Re: Tru64 and 2.2 problems - cast-to-union

2003-07-25 Thread Nikola Milutinovic
> Just to add an oppinion. > >> I do not and cannot accept the point "GCC is standard - yield to it". GCC >> is "yet another C language standard" and should be treated that way. So >> far we have K&R C, ANSI C, ISO C and GNU C. I would welcome emerging of >> ONE C standard, but then we should all p

Re: Tru64 and 2.2 problems - cast-to-union

2003-07-24 Thread Robert Urban
Scott Adkins wrote: > Yes, this is a concern for me... I am not exactly sure how this will be > stored in Tru64. We are talking about a "char *" and an "int" stored in > the same location. I have always known them to consume 4 bytes of memory, > but my manager isn't so sure, thinking that maybe

Re: Tru64 and 2.2 problems - cast-to-union

2003-07-24 Thread Scott Adkins
--On Wednesday, July 23, 2003 11:23 AM +0100 Christos Soulios <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I also compiled cyrus-imapd-2.2.1-BETA on a Solaris 9 box with Forte C compiler. I had some of the same problems, which come from the fact that cyrus is mostly gcc compiler oriented. [text deleted about (unio