Aidan Kehoe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> There is no other way standard way to encode those headers, for non-ASCII
> text, besides RFC 2047 encoding, the process you’ve asked how to
> suppress. (And even that standard is only applied to Usenet by a process of
> widespread looking-the-other-way.)
David Sumbler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Although it has not caused a problem until recently, my use of UTF-8
> and "quoted printable" has caused problems in a newsgroup which I
> recently started using. Basically, I have been told in no uncertain
> terms to avoid them.
>
> However, I am uncle
Ar an t-aonú lá déag de mí Iúil, scríobh David Sumbler:
> [...] How do I ensure that, when posting news, my messages are sent in
> ISO-8859-1, and avoid "quoted printable"?
In the general case, you can’t do this without losing data. If you write
exclusively English, this should work, though
Although it has not caused a problem until recently, my use of UTF-8
and "quoted printable" has caused problems in a newsgroup which I
recently started using. Basically, I have been told in no uncertain
terms to avoid them.
However, I am unclear how to change this, although I have read section
3.
Ar an t-aonú lá déag de mí Iúil, scríobh Aidan Kehoe:
> This piece of advice will transform all non-ASCII characters in the relevant
> headers to a full stop, and may be enough for you if you add it to your
> initialisation file:
>
> [...]
> "Replace non-ASCII characters in the headers
Ar an dara lá déag de mí Iúil, scríobh Steven Woody:
> Steven Woody <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > if I type in non-ascii characters in the Subject line, gnus will
> > automatically encode it as something like [EMAIL PROTECTED] when the
> > article is really sent out. this is okay for
Steven Woody <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> if I type in non-ascii characters in the Subject line, gnus will
> automatically encode it as something like [EMAIL PROTECTED] when the article
> is
> really sent out. this is okay for most cases and absolutely necessary for
> email.
>
> but, i need to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Adam Sjøgren) writes:
> On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 10:32:37 +0800, Steven wrote:
>
>> today i came up to read some binary groups, but thoese articles are
>> not seems to be human readable. sample article body is just as
>> below:
>
> I'm guessing that you want to know how to decode the
Ar an t-aonú lá déag de mí Iúil, scríobh Andrzej Adam Filip:
> > It's worse because it's
> > [1] much less widely implemented than UTF-8
>
> Which specific news readers support UTF-8 but no UTF-7?
Gnus on XEmacs is one.
--
Russian has no phoneme that corresponds directly to Germanic /h
Yes
Lance
> On Sat, 09 Jul 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> It was the e-mail address shown in the debug log.
>> That was how I knew to which e-mail address to delete to
>> determine if that would solve the problem.
>
> It was this one then?
>
> re-search-forward("\"\" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>[" n
On 11 Jul 2005 18:09:35 +0200, Andrzej wrote:
>> [2] less readable when the reader doesn't know it.
> ?! I disagree.
> UTF-7 uses only prinatable characters.
Here is an example:
Original text (iso-8859-1): Frække frølår
UTF8: Frække frølår
UTF7:
Jacob Sparre Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Andrzej Adam Filip <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I am under impression than UTF-7 is better suited for usenet posts
> > than UTF-8. What is your opinion?
>
> UTF-7 may be marginally better suited, but personally I prefer an
> appropriate fixed
Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Andrzej Adam Filip <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I am under impression than UTF-7 is better suited for usenet posts than
> > UTF-8. What is your opinion?
>
> It's worse because it's
> [1] much less widely implemented than UTF-8
Which spec
Andrzej Adam Filip <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am under impression than UTF-7 is better suited for usenet posts than
> UTF-8. What is your opinion?
It's worse because it's much less widely implemented than UTF-8, and
also less readable when the reader doesn't know it.
--
__("< Ma
Andrzej Adam Filip <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am under impression than UTF-7 is better suited for usenet posts
> than UTF-8. What is your opinion?
UTF-7 may be marginally better suited, but personally I prefer an
appropriate fixed-width encoding (in my case mostly ISO-8859-1).
Greetings,
J
Hello,
Is there any way to use yahoogroups with nnwarchive backend ?
I've googled but found no clear answer except one from ShengHuo Zhu from
2002 :
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/gnus.ding/msg/31010b7063af4a40?hl=en&;
Regards
Éric Masson
--
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
How to set up UTF-7 encoding for non ASCI posts?
[ Thanks in advance for the links ]
I am under impression than UTF-7 is better suited for usenet posts than
UTF-8. What is your opinion?
--
Andrzej [en:Andrew] Adam Filip [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
All that is necessary for the triumph o
On Sat, 09 Jul 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> It was the e-mail address shown in the debug log.
> That was how I knew to which e-mail address to delete to
> determine if that would solve the problem.
It was this one then?
re-search-forward("\"\" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>[" nil t)
Ted
== Posted
On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 10:32:37 +0800, Steven wrote:
> today i came up to read some binary groups, but thoese articles are
> not seems to be human readable. sample article body is just as
> below:
I'm guessing that you want to know how to decode these articles? They
are "uuencoded", and you can deco
19 matches
Mail list logo
