
is:
if test {
vacation ...;
discard;
}
what you mean?
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Hi,
It is my understanding that message replied to by the vacation extension
will still be delivered in the mailbox. Is it possible not to deliver
when vacation match ?
Thanks !
--
Etienne GoyerLinux Québec Technologies Inc.
http://www.LinuxQuebec.com [EMAIL PROTECTED
I'm still relatively new to Sieve (we've been using Exim filter files up
to now), so I suspect I'm missing something obvious here.
What is the recommended way to filter mail delivery reports? I'm the
postmaster for a 25k user mail system, and really don't want all of the
bounces in my primary INBO
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Does sieve support filing incoming mail into two mailboxes? I have a user
who want to file much of his mail into one backup folder and then process it
with other filters later. However, I'm finding that l
eve
implementations which have a body test, and they are non-standard.
> -Original Message-
> From: Ken Murchison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: November 26, 2002 2:51 PM
> To: Su Li
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Sieve question -- BODY contains
>
> Su L
Thanks a lot Ken,
So there is not way I can filter according to the content of the BODY. How about
"exits"?
Su
-Original Message-
From: Ken Murchison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: November 26, 2002 2:51 PM
To: Su Li
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Sieve questi
Su Li wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> In Sieve I saw a lot of "header :contains ...". I wonder, if a user needs to do some
>filtering when 'body contains "test filter"', is there some thing like "body" to
>replace "header"?
No. There is an I-D for a body extension, but its not implemented in
cmu-sieve.
Hi,
In Sieve I saw a lot of "header :contains ...". I wonder, if a user needs to do some
filtering when 'body contains "test filter"', is there some thing like "body" to
replace "header"?
So I can do:
if body :contains "From"
{
discard;
}
Thanks,
Su
"John C. Amodeo" wrote:
>
> Greetings,
>
> This may be a stupid question, but I have seen enough mail about Sieve
> Vacation in the past few days, I had a thought...
>
> Can you specify wildcards for the vacation addresses? Over here, we
> have something like 6 different e-mail aliases that
Greetings,
This may be a stupid question, but I have seen enough mail about Sieve
Vacation in the past few days, I had a thought...
Can you specify wildcards for the vacation addresses? Over here, we
have something like 6 different e-mail aliases that all point to the
same account, and what I a
Ralf Haferkamp wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Is it possible to write a SIEVE filterrule that checks all mail headers for
> a specific string? Something like:
>
> if header :contains [*] "blahblah"{
> discard; ^
> }|
> |
>
Hi,
Is it possible to write a SIEVE filterrule that checks all mail headers for
a specific string? Something like:
if header :contains [*] "blahblah"{
discard; ^
}|
|
|___
24 matches
Mail list logo
