Hi,
Quoting Wolfgang Breyha via Info-cyrus :
Michael Menge via Info-cyrus wrote on 07/11/16 10:30:
Quoting Alberto Cardenas via Info-cyrus :
I'm trying to setup Cyrus Murder for testing and have three virtual
machines for this purpose (frontend, mupdate and backend). The three
machines are r
Michael Menge via Info-cyrus wrote on 07/11/16 10:30:
> Quoting Alberto Cardenas via Info-cyrus :
>
>> I'm trying to setup Cyrus Murder for testing and have three virtual
>> machines for this purpose (frontend, mupdate and backend). The three
>> machines are running Centos 6.5, SASL 2.1.23 and
forwarding requests to the backend
Hi,Quoting Alberto Cardenas via Info-cyrus :>
Hello,>>> I'm trying to setup Cyrus Murder for testing and have three virtual
> machines for this purpose (frontend, mupdate and backend). The three >
machines are running Centos 6.5, SASL
xes.
The problem seems to be between the frontend and the backend since
the frontend is not forwarding the imap requests to the backend. To
test this, I am using the command “telnet localhost 143” on the
frontend server. Once that I get connected and authenticated, I
issue the command “se
e
is working fine since I can list the mailboxes created in the backend using the
“cyradm -u cyrus localhost” and “lm” commands, which shows the same user’s
mailboxes result on the three boxes.
The problem seems to be between the frontend and the backend since the frontend
is not forwarding the
On 02 Apr 2008, at 09:00, Joseph Brennan wrote:
> The crucial difference is that if one writes a bad procmail recipe,
> the message loops round and round until one of the MTAs considers
> the hop count exceeded and bounces it to sender, but if one writes
> a bad sieve rule, the message _is silently
Matt Garretson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Along similar lines, any well-written Procmail recipe which redirects
> mail typically checks for, or adds, an "X-Loop" header before
> forwarding anything.
Yes, it's an old solution.
The crucial difference is that if on
tpd inserted a "X-Been-Here"
> type header as it hands off to the MTA, so that it could detect a
> loop the first time the message comes back.
Along similar lines, any well-written Procmail recipe which redirects
mail typically checks for, or adds, an "X-Loop" header be
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 11:52:10AM -0400, Ken Murchison wrote:
> Gary Mills wrote:
> >Once again, we had somebody use the sieve facility to redirect e-mail
> >back to the same mailbox and then go on vacation. This sets up a
> >forwarding loop which cyrus breaks by discardin
On Mar 31, 2008, at 5:40 AM, Joseph Brennan wrote:
>
> A mail delivery system that loses mail is buggy. I don't need to look
> at the code to know that.
And knives that cut people are bad. No matter how they are used.
*whatever*
plonk.
--
Jo Rhett
Net Consonance : consonant endings by net
about this one?
> >
> > discard;
> >
> >
> > It turns out that a mail delivery system that has been configured in a
> > way that loses mail has a bug _in_the_person_who_configured_it_. Now
> > it may be that the language makes it easy to shoot yourself in
know - pick me. How about this one?
>
> discard;
>
>
> It turns out that a mail delivery system that has been configured in a
> way that loses mail has a bug _in_the_person_who_configured_it_. Now
> it may be that the language makes it easy to shoot yourself in the foot,
> but th
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 04:21:20PM +0200, Alain Spineux wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 2:40 PM, Joseph Brennan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Jo Rhett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > I would ask that you spend some time determining how the
> > > program could determine it is a bad ru
On 31 Mar 2008, at 11:52, Ken Murchison wrote:
> How can
> lmtpd be intelligent enough to know that the forwarded address will
> cause the message to come back?
There's no way to do that, but one could insert a header, e.g, "X-
Sieve-Redirect". Maybe the value would be a random string which was
t;
>
> In case [1], user X forwards to an external address which forwards back
> to user X. This could be solved by not suppressing duplicates when
> forwarding to external addresses. Instead the loop would be stopped
> by exceeding the hop count in the MTA, and the MTA would bounc
X. This could be solved by not suppressing duplicates when
forwarding to external addresses. Instead the loop would be stopped
by exceeding the hop count in the MTA, and the MTA would bounce. This
emulates what happens with .forward or .procmailrc loops.
