Peter Münster writes:
>> I think I set that header so my articles would not
>> be preserved in google groups for all eternity.
>
> Sure, XNAY prevents *your* articles from being
> archived. But anybody (except for Adam Sjøgren ;) can
> quote your text (or parts of your text taken out of
> context
On Sun, Aug 31 2014, David Hume wrote:
> I think I set that header so my articles would not be preserved in
> google groups for all eternity.
Sure, XNAY prevents *your* articles from being archived.
But anybody (except for Adam Sjøgren ;) can quote your text (or parts of
your text taken out of co
David Hume writes:
> OK maybe I am silly. I can't remember for certain,
> but I think I set that header so my articles would
> not be preserved in google groups for all eternity.
GG wont last for all eternity, but even if it it did,
what does it matter?
--
underground experts united
__
Emanuel Berg writes:
> Yeah, but are you sure this was set by the OP? He might
> be using some software that has that by default.
I don't know of any software that does - but of course, anything is
possible.
X-No-Archive is a quite well-established convention.
> Yeah - why shouldn't it be arch
a...@koldfront.dk (Adam Sjøgren) writes:
> Because I want to respect the wishes of the people I
> respond to.
Yeah, but are you sure this was set by the OP? He might
be using some software that has that by default.
> Also, I think setting X-No-Archive is kind of silly,
> if not asocial. This fun
Emanuel Berg writes:
>>> [Quoted text removed due to X-No-Archive]
> What does this mean?
It means that the article I was (not) quoting from had the X-No-Archive
header set, which indicates that the author doesn't want his words
archived - quoting them would go against that wish, so Gnus has
fu
On-topic: Even though you can use C-g in this an other
cases, it is likely you got yourself into either an
infinite loop or some computationally intense operation
and/or some operation applied to some huge material
(hence the seemingly infinite delay). The first case
(the infinite loop) is a bug an
David Hume writes:
> [Quoted text removed due to X-No-Archive]
Ah, I didn't know that one.
Thanks!
Adam
--
"FUTURE DIRECTIONS Adam Sjøgren
None." a...@koldfront.dk
__
David Hume writes:
> Aha! c-g actually stopped it hanging! I didn't know I could do that. OK next
> time...
Cool! C-g is the generic "ok, stop trying" thing in Emacs:
,[ C-h k C-g ]
| C-g runs the command keyboard-quit, which is an interactive compiled
| Lisp function in `simple.el'.
|
| I
On 2014-08-30, Adam Sjøgren wrote:
> David Hume writes:
>
>> Gnus is hanging again, showing a rotating wheel. How can I see what it is
>> doing? Is there a way to attach to the process and cause it to do backtrace,
>> before I kill it off?
>
> Maybe M-x toggle-debug-on-quit and then hit C-g when
David Hume writes:
> Gnus is hanging again, showing a rotating wheel. How can I see what it is
> doing? Is there a way to attach to the process and cause it to do backtrace,
> before I kill it off?
Maybe M-x toggle-debug-on-quit and then hit C-g when the wheel is spinning?
Best regards,
Gnus is hanging again, showing a rotating wheel. How can I see what it is
doing? Is there a way to attach to the process and cause it to do backtrace,
before I kill it off?
___
info-gnus-english mailing list
info-gnus-english@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org
12 matches
Mail list logo
