On Thu, 12 Jun 2003, Stephen Grier wrote:
> third party returned the read-receipt. It seems that when the third
> party then replied to the original message, lmtpd suppressed it because
> it contained a message-id identical to the one on the read-receipt sent
[...]
> non-standard, so I don't know
Hi,
We're currently running cyrus-imapd-2.1.11 with duplicate delivery
suppression enabled.
We recently received a complaint from a user who reported not receiving
a message he was sent. On investigation, it seems that he initially sent
a message to a third party along with a request for a read-r
