Re: ‘Reply’ vs ‘followup’

2020-07-10 Thread Rafi Khan
Hi, Thank you for the thorough explanation. It has been very helpful. > Then you have to mark newsgroups that are really mailing lists first. You > can do that on one by one basis by setting ‘to-list’ parameter on them — Iʼve > already explained how to do that [1], but really you want to mark

Re: ‘Reply’ vs ‘followup’

2020-07-10 Thread Adam Sjøgren via info-gnus-english
Dmitry writes: > As for ‘f’ and ‘F’, they do _not_ stay for ‘forwarding’, but for > ‘following-up’. Contrary to what @a...@koldfront.dk have said [0], > they are _not_ for posting to [news]group only, This is what I wrote: For newsgroups (e.g. Gmane) R sends to the author only, and F sends to

Re: ‘Reply’ vs ‘followup’

2020-07-10 Thread Alberto Luaces
Dmitry Alexandrov writes: > Rafi Khan wrote: >> Alberto Luaces writes: >> 1. I am using Gmail as the backend and received Dmitry Alexandrov's reply in >> my inbox, but for some reason your reply wasn't there. > > He have not addressed you for some reason, cf. ‘To’ and (absent) ‘Cc’ headers >

Re: ‘Reply’ vs ‘followup’ (was: Test email)

2020-07-10 Thread Dmitry Alexandrov
Rafi Khan wrote: > Alberto Luaces writes: > 1. I am using Gmail as the backend and received Dmitry Alexandrov's reply in > my inbox, but for some reason your reply wasn't there. He have not addressed you for some reason, cf. ‘To’ and (absent) ‘Cc’ headers in his mail. While they are merely in