島鉄雄 wrote: > 島鉄雄です。 > Peter Faust <peter.faust-solin...@t-online.de> in > <8760jiafkp....@peter.faust-solingen.dialin.t-online.de> writes: > >> Hello together! >> >> A few Gnus-users are interested in changing the cancel-lock from sha1: >> to sha-256 or sha-512 for News/Postings with Gnus. >> >> I found canlock.el for this function, and i hope someone can help me >> to change this. >> >> If this is not possible, please have a look at the following draft and >> think about it, please: >> >> From: Michael Bäuerle <michael.baeue...@stz-e.de> >> Newsgroups: news.software.nntp >> Subject: New draft for Cancel-Lock (Version 01) (was: New draft for >> Cancel-Lock) >> Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2017 14:11:06 +0100 >> Message-ID: <aabywalqd4maaae+.a1.fln...@wstation5.stz-e.de> >> >> To view the draft in web: >> http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?STYPE=msgid&A=0&MSGI=%3CAABYwALqD4MAAAe%2B.A1.flnews%40WStation5.stz-e.de%3E >> >> Greetings, Peter >> >> P.S.: Several discussions about this are running in the german group >> de.comm.software.newsserver, and, of course, in news.software.nntp > > Just out of curiosity: why do you have three different Cancel-Locks? I > thought there should be only two of them, one created by client and other > one created by injecting server.
Thats correct. But i am using a local proxy named "Hamster" to pull News and Mails from several Servers. And this proxy generates an additional cancel-lock. In my post is one cancel-lock from Gnus, one from local proxy, and one from my injecting Newsserver. Greeting, Peter -- ˙˙˙ɹǝʇıǝʍ puǝzɥɔnʃɥɔs ǝʇʃıǝɟ pun uǝuıǝʍ nz uɐ ƃuıɟ ǝıS ˙ʇǝuǝs∩ ɯǝp snɐ sƃuıʇsoԀ ɹɐɐd uıǝ soʃʇɹoʍ ɹɥı ǝʇƃıǝz ɥɔI ¿ʃǝƃǝɐussnℲ ǝɯɯnɹʞ os ɥɔıʃʇuǝƃıǝ ǝıS uǝqɐɥ osǝıM :ɹıɯ nz ǝʇuɐʇǝɹǝnʞıpǝԀ ǝuıǝɯ ǝʇuıǝɯ suǝʇzʇǝ˥ _______________________________________________ info-gnus-english mailing list info-gnus-english@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-gnus-english