Re: Memory leak/CPU load (Was: servername not honored in imapd.c?)

2006-02-14 Thread Simon Matter
> Quoting Simon Matter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> Unfortunately I also found a server having problem with it. That's why I >> have removed the new package again. >> In my case one imapd process was in a loop consuming gigabytes of memory >> until it was killed by the kernel. This happened again and

Memory leak/CPU load (Was: servername not honored in imapd.c?)

2006-02-14 Thread Aleksandar Milivojevic
Quoting Simon Matter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Unfortunately I also found a server having problem with it. That's why I have removed the new package again. In my case one imapd process was in a loop consuming gigabytes of memory until it was killed by the kernel. This happened again and again. I atta

Re: servername not honored in imapd.c?

2006-02-10 Thread Simon Matter
> (Apologies, meant to send this to the list) > > -- Forwarded message -- > Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 12:31:59 -0500 (EST) > From: Steve Huston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Simon Matter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: servername not honored in imapd.

Re: servername not honored in imapd.c?

2006-02-10 Thread Steve Huston
(Apologies, meant to send this to the list) -- Forwarded message -- Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 12:31:59 -0500 (EST) From: Steve Huston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Simon Matter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: servername not honored in imapd.c? On Fri, 10 Feb 2006, Simon

Re: servername not honored in imapd.c?

2006-02-10 Thread Simon Matter
> Ken Murchison wrote: >> Yup, that's a bug. I will fix it in CVS. >> > > Patch please against 2.3.1? Or a clue how to access CVS for the 2.3.1 > branch. The CVS directories in the 2.3.1 tgz seem old. My current RPM 2.3.1-3 includes updates from CVS of yesterday. Regards, Simon > > -- > Scott R

Re: servername not honored in imapd.c?

2006-02-09 Thread Ken Murchison
Scott Russell wrote: Ken Murchison wrote: Yup, that's a bug. I will fix it in CVS. Patch please against 2.3.1? Or a clue how to access CVS for the 2.3.1 branch. The CVS directories in the 2.3.1 tgz seem old. From within the cyrus-imapd-2.3.1 directory: cvs -d :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:

Re: servername not honored in imapd.c?

2006-02-08 Thread Steve Huston
On Feb 08, 2006, at 19:22, Kjetil Torgrim Homme wrote: On Wed, 2006-02-08 at 16:50 -0500, Steve Huston wrote: In debugging a problem we've got since upgrading to Cyrus 2.3.1 (among other things), I discovered that at one point Pine checks to see if the name returned by the server is equal to

Re: servername not honored in imapd.c?

2006-02-08 Thread Steve Huston
On Feb 08, 2006, at 19:59, Ken Murchison wrote: Steve Huston wrote: The relevant area in imap/imapd.c is around line 949 in void cmdloop(): Shouldn't the first prot_printf argument be "config_servername" instead of "hostname"? I don't recall having this problem on our old server, so Yup, th

Re: servername not honored in imapd.c?

2006-02-08 Thread Scott Russell
Ken Murchison wrote: Yup, that's a bug. I will fix it in CVS. Patch please against 2.3.1? Or a clue how to access CVS for the 2.3.1 branch. The CVS directories in the 2.3.1 tgz seem old. -- Scott Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> IBM Linux Technology Center Cyrus Home Page: http://asg.web.

Re: servername not honored in imapd.c?

2006-02-08 Thread Ken Murchison
Steve Huston wrote: In debugging a problem we've got since upgrading to Cyrus 2.3.1 (among other things), I discovered that at one point Pine checks to see if the name returned by the server is equal to the name that it thinks it connected to, and if not it seems to open another socket to the IM

Re: servername not honored in imapd.c?

2006-02-08 Thread Kjetil Torgrim Homme
On Wed, 2006-02-08 at 16:50 -0500, Steve Huston wrote: > In debugging a problem we've got since upgrading to Cyrus 2.3.1 (among other > things), I discovered that at one point Pine checks to see if the name > returned by the server is equal to the name that it thinks it connected to, > and if not i

servername not honored in imapd.c?

2006-02-08 Thread Steve Huston
In debugging a problem we've got since upgrading to Cyrus 2.3.1 (among other things), I discovered that at one point Pine checks to see if the name returned by the server is equal to the name that it thinks it connected to, and if not it seems to open another socket to the IMAP server. This cause

Re: servername not honored in imapd.c?

2006-02-08 Thread Steve Huston
On Wed, 8 Feb 2006, Steve Huston wrote: I don't recall having this problem on our old server, so I'm not sure if it changed I just downloaded 2.1.12 (what we were running before) and verified that it's set as config_servername and not pulled from hostname in that version, so at some point it di