Re: SSL wrapped sieve support (ala "imaps") for timsieved [LONG]

2003-06-17 Thread Rob Siemborski
On Tue, 17 Jun 2003, Ben Poliakoff wrote: > When it comes to sieve, I'd really like to be able to do the same sort > of thing. Right now to support a cgi/web based sieve client (like > websieve, easysieve, squirrelmail's sieve plugin, or Horde's Ingo - > none of which support STARTTLS) I need to

Re: SSL wrapped sieve support (ala "imaps") for timsieved [LONG]

2003-06-17 Thread Ben Poliakoff
* Rob Siemborski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030617 10:49]: > On Tue, 17 Jun 2003, Ben Poliakoff wrote: > > > Given that in many environments end user interactions with sieve scripts > > are mediated by web based interfaces (that don't easily lend themselves > > to authentication methods like SASL/GSSAPI

Re: SSL wrapped sieve support (ala "imaps") for timsieved [LONG]

2003-06-17 Thread Ben Poliakoff
Looks like I forgot to reply to the list on that last message Thanks for the reminder about the -C flag for timsieved. Using that I can at least limit the "allowplaintext: yes" to timsieved. So we can stumble along with this solution (and the stunnels) until we are able to come up with a STA

Re: SSL wrapped sieve support (ala "imaps") for timsieved [LONG]

2003-06-17 Thread Scott Russell
On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 12:24:49PM -0700, Ben Poliakoff wrote: > Thanks for the reminder about the -C flag for timsieved. Using that I > can at least limit the "allowplaintext: yes" to timsieved. > > So we can stumble along with this solution (and the stunnels) until we > are able to come up with

Re: SSL wrapped sieve support (ala "imaps") for timsieved [LONG]

2003-06-18 Thread Edward Rudd
the PHP Pear Net_Sieve does not support CRAM-MD5/DIGEST-MD5 currently.. only plain and login.. I'm working on a patch to get it to support them by using the Auth_SASL PEAR class. I should have it done late wednesday and posting it to the author of the pear class. On Tue, 2003-06-17 at 20:52, Scot

Re: SSL wrapped sieve support (ala "imaps") for timsieved [LONG]

2003-06-18 Thread Sebastian Hagedorn
--On Dienstag, 17. Juni 2003 21:52 Uhr -0400 Scott Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 12:24:49PM -0700, Ben Poliakoff wrote: Thanks for the reminder about the -C flag for timsieved. Using that I can at least limit the "allowplaintext: yes" to timsieved. So we can stumble

Re: SSL wrapped sieve support (ala "imaps") for timsieved [LONG]

2003-06-18 Thread Scott Russell
On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 09:11:25AM +0200, Sebastian Hagedorn wrote: > Hmm, are those patches freely available? Smartsieve is also PHP-based and > only offers PLAIN, so I'd be interested if your patches would work there as > well. Yes, they are. I posted it to the info-cyrus list way back when b

Re: SSL wrapped sieve support (ala "imaps") for timsieved [LONG]

2003-06-18 Thread Sebastian Hagedorn
--On Mittwoch, 18. Juni 2003 7:57 Uhr -0400 Scott Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 09:11:25AM +0200, Sebastian Hagedorn wrote: Hmm, are those patches freely available? Smartsieve is also PHP-based and only offers PLAIN, so I'd be interested if your patches would work t

Re: SSL wrapped sieve support (ala "imaps") for timsieved [LONG]

2003-06-18 Thread Scott Russell
On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 02:08:09PM +0200, Sebastian Hagedorn wrote: > Thanks a lot! I forwarded them to the maintainer of Smartsieve. He thinks > that they should work with Smartsieve as well ... Cool. It would be better if someone would handle rewriting the mhash functions needed in pure PHP to

Re: SSL wrapped sieve support (ala "imaps") for timsieved [LONG]

2003-06-18 Thread Ben Poliakoff
* Scott Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030617 18:52]: > > So we can stumble along with this solution (and the stunnels) until we > > are able to come up with a STARTTLS patch for the PHP/Pear Net_Sieve > > class. > > Ohh, didn't know this existed. I'm still using sieve-php.lib from Dan > Ellis with

Re: SSL wrapped sieve support (ala "imaps") for timsieved [LONG]

2003-06-18 Thread Marc Groot Koerkamp
Scott Russell zei: > On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 02:08:09PM +0200, Sebastian Hagedorn wrote: >> Thanks a lot! I forwarded them to the maintainer of Smartsieve. He thinks >> that they should work with Smartsieve as well ... > > Cool. It would be better if someone would handle rewriting the mhash functio