On 30 Nov 07, at 0234, Vincent Fox wrote:
> We had sym-linked imap/proc directory to a size-limited
> TMPFS a while back.
>
> Now I'm thinking to do the same for imap/socket and imap/log
>
> Any reasons against? Other candidates?
What's the point? The socket directory only contains a handful o
On Nov 29, 2007, at 21:34, Vincent Fox wrote:
> We had sym-linked imap/proc directory to a size-limited
> TMPFS a while back.
>
> Now I'm thinking to do the same for imap/socket and imap/log
>
> Any reasons against? Other candidates?
You're probably not going to see wins on the socket data, sin
We had sym-linked imap/proc directory to a size-limited
TMPFS a while back.
Now I'm thinking to do the same for imap/socket and imap/log
Any reasons against? Other candidates?
Cyrus Home Page: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/
Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/twiki
List Archives/In
