Zitat von Michael Loftis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I never said that it *wasn't* I just said I didn't know if it was. The
two are not the same. I've not used the newer sync replication so I
don't know any of the gotchas or anything like that.
Uhmm .. yes, I'm also not quite sure that it will work
--On July 26, 2006 7:23:38 AM +0200 "Heiling, Steffen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Zitat von Michael Loftis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I'm not sure if your entire plan is safe, however, reconstruct is safe.
An individual mailbox or folder just gets locked during the actual
reconstruct. Note that
Zitat von Michael Loftis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I'm not sure if your entire plan is safe, however, reconstruct is safe.
An individual mailbox or folder just gets locked during the actual
reconstruct. Note that it'll increase your I/O load by a pretty large
amount during the reconstruct.
Why isn
Michael Loftis wrote:
--On July 25, 2006 3:37:43 PM +0200 "Heiling, Steffen"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm just wondering if I can run "reconstruct -r" for all mailboxes
while
the system is running with mid load? I want to switch all mailboxes
to a
new server with more space and without a b
--On July 25, 2006 3:37:43 PM +0200 "Heiling, Steffen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Dear List,
I'm just wondering if I can run "reconstruct -r" for all mailboxes while
the system is running with mid load? I want to switch all mailboxes to a
new server with more space and without a big downt
Dear List,
I'm just wondering if I can run "reconstruct -r" for all mailboxes
while the system is running with mid load? I want to switch all
mailboxes to a new server with more space and without a big downtime.
I would do a sync (with replication) and after that, reroute
connections with i
