Ar an t-aonú lá déag de mí Iúil, scríobh Andrzej Adam Filip:
> > It's worse because it's
> > [1] much less widely implemented than UTF-8
>
> Which specific news readers support UTF-8 but no UTF-7?
Gnus on XEmacs is one.
--
Russian has no phoneme that corresponds directly to Germanic /h
On 11 Jul 2005 18:09:35 +0200, Andrzej wrote:
>> [2] less readable when the reader doesn't know it.
> ?! I disagree.
> UTF-7 uses only prinatable characters.
Here is an example:
Original text (iso-8859-1): Frække frølår
UTF8: Frække frølår
UTF7:
Jacob Sparre Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Andrzej Adam Filip <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I am under impression than UTF-7 is better suited for usenet posts
> > than UTF-8. What is your opinion?
>
> UTF-7 may be marginally better suited, but personally I prefer an
> appropriate fixed
Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Andrzej Adam Filip <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I am under impression than UTF-7 is better suited for usenet posts than
> > UTF-8. What is your opinion?
>
> It's worse because it's
> [1] much less widely implemented than UTF-8
Which spec
Andrzej Adam Filip <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am under impression than UTF-7 is better suited for usenet posts than
> UTF-8. What is your opinion?
It's worse because it's much less widely implemented than UTF-8, and
also less readable when the reader doesn't know it.
--
__("< Ma
Andrzej Adam Filip <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am under impression than UTF-7 is better suited for usenet posts
> than UTF-8. What is your opinion?
UTF-7 may be marginally better suited, but personally I prefer an
appropriate fixed-width encoding (in my case mostly ISO-8859-1).
Greetings,
J
How to set up UTF-7 encoding for non ASCI posts?
[ Thanks in advance for the links ]
I am under impression than UTF-7 is better suited for usenet posts than
UTF-8. What is your opinion?
--
Andrzej [en:Andrew] Adam Filip [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
All that is necessary for the triumph o
