Thanks for the tip, David.
I'll check it out.
Cheers.
Ross
David <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ross A. Laird) writes:
>> I would use mairix as another alternative, but I understand there's
>> been issues between mairix and gnus.
>
> There shouldn't anymore if you use the nnm
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ross A. Laird) writes:
> I would use mairix as another alternative, but I understand there's
> been issues between mairix and gnus.
There shouldn't anymore if you use the nnmairix backend:
http://www.emacswiki.org/cgi-bin/emacs-en/GnusMairix
If you have problems with it, just
Tassilo Horn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hm, after I've written this I tried OfflineIMAP and I really like it.
> Till now, it didn't do weird things. ;-)
>
Well, in general I think it's an excellent program. Perhaps the issue
was with my server, the IMAP version, or various other things. And th
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ross A. Laird) writes:
Hi Ross,
>> Another solution that might be even faster for large amounts of mail
>> may be a local imap proxy (i.e. OfflineIMAP [1]).
>
> Actually I have tried this method, but offlineimap has, on a couple of
> occasions, done weird things to my mail dire
Thanks for the response;
> Is the IMAP server agentized?
Yes.
But still, large mail directories take 5 to 10 minutes at least.
> Another solution that might be even faster for large amounts of mail may
> be a local imap proxy (i.e. OfflineIMAP [1]).
Actually I have tried this method, but offli
Ted Zlatanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, 27 Nov 2007 13:34:02 -0600 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> r> Tassilo Horn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> Of course, that's not automatically.
>
> r> Thanks, but automating it is what my question is about.
>
> Using C-h k, figure out the functions
