Eric Abrahamsen e...@ericabrahamsen.net writes:
Hi Eric,
No, I'm an idiot. It was a red herring -- looking at the wrong groups
at the wrong time. The actual problem seems to be that thread sorting
works correctly in all groups except my mail.* groups. Works right
in nnmairix groups and my
Eric Abrahamsen e...@ericabrahamsen.net writes:
Is there a chance that you've set a different sorting strategy in the
group you used for testing (e.g., as a group parameter which might
end up in ~/.newsrc.eld)? What does `C-h v
gnus-thread-sort-functions' in that wrongly sorted summary tell?
On Thu, Jul 12 2012, Tassilo Horn wrote:
Eric Abrahamsen e...@ericabrahamsen.net writes:
Is there a chance that you've set a different sorting strategy in the
group you used for testing (e.g., as a group parameter which might
end up in ~/.newsrc.eld)? What does `C-h v
Eric Abrahamsen e...@ericabrahamsen.net writes:
Hi Eric,
Now the remaining, minor mystery is, what's the difference between
this in my .emacs:
(custom-set-variables
'(gnus-thread-sort-functions
(quote (gnus-thread-sort-by-number
(not gnus-thread-sort-by-most-recent-date
and
On Thu, Jul 12 2012, Tassilo Horn wrote:
Eric Abrahamsen e...@ericabrahamsen.net writes:
Hi Eric,
Now the remaining, minor mystery is, what's the difference between
this in my .emacs:
(custom-set-variables
'(gnus-thread-sort-functions
(quote (gnus-thread-sort-by-number
(not
* F. Durand fdur...@gmail.com in gnu.emacs.gnus:
I've concluded that the state of a thread is the state of its first message.
Thus, if you have an old thread with a new message, you won't remark it.
It depends on the sorting function you choose... I am using this setting
(for mails; for news I
F. Durand fdur...@gmail.com writes:
Hi,
I've switched to gnus 3 months ago, and I'm very disturbed by the way
threads are sorted.
I've read this many times: http://gnus.org/manual/gnus_91.html
I've concluded that the state of a thread is the state of its first
message.
By default, Gnus
On Wed, Jul 11 2012, Tassilo Horn wrote:
F. Durand fdur...@gmail.com writes:
Hi,
I've switched to gnus 3 months ago, and I'm very disturbed by the way
threads are sorted.
I've read this many times: http://gnus.org/manual/gnus_91.html
I've concluded that the state of a thread is the
Eric Abrahamsen e...@ericabrahamsen.net writes:
Hi Eric,
Okay, but this doesn't actually work as advertised… I've got:
gnus-thread-sort-functions - ((not gnus-thread-sort-by-most-recent-date))
You should always include `gnus-thread-sort-by-number' in the list,
probably as first (least
On Wed, Jul 11 2012, Tassilo Horn wrote:
Eric Abrahamsen e...@ericabrahamsen.net writes:
Hi Eric,
Okay, but this doesn't actually work as advertised… I've got:
gnus-thread-sort-functions - ((not gnus-thread-sort-by-most-recent-date))
You should always include `gnus-thread-sort-by-number'
Eric Abrahamsen e...@ericabrahamsen.net writes:
Okay, I added that in, but it didn't make any difference. I eval
gnus-thread-sort-function:
(gnus-thread-sort-by-number (not gnus-thread-sort-by-most-recent-date))
That's what it gives me.
Strange, I'm running today's git gnus, but it has
On Thu, Jul 12 2012, Tassilo Horn wrote:
Eric Abrahamsen e...@ericabrahamsen.net writes:
Okay, I added that in, but it didn't make any difference. I eval
gnus-thread-sort-function:
(gnus-thread-sort-by-number (not gnus-thread-sort-by-most-recent-date))
That's what it gives me.
Strange,
* Eric Abrahamsen e...@ericabrahamsen.net in gnu.emacs.gnus:
I've also got:
gnus-sort-gathered-threads-function - gnus-thread-sort-by-date
Which I'd think was correct.
If no one else sees this it must be something I did, but I can't imagine what!
The default value for this one is
Hello all,
I've switched to gnus 3 months ago, and I'm very disturbed by the way
threads are sorted.
I've read this many times: http://gnus.org/manual/gnus_91.html
I've concluded that the state of a thread is the state of its first message.
Thus, if you have an old thread with a new message,
14 matches
Mail list logo
