On 03/15/2017 02:02 PM, Patrick Hennessy wrote:
We are looking to migrate from a 2.3.7 server to a 2.4.18 server. I was
hoping to set up the cyrus murder/aggregator and move the existing
server behind that. While doing some reading and research, I came
across the following mailing list thread
Followup question to below.. If it is necessary to run an older
frontend, is it possible to use the latest 2.3 version (looks like 2.3.19)?
We're currently getting 2.3.7 though os packages that get security
updates backported, so hopefully the latest 2.3 will be okay if I need
to built from sour
We are looking to migrate from a 2.3.7 server to a 2.4.18 server. I was
hoping to set up the cyrus murder/aggregator and move the existing
server behind that. While doing some reading and research, I came
across the following mailing list thread. I was wondering if it's still
the case that the
Hi Ragnar!
Quick fun result:
The -U 1 seems to help on a 2.2 Murder frontend, but seems to do bad on
a 2.3 frontend.
This needs more work / investigation. (Scratching my head.)
Regards,
Torsten
Ragnar Sundblad schrieb:
> On 28 maj 2010, at 16.53, Torsten Schlabach wrote:
>
>> Hi Ragnar!
>>
>
On 28 maj 2010, at 19.58, Andrew Morgan wrote:
> On Fri, 28 May 2010, Ragnar Sundblad wrote:
>
>> Is murder/aggregator backwards compatible with older imap
>> servers?
>>
>> We want to migrate form a single 2.1.18 cyrus imap server to
>> multiple 2.3.x servers. An idea is to insert a common
>>
On 28 May 2010, at 10:53, Torsten Schlabach wrote:
> Unfortunately, the developers are a bit quite on this problem so far.
I doubt very much that the developers are in a good position to
reproduce this problem. If you're imagining that someone is going to
fix this with a "stare at the code fo
---
> Datum: Fri, 28 May 2010 18:14:01 +0200
> Von: Ragnar Sundblad
> An: Torsten Schlabach
> CC: info-cyrus@lists.andrew.cmu.edu, "Michael Uesbeck \\(Tascel eG\\)"
>
> Betreff: Re: upgrading with murder/aggregator
>
> On 28 maj 2010, at 16.53, Torsten Schla
On Fri, 28 May 2010, Ragnar Sundblad wrote:
> Is murder/aggregator backwards compatible with older imap
> servers?
>
> We want to migrate form a single 2.1.18 cyrus imap server to
> multiple 2.3.x servers. An idea is to insert a common
> murder/aggregator in front of both the 2.1.18 server and the
On 28 maj 2010, at 16.53, Torsten Schlabach wrote:
> Hi Ragnar!
>
>> Could this be mitigated by letting the proxys have a lifetime of only
>> one session?
>
> Possibly. I am sure if any proxyd terminates after having done its work
> (which means either after a logout or a given idle period) thi
Hi Ragnar!
> Could this be mitigated by letting the proxys have a lifetime of only
> one session?
Possibly. I am sure if any proxyd terminates after having done its work
(which means either after a logout or a given idle period) this would
prevent re-use and possibly avoid the problem in a quite
Hello Torsten!
On 28 maj 2010, at 15.51, Torsten Schlabach wrote:
> Hi Ragnar!
>
> We are currently doing exactly that. Interesting enough, starting off
> the same software version 2.1.18. IMO this is a very nice and very smart
> way to migrate, especially if the total number and size of your
>
Hi Ragnar!
We are currently doing exactly that. Interesting enough, starting off
the same software version 2.1.18. IMO this is a very nice and very smart
way to migrate, especially if the total number and size of your
mailboxes doesn't make it easy to just "qickly" copy everything over to
a new bo
Is murder/aggregator backwards compatible with older imap
servers?
We want to migrate form a single 2.1.18 cyrus imap server to
multiple 2.3.x servers. An idea is to insert a common
murder/aggregator in front of both the 2.1.18 server and the
new servers, and seamlessly migrate users. Would this
13 matches
Mail list logo
