Re: split-fancy-with-parent

2011-04-03 Thread Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
Vincent Beffara writes: > LMI> Could you repost the backtrace after doing the following? > LMI> (setq eval-expression-print-level 20) > LMI> (setq eval-expression-print-length 80) > > There you are - it didn't seem to change anything: > > , > | Debugger entered--Lisp error: (wrong-type-argume

Re: split-fancy-with-parent

2011-03-30 Thread Vincent Beffara
LMI> Could you repost the backtrace after doing the following? LMI> (setq eval-expression-print-level 20) LMI> (setq eval-expression-print-length 80) There you are - it didn't seem to change anything: , | Debugger entered--Lisp error: (wrong-type-argument stringp nil) | encode-coding-strin

Re: split-fancy-with-parent

2011-03-29 Thread Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
Vincent Beffara writes: > Here you go (rewrapped to make gnus happy): > > , > | Debugger entered--Lisp error: (wrong-type-argument stringp nil) > | encode-coding-string(nil utf-7-imap) Could you repost the backtrace after doing the following? (setq eval-expression-print-level 20) (setq ev

Re: split-fancy-with-parent

2011-03-24 Thread Vincent Beffara
VB> PS: BTW, now "B t" to test where a message would end up consistenty VB> answers "mail.misc" even on a message that was correctly split. And VB> respooling with "B r" fails saying VB> wrong type argument: stringp, nil VB> But I can live with that. TZ> I haven't looked at that code in a lng

Re: split-fancy-with-parent

2011-03-23 Thread Ted Zlatanov
On Wed, 23 Mar 2011 18:36:46 +0100 Vincent Beffara wrote: VB> Aha. So I did this: VB> , VB> | (setq gnus-select-method '(nnimap "local" VB> | (nnimap-address "localhost") VB> | (nnimap-stream network) VB> |

Re: split-fancy-with-parent

2011-03-23 Thread Vincent Beffara
TZ> The split rules changed in recent versions of No Gnus. I think they TZ> are only a server parameter now, so you have to modify your server TZ> definition. TZ> The `gnus-registry-split-fancy-with-parent' documentation is wrong TZ> (outdated, really). Sorry about that. I'm pretty sure you do

Re: split-fancy-with-parent

2011-03-23 Thread Ted Zlatanov
On Wed, 23 Mar 2011 19:41:38 +0800 Eric Abrahamsen wrote: EA> Vincent Beffara writes: Invariably when I run "B t" gnus tells me "this message would be split to INBOX" (but the "(: nnmail-split-fancy-with-parent)" does appear in the window). What am I missing here ? >> EA> I don

Re: split-fancy-with-parent

2011-03-23 Thread Eric Abrahamsen
Vincent Beffara writes: >>> Invariably when I run "B t" gnus tells me "this message would be >>> split to INBOX" (but the "(: nnmail-split-fancy-with-parent)" does >>> appear in the window). What am I missing here ? > > EA> I don't know if what you're doing is supposed to work or not, but > EA> I

Re: split-fancy-with-parent

2011-03-23 Thread Vincent Beffara
>> Invariably when I run "B t" gnus tells me "this message would be >> split to INBOX" (but the "(: nnmail-split-fancy-with-parent)" does >> appear in the window). What am I missing here ? EA> I don't know if what you're doing is supposed to work or not, but EA> I'm also using the registry, and I

Re: split-fancy-with-parent

2011-03-22 Thread Eric Abrahamsen
Vincent Beffara writes: > Hi there, > > [Apparently this is not the first time the question is asked ...] I > can't seem to make fancy splitting put mails with their parents, > ever. Which is sad because I have been looking for this feature for a > while in other mailers ! > > A few pieces of my