Ignore reply-to

2010-05-05 Thread Cecil Westerhof
In some e-mail clients it is possible to send a reply to the address in the From field, even when the Reply-to field is filled. Is this also possible in Gnus? Sometimes you want to reply to the original sender and not to the mailing list. -- Cecil Westerhof Senior Software Engineer LinkedIn: http

Re: Ignore reply-to

2010-05-05 Thread Cecil Westerhof
Gijs Hillenius writes: >> In some e-mail clients it is possible to send a reply to the address in >> the From field, even when the Reply-to field is filled. Is this also >> possible in Gnus? Sometimes you want to reply to the original sender and >> not to the mailing list. > > Yeah, of course thi

Re: Ignore reply-to

2010-05-05 Thread Gijs Hillenius
On 5 May 2010, Cecil Westerhof wrote: > In some e-mail clients it is possible to send a reply to the address in > the From field, even when the Reply-to field is filled. Is this also > possible in Gnus? Sometimes you want to reply to the original sender and > not to the mailing list. Yeah, of co

Re: Ignore reply-to

2010-05-06 Thread Bastien
Gijs Hillenius writes: > M-<, M-f, M-f, M-b, C-k, and you're good to go :-) C-c C-f C-t C-a C-k Not shorter, but cleaner ;) -- Bastien ___ info-gnus-english mailing list info-gnus-english@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-gnus-eng

Re: Ignore reply-to

2010-05-06 Thread David Kastrup
Cecil Westerhof writes: > In some e-mail clients it is possible to send a reply to the address > in the From field, even when the Reply-to field is filled. Is this > also possible in Gnus? Sometimes you want to reply to the original > sender and not to the mailing list. S B r (without quoting of

Re: Ignore reply-to

2010-05-06 Thread Cecil Westerhof
David Kastrup writes: >> In some e-mail clients it is possible to send a reply to the address >> in the From field, even when the Reply-to field is filled. Is this >> also possible in Gnus? Sometimes you want to reply to the original >> sender and not to the mailing list. > > S B r (without quoti

Re: Ignore reply-to

2010-05-06 Thread Gijs Hillenius
On 6 May 2010, Bastien wrote: > Gijs Hillenius writes: > >> M-<, M-f, M-f, M-b, C-k, and you're good to go :-) > > C-c C-f C-t C-a C-k > > Not shorter, but cleaner ;) Very nice! These moves are Gnus-specific, yes? ___ info-gnus-english mailing list

Re: Ignore reply-to

2010-05-06 Thread Bastien
Gijs Hillenius writes: >> Not shorter, but cleaner ;) > > Very nice! These moves are Gnus-specific, yes? Yes. Type C-c C-f C-h to get a full list of useful keybindings: , | C-c C-f C-a message-generate-unsubscribed-mail-followup-to | C-c C-f C-b message-goto-bcc | C-c C-f C-c messag

Re: Ignore reply-to

2010-05-07 Thread Reiner Steib
On Wed, May 05 2010, Cecil Westerhof wrote: > In some e-mail clients it is possible to send a reply to the address in > the From field, even when the Reply-to field is filled. Is this also > possible in Gnus? Sometimes you want to reply to the original sender and > not to the mailing list. See br

How to ignore "Reply-To"?

2008-10-18 Thread Teemu Likonen
How can I ignore Reply-To header when replying or (very-)wide-replying to a mail? Sometimes there's a need to overrule the Reply-To that was set by a mailing list software. ___ info-gnus-english mailing list info-gnus-english@gnu.org

Re: How to ignore "Reply-To"?

2008-10-18 Thread Pascal J. Bourguignon
Teemu Likonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > How can I ignore Reply-To header when replying or (very-)wide-replying > to a mail? Sometimes there's a need to overrule the Reply-To that was > set by a mailing list software. This is emacs, an editor! Just edit out whatever hea

Re: How to ignore "Reply-To"?

2008-10-18 Thread Sivaram Neelakantan
Teemu Likonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > How can I ignore Reply-To header when replying or (very-)wide-replying > to a mail? Sometimes there's a need to overrule the Reply-To that was > set by a mailing list software. Well, the Gnus default is sane when you're in a m

Re: How to ignore "Reply-To"?

2008-10-18 Thread Teemu Likonen
Sivaram Neelakantan [2008-10-18 22:17 +0530]: > Well, the Gnus default is sane when you're in a mailing list group in > that you typically reply to the list. That said, you could tinker with > `broken-reply-to' > Since the modification you wanted is infrequent, it's best to simply > edit the rep

Re: How to ignore "Reply-To"?

2008-10-18 Thread Reiner Steib
On Sat, Oct 18 2008, Teemu Likonen wrote: > Well, I guess this means that if I occasionally want to reply > privately to somebody on a mailing list I need to copy and paste > person's address to "To" field. All the reply options (normal, wide > and very wide) just reply to the list address and nob

Re: How to ignore "Reply-To"?

2008-10-18 Thread Teemu Likonen
Reiner Steib [2008-10-18 22:35 +0200]: > On Sat, Oct 18 2008, Teemu Likonen wrote: > >> Well, I guess this means that if I occasionally want to reply >> privately to somebody on a mailing list I need to copy and paste >> person's address to "To" field. All the reply options (normal, wide >> and ve

Re: How to ignore "Reply-To"?

2008-10-18 Thread John Hasler
Teemu Likonen writes: > Basically I'd like to have three different reply buttons: > 1. Reply to author only (with confirmation whether or not to honor the > possible Reply-To). > 2. Reply to all people. The original author's address (or at user > option, the Reply-To field) goes to "To"

Re: How to ignore "Reply-To"?

2008-11-10 Thread 0000 vk
> > OK, thanks. Well, I guess this means that if I occasionally want to > reply privately to somebody on a mailing list I need to copy and paste > person's address to "To" field. All the reply options (normal, wide and > very wide) just reply to the list address and nobody else. (setq message-mai

Re: How to ignore "Reply-To"?

2009-02-03 Thread Teemu Likonen
On 2008-10-19 00:54 (+0300), Teemu Likonen wrote: > In some mailing lists it's a convention that messages are posted always > to the list only (not "wide reply"). In such situations the list > software usually adds automatic "Reply-To: ". For me it's fine, > and I don't want to set broken-reply-to