Re: prevention of forwarding loops in sieve

2002-04-23 Thread Ken Murchison
ions. > > - Original Message - > From: "Hein Roehrig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Mike Grommet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 9:06 AM > Subject: Re: prevention of forwarding loops in

Re: prevention of forwarding loops in sieve

2002-04-23 Thread Hein Roehrig
Sorry, my advice/information is based on Cyrus 2.1.3. AFAIK the duplicate suppression has been there for a long time but possibly not the configuration option. Probably somebody in the group will comment on that in a second :-) Regards, Hein On Tue, 2002-04-23 at 16:52, Mike Grommet wrote: > Is

Re: prevention of forwarding loops in sieve

2002-04-23 Thread Mike Grommet
CTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 9:06 AM Subject: Re: prevention of forwarding loops in sieve > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Cyrus (by default) prevents repeated delivery of the same message by > storing the message id of inco

Re: prevention of forwarding loops in sieve

2002-04-23 Thread Hein Roehrig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Cyrus (by default) prevents repeated delivery of the same message by storing the message id of incoming messages and discarding any message with a previously seen id (to the same user.) See duplicatesuppression in imapd.conf(5) - -Hein "Mike Gromme

Re: prevention of forwarding loops in sieve

2002-04-23 Thread Ken Murchison
Mike Grommet wrote: > > I'm sure someone has handled this one in the past, so I ask for a canned > example if possible. > > Sieve and Cyrus are happily working together, but reading the sieve rfc, it > mentions that I need to handle the prevention of fowarding loops... > > mailbox1 --> mailbo

prevention of forwarding loops in sieve

2002-04-23 Thread Mike Grommet
I'm sure someone has handled this one in the past, so I ask for a canned example if possible. Sieve and Cyrus are happily working together, but reading the sieve rfc, it mentions that I need to handle the prevention of fowarding loops... mailbox1 --> mailbox2 but mailbox2 --> mailbox1 or even m