Re: zero-fork delivery?

2001-02-19 Thread Lawrence Greenfield
endmail seem to make sendmail use "mail.local" instead. It doesn't seem to reduce fork()s. Am I misstaken? It doesn't seem very difficult to achieve zero-fork delivery. Without investigating it further, it feels as if it might reduce load on a busy system. Opinions?

Re: zero-fork delivery?

2001-02-18 Thread Miroslav Zubcic
Simon Josefsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I'm using sendmail 8.11.2 and cyrus imapd 2.0.11, currently using "deliver" as the delivery agent. This forks two processes ("deliver" and "lmtpd") for incoming mail, right? (assuming prefork=0) As far as I can tell sendmail doesn't keep the LMTP

zero-fork delivery?

2001-02-16 Thread Simon Josefsson
p between incoming connections either. Switching to FEATURE(local_lmtp) in sendmail seem to make sendmail use "mail.local" instead. It doesn't seem to reduce fork()s. Am I misstaken? It doesn't seem very difficult to achieve zero-fork delivery. Without investigating it further, it feels as