Thien-Thi Nguyen writes:
> For the record, the workaround is to avoid "foo/*" in ~/.mailcap,
> replacing it with the expanded set:
>
> image/jpeg; COMMAND; ETC
> image/gif; COMMAND; ETC
> image/...; COMMAND; ETC
Sure, but that's pretty annoying to have to do.
--
(domestic pets only, the ant
Lars Ingebrigtsen writes:
> Me neither. But looking at the nnir things in
> `gnus-summary-line-format-alist', that does look awfully odd, because it
> autoloads nnir things, and nnir the requires gnus-sum, which just
> shouldn't work.
>
> I've now tried to resolve this, but as I couldn't reprodu
Teemu Likonen writes:
>> But just to double-check -- what's the value of `nnmail-expiry-target'
>> after you enter the nnml:old group?
>
> Its value is symbol named 'delete'.
Hm. What does the following return?
(gnus-group-find-parameter "nnml:old" 'expiry-target)
--
(domestic pets only, the
() Lars Ingebrigtsen
() Mon, 30 Jan 2012 17:13:07 +0100
> expanded set:
Sure, but that's pretty annoying to have to do.
Agreed. Hence, "kludge".
___
info-gnus-english mailing list
info-gnus-english@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinf
* Lars Ingebrigtsen [2012-01-30 17:21:23 +0100] wrote:
> Teemu Likonen writes:
>>> But just to double-check -- what's the value of
>>> `nnmail-expiry-target' after you enter the nnml:old group?
>>
>> Its value is symbol named 'delete'.
>
> Hm. What does the following return?
>
> (gnus-group-find-
Teemu Likonen writes:
> But. I started using Emacs 24 recently and so far I haven't seen this
> expiry loop anymore. Maybe there was some bug but it was accidentally
> fixed. Has there been any related changes in Gnus?
Lots and lots of changes. But I can't recall whether there were any
expiry-r
