Re: sync_client bails out after 3 MAILBOXES need upgrading to USER in one run

2006-09-13 Thread David Carter
On Tue, 12 Sep 2006, Wesley Craig wrote: On a related note, what was the problem with accepting the Cambridge patches for delayed folder deletion? I'm interested in working on getting that or similar code accepted. Now that we have delayed expunge for messages, we continue to run tape

Re: sync_client bails out after 3 MAILBOXES need upgrading to USER in one run

2006-09-13 Thread Bron Gondwana
On Wed, 13 Sep 2006 09:14:17 +0100 (BST), David Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: On Tue, 12 Sep 2006, Wesley Craig wrote: On a related note, what was the problem with accepting the Cambridge patches for delayed folder deletion? I'm interested in working on getting that or similar code

Re: sync_client bails out after 3 MAILBOXES need upgrading to USER in one run

2006-09-12 Thread Wesley Craig
Subject: Re: sync_client bails out after 3 MAILBOXES need upgrading to USER in one run On 29 Aug 2006, at 04:35, David Carter wrote: My original code (which we are still running: I'm not in any hurry to upgrade to 2.3) sorts mailbox actions by user. If a single mailbox action associated

Re: sync_client bails out after 3 MAILBOXES need upgrading to USER in one run

2006-09-12 Thread Kjetil Torgrim Homme
On Tue, 2006-09-12 at 10:25 -0400, Wesley Craig wrote: Now that we have delayed expunge for messages, we continue to run tape backups only for the case where users inadvertently delete folders. interesting. is one of the replicas off-site? you don't worry about EMP or stuff like that?

Re: sync_client bails out after 3 MAILBOXES need upgrading to USER in one run

2006-09-12 Thread Wesley Craig
On 12 Sep 2006, at 16:51, Kjetil Torgrim Homme wrote: interesting. is one of the replicas off-site? you don't worry about EMP or stuff like that? for how long do you keep the expunged messages? I think turning off tape backup would be a very tough sell around here... In our test runs,

Re: sync_client bails out after 3 MAILBOXES need upgrading to USER in one run

2006-08-29 Thread David Carter
On Sun, 27 Aug 2006, Bron Gondwana wrote: I've attached my trivial solution (against CVS of last week some time), but I'm thinking a better (as in, less wasteful) solution might be to not return an error at all for a failed mailbox, but instead keep walking the entire tree, and then generate

Re: sync_client bails out after 3 MAILBOXES need upgrading to USER in one run

2006-08-29 Thread Wesley Craig
On 29 Aug 2006, at 04:35, David Carter wrote: My original code (which we are still running: I'm not in any hurry to upgrade to 2.3) sorts mailbox actions by user. If a single mailbox action associated with a user fails the rest are discarded and a USER event is generated. If the USER event

RE: sync_client bails out after 3 MAILBOXES need upgrading to USER in one run

2006-08-29 Thread Ken Murchison
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Bron Gondwana [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Ken Murchison [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Info Cyrus info-cyrus@lists.andrew.cmu.edu Sent: 8/29/06 11:05 AM Subject: Re: sync_client bails out after 3 MAILBOXES need upgrading to USER in one run On 29 Aug 2006, at 04:35, David Carter wrote: My

sync_client bails out after 3 MAILBOXES need upgrading to USER in one run

2006-08-26 Thread Bron Gondwana
So I've got a huge log file, and it keeps bailing out trying to process it, but at a different place each time. Very odd. Closer inspection shows that the do_sync code calls do_mailboxes up to 3 times if there are errors, and if there is a mailbox that can be promoted to user each time, does