On Wed, 2003-01-29 at 19:25, Cyrus Daboo wrote:
> With this setup isn't it possible for a virus to end up in the spam folder
> if it gets classified as spam as well as a virus, given the order of the
> actions in the SIEVE script? I would have thought it better to put all
> virii into the virus
Hi Mike,
--On Wednesday, January 29, 2003 06:22:25 PM -0500 Mike Cathey
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| SNIP
| require
| ["fileinto","reject","vacation","imapflags","relational","comparator-i;as
| cii-numeric","regex"]; if
| header :contains "X-Spam-Flag" "YES"
| {
| fileinto "Spam";
| stop
Tarjei,
On Wed, 2003-01-29 at 15:16, Tarjei Huse wrote:
> Now, I'm wondering what is the current "best practices" when it comes to
> spamfighting w/many users. Sure, I could make a solution for my own part, but
> I want something that works for everyone on my server.
>
> So, is there a neat w
this is what I'm using for my setup.
cyrus IMAPD
spamassassin 2.43
postfix MTA w/ sasl auth enabled..
and spampd...http://www.wolddesign.com/index.cfm/rd/mta/spampd.htm
using the advanced content filter in postfix, I have postfix forward
mail to spampd which then checks and tags all mail and then
Hi, I've kindof followed the discussions regarding spam on this list.
Now, I'm wondering what is the current "best practices" when it comes to
spamfighting w/many users. Sure, I could make a solution for my own part, but
I want something that works for everyone on my server.
So, is there a ne