In case [2], user X forwards to user X. If lmt
Gary Mills wrote:
> Once again, we had somebody use the sieve facility to redirect e-mail
> back to the same mailbox and then go on vacation. This sets up a
> forwarding loop which cyrus breaks by discarding the e-mail. During
> this vacation, all of the person's e
worse than backscatter. With bounces limited to
> people who get a forward loop going, bounces are not a big issue.
>
>
>
>
> Gary Mills <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > Of course,
> > it's impossible to distinguish between a forwarding loop and a real
&
CTED]> wrote:
> > > > Once again, we had somebody use the sieve facility to redirect e-mail
> > > > back to the same mailbox and then go on vacation. This sets up a
> > > > forwarding loop which cyrus breaks by discarding the e-mail. During
> > >
tter.
Losing mail is much worse than backscatter. With bounces limited to
people who get a forward loop going, bounces are not a big issue.
Gary Mills <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Of course,
> it's impossible to distinguish between a forwarding loop and a real
> duplicate
ve facility to redirect e-mail
> > > back to the same mailbox and then go on vacation. This sets up a
> > > forwarding loop which cyrus breaks by discarding the e-mail. During
> > > this vacation, all of the person's e-mail disappeared.
> >
> > If you for
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 02:27:29PM +0100, Alain Spineux wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 5:39 PM, Gary Mills <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Once again, we had somebody use the sieve facility to redirect e-mail
> > back to the same mailbox and then go on vacation. This sets
Joseph Brennan wrote:
> No, it is just totally wrong that an action other than 'discard' will
> result in mail silently vanishing. Maybe this is what does happen, but
> it is not what _should_ happen as was asked. It _should_ either go to
> inbox (grounds: ignore a bad rule)
You are assuming tha
--On Sunday, March 30, 2008 2:27 PM +0100 Alain Spineux
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Shouldn't we have a better solution to this problem? Some people
>> expect that forwarding e-mail to yourself should work; nobody expects
>> the messages to vanish without
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 5:39 PM, Gary Mills <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Once again, we had somebody use the sieve facility to redirect e-mail
> back to the same mailbox and then go on vacation. This sets up a
> forwarding loop which cyrus breaks by discarding the e-mail.
Once again, we had somebody use the sieve facility to redirect e-mail
back to the same mailbox and then go on vacation. This sets up a
forwarding loop which cyrus breaks by discarding the e-mail. During
this vacation, all of the person's e-mail disappeared.
Shouldn't we have a bette
Hi,
Quoting Rajeev R Veedu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I have a Cyrus installation with postfix and open xchange. I get the mails
from catchall account with procmail and distribute with the mail server. Now
I have a new site office where couples of staff members are going to be
relocated.
Since we ha
Rajeev R Veedu schrieb:
Since we have only an ADSL line on site office if there any way I could
forward the mails for these staff members to another Mail Server with
dynamic IP address?
Use a dyndns service [1] to make the remote ADSL IP resolvable by name
and forward directly to that, then
I have a Cyrus installation with postfix and open xchange. I
get the mails from catchall account with procmail and distribute with the mail
server. Now I have a new site office where couples of staff members are going
to be relocated.
Since we have only an ADSL line on site office if ther
Hi there,
I'm running cyrus 2.2.12 and 2.2.13.
Even I have read all Cyrus doc, I have found no way to get the
forwarding and vacation processing properly running.
I'd really appreciate some help with this.
Thanks in advanced,
Eduardo
Cyrus Home Page: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/c
Ramprasad wrote:
Hi,
We have a cyrus installation( on linux redhat 9) with around 110k
mailboxes. I want to allow users to setup forwarding to different email
ids ( probably more than 1 )
Can I setup sieve so that the email forwarded will have special text
attached to it ?
You can'
Hi,
We have a cyrus installation( on linux redhat 9) with around 110k
mailboxes. I want to allow users to setup forwarding to different email
ids ( probably more than 1 )
Can I setup sieve so that the email forwarded will have special text
attached to it ?
Also I am not sure how sieve
On Mon, 1 Sep 2003, Ramprasad A Padmanabhan wrote:
> How can I use sieve for forwarding to multiple email ids
You can use multiple "redirect" clauses in a single sieve file. At least,
that works for me.
--
David Carter Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Univers
How can I use sieve for forwarding to multiple email ids
Thanks
Ram
Hi!
I think SmartSieve supports forwarding.
That is, supports over web sieve filter making
so that it forwards...
