I just wanted to see if it was normal to see the deliver db get this
big...
SNIP
-rw---1 cyrusmail 50M Jul 25 11:04 deliver.db
SNIP
Cheers,
Mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Fri, 25 Jul 2003, Mike Cathey wrote:
> I just wanted to see if it was normal to see the deliver db get this
> big...
Yes. It's keeping track of every delivered message (also, if you're using
berkeley or skiplist there may be a lot of 'unused' space that the
database just doesn't bother deallo
On Fri, 25 Jul 2003, Mike Cathey wrote:
> I just wanted to see if it was normal to see the deliver db get this
> big...
> SNIP
> -rw---1 cyrusmail 50M Jul 25 11:04 deliver.db
> SNIP
>
It will get as big as you let it to. Depends on frequency of prunning, and
On Fri, 2003-07-25 at 17:46, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Jul 2003, Mike Cathey wrote:
> > I just wanted to see if it was normal to see the deliver db get this
> > big...
> It will get as big as you let it to. Depends on frequency of prunning, and
> the ammount of traffic throug
To finish that statement "... so it can make a half decent attempt at
single message store".
On Fri, 25 Jul 2003, Rob Siemborski wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Jul 2003, Mike Cathey wrote:
>
> > I just wanted to see if it was normal to see the deliver db get this
> > big...
>
> Yes. It's keeping track o
Tarjei Huse wrote:
On Fri, 2003-07-25 at 17:46, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
On Fri, 25 Jul 2003, Mike Cathey wrote:
I just wanted to see if it was normal to see the deliver db get this
big...
It will get as big as you let it to. Depends on frequency of prunning, and
the ammount of traf
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, 25 Jul 2003, Mike Cathey wrote:
>> I just wanted to see if it was normal to see the deliver db get this
>> big...
>
>> SNIP
>> -rw---1 cyrusmail 50M Jul 25 11:04 deliver.db
>> SNIP
>>
>
> It wil
Jeff Warnica wrote:
To finish that statement "... so it can make a half decent attempt at
single message store".
Actually, its not used for single instance store at all. This happens
before the message-id is committed to the database. Hence, it only
works for recipients that are part of the s
On Fri, 2003-07-25 at 19:17, Ken Murchison wrote:
> Jeff Warnica wrote:
> > To finish that statement "... so it can make a half decent attempt at
> > single message store".
>
> Actually, its not used for single instance store at all. This happens
> before the message-id is committed to the datab
