Re: deliver vs LMTP for shared folders

2005-05-13 Thread Ken Murchison
Scott Balmos wrote: Ken Murchison wrote: Scott Balmos wrote: Hi all, This is probably a bad subject line for the topic, but I can't think of a better one. I've always heard, between here and on the Postfix list, that delivering directly via LMTP to Cyrus is better than using the deliver wrapper

Re: deliver vs LMTP for shared folders

2005-05-13 Thread Scott Balmos
Ken Murchison wrote: Scott Balmos wrote: Hi all, This is probably a bad subject line for the topic, but I can't think of a better one. I've always heard, between here and on the Postfix list, that delivering directly via LMTP to Cyrus is better than using the deliver wrapper program. I was curio

Re: deliver vs LMTP for shared folders

2005-05-13 Thread Ken Murchison
Scott Balmos wrote: Hi all, This is probably a bad subject line for the topic, but I can't think of a better one. I've always heard, between here and on the Postfix list, that delivering directly via LMTP to Cyrus is better than using the deliver wrapper program. I was curious how much of a perf

deliver vs LMTP for shared folders

2005-05-12 Thread Scott Balmos
Hi all, This is probably a bad subject line for the topic, but I can't think of a better one. I've always heard, between here and on the Postfix list, that delivering directly via LMTP to Cyrus is better than using the deliver wrapper program. I was curious how much of a performance hit there i