Regards,
Toomas
-Original Message-
From: sandra [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 15. juuli 2003. a. 23:50
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: sieve software
Hi People,
I wonder what is the sieve software package that offers mail
forwarding
option , because I'm using websieve 0.61 and it doesn't have it. And
I have found at Internet sites that there are some sieve packages that
does it.
Does anybody know anyone to informe me?
Thanks a lot.
Yes, yes. Please ignore my question, I was making a stupid error.
> What MTA do you use to deliver to cyrus? It could be sendmail, and then
> it's still easy and done exactly as you used to do it.
>
> Mikael
>
> On Thu, 23 Jan 2003 at 10:53, Mark London wrote:
>
> > On linux running cyrus, I w
What MTA do you use to deliver to cyrus? It could be sendmail, and then
it's still easy and done exactly as you used to do it.
Mikael
On Thu, 23 Jan 2003 at 10:53, Mark London wrote:
> On linux running cyrus, I want to have mail forwarded for any unknown user to
> another IP name. In other word
On linux running cyrus, I want to have mail forwarded for any unknown user to
another IP name. In other words, if user foo doesn't exist on the system, I
want mail forwarded to foo@bar. Easy to do with sendmail without cyrus, but
I haven't found anything that works with cyrus installed. Any sug
We have recently noticed strange behaviour with our cyrus-imapd-1.0.14
installation. Lmtpd does not seem to forward auto-generated error messages
properly. When a cyrus-imap user sends a mail to a non-existent address, the other
MTA will typically respond with an error message with a null envelope
ions.
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Hein Roehrig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Mike Grommet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 9:06 AM
> Subject: Re: prevention of forwarding loops in
Sorry, my advice/information is based on Cyrus 2.1.3. AFAIK the
duplicate suppression has been there for a long time but possibly not
the configuration option. Probably somebody in the group will comment on
that in a second :-)
Regards,
Hein
On Tue, 2002-04-23 at 16:52, Mike Grommet wrote:
> Is
CTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 9:06 AM
Subject: Re: prevention of forwarding loops in sieve
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Cyrus (by default) prevents repeated delivery of the same message by
> storing the message id of inco
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Cyrus (by default) prevents repeated delivery of the same message by
storing the message id of incoming messages and discarding any message
with a previously seen id (to the same user.) See duplicatesuppression
in imapd.conf(5)
- -Hein
"Mike Gromme
Mike Grommet wrote:
>
> I'm sure someone has handled this one in the past, so I ask for a canned
> example if possible.
>
> Sieve and Cyrus are happily working together, but reading the sieve rfc, it
> mentions that I need to handle the prevention of fowarding loops...
>
> mailbox1 --> mailbo
I'm sure someone has handled this one in the past, so I ask for a canned
example if possible.
Sieve and Cyrus are happily working together, but reading the sieve rfc, it
mentions that I need to handle the prevention of fowarding loops...
mailbox1 --> mailbox2
but
mailbox2 --> mailbox1
or even
m
PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: Mail forwarding without '.forward'
The easiest way to do this is with sieve. (Built in to cyrus 2.X)
Users can access a simple tool like easysieve from a web browser to set
the forwarding address.Also supports fancier features like vacation
autore
The easiest way to do this is with sieve. (Built in to cyrus 2.X)
Users can access a simple tool like easysieve from a web browser to set
the forwarding address.Also supports fancier features like vacation
autoreplies, etc.
Hope this helps,
John Wade
LF wrote:
>I would appreci
On 9 December 2001, LF <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would appreciate some advise here.
>
> I was trying to migrate from qmail to cyrus imap (with postfix) when
> I encounter this problem. If users request for the auto-forwarding
> feature (".forward" support
I would appreciate some advise here.
I was trying to migrate from qmail to cyrus imap (with postfix) when I
encounter this problem. If users request for the auto-forwarding feature
(".forward" supported by postfix), does cyrus imap server support
mail forwarding? I don't wann
THANKS!
-Original Message-
From: Jules Agee [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 7:11 PM
To: info-cyrus
Subject:Re: forwarding
Sieve scripts?
http://www.cyrusoft.com/sieve/
Kiarna Boyd wrote:
>Hi!
>I have 2.0.16 and sendmail 8 on Solaris 7.
&
Sieve scripts?
http://www.cyrusoft.com/sieve/
Kiarna Boyd wrote:
>Hi!
