Re: Follow-Ups and multiple groups?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 jgarcia...@alumno.uned.es (José Manuel García-Patos) writes: >>> Not really, no. I think testing should be done in dedicated test groups >>> only, regardless of whether you test within a thread or create a new >>> one. >> I knew no other test group av

Re: Follow-Ups and multiple groups?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Test6 - -- Merciadri Luca See http://www.student.montefiore.ulg.ac.be/~merciadri/ - -- You find out who your real friends are when you're involved in a scandal. (Elizabeth Taylor) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Com

Re: Follow-Ups and multiple groups?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 a...@koldfront.dk (Adam Sjøgren) writes: > On Sat, 08 May 2010 22:11:28 +0200, Merciadri wrote: > >> Sorry Adam for being not precise. > > No worries :-) :-) >> I tested with linux.debian.user and comp.sys.hp48, together. > > Both on news.dotsrc.org,

Re: Follow-Ups and multiple groups?

On Sat, 08 May 2010 22:11:28 +0200, Merciadri wrote: > Sorry Adam for being not precise. No worries :-) > I tested with linux.debian.user and comp.sys.hp48, together. Both on news.dotsrc.org, or? > It might be because they both exist to the news-gate, but would it be > that? I still don't qui

Re: Follow-Ups and multiple groups?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Sorry Adam for being not precise. a...@koldfront.dk (Adam Sjøgren) writes: > On Sat, 08 May 2010 15:20:48 +0200, Merciadri wrote: > >> I am still unable to say why it does not work for the two groups given >> in the OP. > > What groups was that? > >

Re: Follow-Ups and multiple groups?

On Sat, 08 May 2010 15:16:13 +0200, Merciadri wrote: > This is a test. Should be sent to dk.test too. Please don't use this group for testing. Thanks. Best regards, Adam -- "we push onward. to you, it is 2005, to us, it isAdam Sjøgren 2011. we are always far ahead."

Re: Follow-Ups and multiple groups?

On Sat, 08 May 2010 15:20:48 +0200, Merciadri wrote: > I am still unable to say why it does not work for the two groups given > in the OP. What groups was that? In the original article you wrote: "Let's say that I need to post some message on two groups on usenet, say hierarchy.group1 & hi

Re: Follow-Ups and multiple groups?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I just received an acknowledgment e-mail telling me that the message on dk.test was received correctly. The problem seems then to appear only when I am cross-posting on the two groups given in the OP. Strange. Do not hesitate to ask me if you have othe

Re: Follow-Ups and multiple groups?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 a...@koldfront.dk (Adam Sjøgren) writes: > Do you get any error messages? No, everything happens as habitually on my end: the same sending messages, everything looks right, but nothing is actually posted. > Perhaps the administrator of the > news-ser

Re: Follow-Ups and multiple groups?

92.168.0.101:55801 -> 130.225.254.104:119 [A] Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.gnus,dk.test..Subject: Re: Follow-Ups and multiple groups?..References: <87fx2366mv@merciadriluca-station.merciadriluca> <87pr17bmxy@topper.koldfront.dk> <878w7vxvcf@merciadriluca-station

Re: Follow-Ups and multiple groups?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 This is a test. Should be sent to dk.test too. - -- Merciadri Luca See http://www.student.montefiore.ulg.ac.be/~merciadri/ - -- Instruction ends in the schoolroom, but education ends only with life. (F. W. Robertson) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: Follow-Ups and multiple groups?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 a...@koldfront.dk (Adam Sjøgren) writes: Same test. - -- Merciadri Luca See http://www.student.montefiore.ulg.ac.be/~merciadri/ - -- When love and skill work together, expect a masterpiece. (John Ruskin) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuP

Re: Follow-Ups and multiple groups?

On Fri, 07 May 2010 23:20:16 +0200, Merciadri wrote: > Okay. But giving nothing for followups should not prevent Gnus from > sending the article to the precited groups, should it? Correct. >> What do you mean "it never works"? Descrive what happens... > What happens is simple: an article (/thre

Re: Follow-Ups and multiple groups?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 a...@koldfront.dk (Adam Sjøgren) writes: > On Fri, 07 May 2010 18:03:52 +0200, Merciadri wrote: > >> I then use `Newsgroups: ' and type `hiearchy.group1,hiearchy.group2' > >> * Why is Gnus repeatedly asking me if there are any follow-ups to my >> * me

Re: Follow-Ups and multiple groups?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 a...@koldfront.dk (Adam Sjøgren) writes: > On Fri, 07 May 2010 20:12:41 +0200, Adam wrote: > >> What do you mean "it never works"? Descrive what happens... >^ >b >

Re: Follow-Ups and multiple groups?

On Fri, 07 May 2010 20:12:41 +0200, Adam wrote: > What do you mean "it never works"? Descrive what happens... ^ b My followup to your article was crossposted to gnu.emacs.gnus and the Danish test-group dk.test,

Re: Follow-Ups and multiple groups?

On Fri, 07 May 2010 18:03:52 +0200, Merciadri wrote: > I then use `Newsgroups: ' and type `hiearchy.group1,hiearchy.group2' > * Why is Gnus repeatedly asking me if there are any follow-ups to my > * message? What are these? Gnus is asking you what group to put in the Followup-To header, which al

Follow-Ups and multiple groups?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, Let's say that I need to post some message on two groups on usenet, say hierarchy.group1 & hierarchy.group2. I then use `Newsgroups: ' and type `hiearchy.group1,hiearchy.group2' * Why is Gnus repeatedly asking me if there are any follow-ups to m