When I reply to messages and cite the original, point ends up below the
citation line. This leads to weird threads, where my text ends up right
below the "so-and-so wrote:" line, and other people's mail programs
don't seem to do it that way. My message-citation-line-function is
currently set to mes
"G" == Gary writes:
G> Eric Abrahamsen wrote:
>> When I reply to messages and cite the original, point ends up below
>> the citation line. This leads to weird threads, where my text ends up
>> right below the "so-and-so wrote:" line
G> What do you mean? That you then type where the cursor is?
On Fri, Jan 21 2011, Philipp Haselwarter wrote:
> "G" == Gary writes:
>
> G> Eric Abrahamsen wrote:
>
>>> When I reply to messages and cite the original, point ends up below
>>> the citation line. This leads to weird threads, where my text ends up
>>> right below the "so-and-so wrote:" line
>
>
On Wed, Jan 19 2011, Eric Abrahamsen wrote:
> When I reply to messages and cite the original, point ends up below the
> citation line. This leads to weird threads, where my text ends up right
> below the "so-and-so wrote:" line, and other people's mail programs
> don't seem to do it that way.
Th
"G" == Gary writes:
G> Philipp Haselwarter wrote:
>> "G" == Gary writes:
>>
G> Eric Abrahamsen wrote:
>>
When I reply to messages and cite the original, point ends up below
the citation line. This leads to weird threads, where my text ends
up right below the "so-and-so wrote:"
Philipp Haselwarter writes:
> "G" == Gary writes:
>
> G> Eric Abrahamsen wrote:
>
>>> When I reply to messages and cite the original, point ends up below
>>> the citation line. This leads to weird threads, where my text ends up
>>> right below the "so-and-so wrote:" line
>
> G> What do you mean
---8<---[snipped 27 lines: everything :p]---8<---
Well I tend to leave in just the parts I'm directly answering/referring
to, which is usually the outermost level of citation. If someone wants
to follow a thread, he can do just that - read the thread.
When the whole conversation is quoted each tim
Philipp Haselwarter writes:
> ---8<---[snipped 27 lines: everything :p]---8<---
>
> Well I tend to leave in just the parts I'm directly answering/referring
> to, which is usually the outermost level of citation. If someone wants
> to follow a thread, he can do just that - read the thread.
> When
On Mon, Jan 24 2011, Philipp Haselwarter wrote:
> "G" == Gary writes:
>
> G> Philipp Haselwarter wrote:
>
>>> "G" == Gary writes:
>>>
> G> Eric Abrahamsen wrote:
>>>
> When I reply to messages and cite the original, point ends up below
> the citation line. This leads to weird threads,
Hi Philipp,
Philipp Haselwarter wrote:
> That's the point. Moving down manually every time is a bit of a pain if
> you just want to quote and start typing.
>
> ---8<---[snipped 19 lines]---8<---
I guess the above "elide" function is automatic. When pressing `C-h a', I see
I only have one version
* Sébastien Vauban in gnu.emacs.gnus:
> > ---8<---[snipped 19 lines]---8<---
> I guess the above "elide" function is automatic. When pressing `C-h a', I see
> I only have one version of it, the one (`message-elide-region') which inserts
> ellipsis. How do you get a line-count?
See these messages:
On Sat, Feb 26 2011,Damien Wyart wrote:
> * Sébastien Vauban in gnu.emacs.gnus:
>> > ---8<---[snipped 19 lines]---8<---
>> I guess the above "elide" function is automatic. When pressing `C-h a', I see
>> I only have one version of it, the one (`message-elide-region') which inserts
>> ellipsis. Ho
Sivaram Neelakantan writes:
> By coincidence, I'd mailed Lars to ask whether he could merge that
> patch into message.el. I'd recently installed stuff on a new machine
> and found that message-elide-region was not working for me. Turns out
> it's not applied to the file.
I've now added this to
13 matches
Mail list logo