>I have 2.0.16 and sendmail 8 on Solaris 7.
>
>I am looking for a graceful solution for .forwards.
>Anyone have a better solution than the traditional home dir .forward?
>
>Thanks!
>
>-Kiarna
>
>
--
Jules Agee
System Admini
LDAP routing. =)
sendmail.net has a couple article on it.
Greg
On Tue, Oct 23, 2001 at 03:18:00PM -0400, Kiarna Boyd wrote:
> Hi!
> I have 2.0.16 and sendmail 8 on Solaris 7.
>
> I am looking for a graceful solution for .forwards.
> Anyone have a better solution than the traditional home dir .
Hi!
I have 2.0.16 and sendmail 8 on Solaris 7.
I am looking for a graceful solution for .forwards.
Anyone have a better solution than the traditional home dir .forward?
Thanks!
-Kiarna
... while talking to mail.postgresql.org.:
>>> RCPT To:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<<< 554 5.4.6 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... aliasing/forwarding loop
broken (11 aliases deep; 10 max)
554 5.0.0 Service unavailable
Hi ...
I'm figuring that the problem has some
The cyrusv2.mc distributed in 2.0.7 was suboptimal. The current
suggestion is to remove the "5" flag from the Cyrus mailer. You can
see the cyrusv2.mc distributed with 2.0.9 as an example.
Sorry,
Larry
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 14:18:55 -0400 (AST)
From: The Hermit Hacker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 13 Dec 2000, Michael Yount wrote:
> Marc,
>
> I just tried eliminating the following rule from a test sendmail.cf
> on mail.postgresql.org, and it appears to have solved the problem.
> I'm not sure why this rule would create a rewriting loop.
>
> Michael
>
> :}
> :}LOCAL_RULESETS
>
$+ < @ $=w . >$#cyrus $: + $1
LOCAL_RULESETS
# if there's a plus part, we want to directly deliver it
SLocal_localaddr
R$+ + $*$#cyrus $@ $: $1 + $2
===
On Tue, 12 Dec 2000, Michael Yount wrote:
> From mail.postgresql.org:
>
> expn pgsql-admin-owner+M2
From: "Ken Murchison" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "The Hermit Hacker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Jeff MacDonald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2000 9:21 AM
Subject: Re: forwarding all email through sieve/webseive ...
On Thu, 2 Nov 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Peter M. Jansson writes, regarding e-mail forwarding:
> >
> >Sendmail is really good at this -- enable the USERDB feature, and create
> >an entry that maps the destination to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]". It's a lot
>
Peter M. Jansson writes, regarding e-mail forwarding:
>
>Sendmail is really good at this -- enable the USERDB feature, and create
>an entry that maps the destination to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]". It's a lot
>lighter weight on the server to allow sendmail to do it, too.
Yes,
On Thu, 2 Nov 2000, Gary Mills wrote:
> >redirect "[EMAIL PROTECTED]";
>
> This is likely a very common requirement, second only to vacation.
> It would be wonderful if websieve could do it in non-advanced mode.
Sendmail is really good at this -- enable the USERDB feature, and create
an entry
Kenneth Murchison writes:
>
>The easiest way to do this is to use websieve in advanced mode (or edit
>a script by hand and use installsieve) and create the following one line
>script:
>redirect "[EMAIL PROTECTED]";
This is likely a very common requirement, second only to vacation.
It would be wo
The Hermit Hacker wrote:
>
> Trying to setup a forward that forwards all email from a user to another
> user ... rule we are trying is:
>
> IF Field(s): 'From' matches '*'
> THEN Redirect To '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
I'm assuming that this is paraphrased from the websieve GUI, because
this is not v
Trying to setup a forward that forwards all email from a user to another
user ... rule we are trying is:
IF Field(s): 'From' matches '*'
THEN Redirect To '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
seems logical to me, but doesn't appear to work ..
should it, or should I be doing this a different way?
thanks
Marc
You need to remove the '5' from your mailer flags..
MAILER_DEFINITIONS
Mcyrus, P=[IPC], F=lsDFMnqA5@/:|SmXz, E=\r\n,
should be
MAILER_DEFINITIONS
Mcyrus, P=[IPC], F=lsDFMnqA@/:|SmXz, E=\r\n,
66 matches
Mail list logo
