> On Tue, 17 Dec 2002 20:28:57 -0600,
> archive info-cyrus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (ai) writes:
ai> --On Tuesday, December 17, 2002 4:24 PM -0800 Jonathan Marsden
ai> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
ai> | So the question becomes: what, if anything can non-CMU people do that
ai> | would help caus
On Wed, 18 Dec 2002, Ken Murchison wrote:
> Its not a matter of CMU needing/using virtdomain support. CMU is not
> using altnamespace or unixhiersep stuff in 2.1, and that was released.
Well, yes, but we did have an interest in moving to SASL2. Though I still
agree that what we run internally o
Jonathan Marsden wrote:
>
> On 13 Dec 2002, Jure Pecar writes:
>
> > On Thu, 12 Dec 2002 20:31:41 -0500 Ken Murchison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> I addition to what Rob already mentioned, there needs to be more
> >> work done on documenting the virtdomain support and tying some
> >> loos
--On Tuesday, December 17, 2002 4:24 PM -0800 Jonathan Marsden
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| So the question becomes: what, if anything can non-CMU people do that
| would help cause a release of 2.2 (or 2.1 with virtdomains in it??) to
| happen sooner rather than later?
Just a guess... send Ken s
On 13 Dec 2002, Jure Pecar writes:
> On Thu, 12 Dec 2002 20:31:41 -0500 Ken Murchison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I addition to what Rob already mentioned, there needs to be more
>> work done on documenting the virtdomain support and tying some
>> loose ends.
> Yes, virtdomains are actually
On Fri, 13 Dec 2002, John Alton Tamplin wrote:
> Rob Siemborski wrote:
>
> >But unless the contents of the folders are backed up in this way too, you
> >haven't really gained a significant amount, since the transactions that
> >cyrus needs to make rely on the contents of the filesystem as well.
>
Rob Siemborski wrote:
But unless the contents of the folders are backed up in this way too, you
haven't really gained a significant amount, since the transactions that
cyrus needs to make rely on the contents of the filesystem as well.
True, although with the metadata secure you can politely t
On Thu, 12 Dec 2002, John Alton Tamplin wrote:
> Well, most real databases offer online backup capability so you can get
> a robust backup even while processing transactions, and with continuous
> log backup a crash can't lose any committed transactions.
But unless the contents of the folders are
On Thu, 12 Dec 2002 20:31:41 -0500
Ken Murchison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I addition to what Rob already mentioned, there needs to be more work
> done on documenting the virtdomain support and tying some loose ends.
Yes, virtdomains are actually the #1 thing i'm interested in cyrus 2.2 ...
I'
Jure Pecar wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> what is the current status of the cyrus 2.2 cvs branch? judging by the cvs
> commits lately, there are just various little cleanups here and there ... is
> there anything big left on the TODO list for 2.2?
I addition to what Rob already mentioned, there needs
Rob Siemborski wrote:
The only *possible* advantage I see is it gets cyrus's databases backed up
with an SQL database, but since you still have to back up the cyrus
datastore anyway, you haven't won anything.
Well, most real databases offer online backup capability so you can get
a robust bac
On Thu, 12 Dec 2002, Jure Pecar wrote:
> what is the current status of the cyrus 2.2 cvs branch? judging by the cvs
> commits lately, there are just various little cleanups here and there ... is
> there anything big left on the TODO list for 2.2?
The big one is getting the sieve bytecode support
Hi all,
what is the current status of the cyrus 2.2 cvs branch? judging by the cvs
commits lately, there are just various little cleanups here and there ... is
there anything big left on the TODO list for 2.2?
my little wish would be the sql cyrusdb interface, discussed here a week or
two ago, ev
13 matches
Mail list logo
