* U5 VirusKill * Re: autocreatequota - does it really work?

2002-11-19 Thread Christos Soulios
: Re: autocreatequota - does it really work? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=-MOQ1037367266a37e8a668a0ad1fd3e90b9baa851c1cf User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.1 Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Precedence: bulk This message is in MIME format

Re: autocreatequota - does it really work?

2002-11-19 Thread Simon Matter
I like the createonpost feature very much. It makes life easier for everybody storing user accounts in LDAP or some kind of DB. No need to always call cyradm somehow through webinterface or CLI after creating a user in the directory. Is there a chance this patch makes it into the official source

Re: autocreatequota - does it really work?

2002-11-19 Thread Ken Murchison
Simon Matter wrote: I like the createonpost feature very much. It makes life easier for everybody storing user accounts in LDAP or some kind of DB. No need to always call cyradm somehow through webinterface or CLI after creating a user in the directory. Is there a chance this patch

Re: autocreatequota - does it really work?

2002-11-19 Thread Voutsinas Nikos
I like the createonpost feature very much. It makes life easier for everybody storing user accounts in LDAP or some kind of DB. No need to always call cyradm somehow through webinterface or CLI after creating a user in the directory. Is there a chance this patch makes it into the official source

Re: autocreatequota - does it really work?

2002-11-19 Thread Simon Matter
Voutsinas Nikos schrieb: I like the createonpost feature very much. It makes life easier for everybody storing user accounts in LDAP or some kind of DB. No need to always call cyradm somehow through webinterface or CLI after creating a user in the directory. Is there a chance this

Re: autocreatequota - does it really work?

2002-11-15 Thread Christos Soulios
In my opinion features such as autocreate must not be implemented by clients, but by the imap server. This way a lot of problems due to incompatibilities of the various MUAs on the naming of the INBOX subfolders and the policies on the inbox creation are avoided. Below I attach you some patches

* U5 VirusKill * Re: autocreatequota - does it really work?

2002-11-15 Thread Christos Soulios
] by webmail.uoa.gr with HTTP; Fri, 15 Nov 2002 13:34:26 + Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 13:34:26 + From: Christos Soulios [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: autocreatequota - does it really work? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content

Re: autocreatequota - does it really work?

2002-11-15 Thread Voutsinas Nikos
Let me repost the patch. Patch installation: cd into the directory where cyrus-imapd-2.1.10 resides, and then execute: /usr/local/bin/patch -p0 edunet-autocreate PS: Once you have applied the patch, please remove the int autocreatequota in cmd_create, otherwise you ll get the following

Re: autocreatequota - does it really work? [once again]

2002-11-15 Thread Voutsinas Nikos
Please ignore our previous patch ( it only works with the use of some libraries implemented for internal use ). I am sorry for the inconvenience but, beleive me, if you apply the following patch everything will work as Christos promished. So once again: Patch installation: cd into the

Re: autocreatequota - does it really work?

2002-11-14 Thread Rob Siemborski
On 14 Nov 2002, Scott Douglass wrote: I've been wondering for a while if the /etc/imapd.conf option: autocreatequota is actually implemented (I'm running 2.1.9 right now). It isn't working on any of my servers. No quota is set for new user.names. Anyone have any experience with this? It

Re: autocreatequota - does it really work?

2002-11-14 Thread Jonathan Marsden
On 14 Nov 2002, Rob Siemborski writes: On 14 Nov 2002, Scott Douglass wrote: I've been wondering for a while if the /etc/imapd.conf option: autocreatequota is actually implemented (I'm running 2.1.9 right now). It isn't working on any of my servers. No quota is set for new user.names.

Re: autocreatequota - does it really work?

2002-11-14 Thread Lawrence Greenfield
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 11:16:41 -0800 (PST) From: Jonathan Marsden [EMAIL PROTECTED] [...] The name of the option is potentially confusing, in that the desired mailbox is not 100% *automatically* created. Rather, it is only created when the new user logs in and issues a CREATE