Please open a ticket in jira on extending the ip range, i guess we need to
handle ir soon
On May 12, 2016 8:58 PM, "Nadav Goldin" wrote:
> sure, added 4 more FC23 slaves, and on the way hit the IPs limit,
> had to remove some old unused testing VMs to release IPs.
> we have some useless leases t
>
> If we need that extra server in Production DC (for hosted engine
> redundancy and to allow maintenance) then lets take the lower end new
> servers from 17-26 and replace it with the strong one.
> We need to utilize our servers, I don't think we're at 50% utilization
> even, looking at the memor
sure, added 4 more FC23 slaves, and on the way hit the IPs limit,
had to remove some old unused testing VMs to release IPs.
we have some useless leases there such as an IP for each template,
though I'm not 100% sure if its safe to simply delete them from foreman
(they are saved as templates in the
>
> I was talking about using the hooks before installing the ssds, but if
> that can
> be done reliably also before the upgrade it's also a solution that will
> help
> scratch our current itches sooner.
>
That's about it. The hook in 3.6 contains the patch I submitted. It does
not work without it
ok I'll add also FC23, though I think the problem is the vdsm jobs, not sure
why they use only fc* instead of the el7 ones
On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 4:33 PM, David Caro wrote:
> On 05/12 12:46, Nadav Goldin wrote:
> > Hi, I added few more el7 slaves, there is a (relatively) new template
> > 'cento
On 05/12 15:49, Anton Marchukov wrote:
> Hello All.
>
> The fixed hook is only in 3.6. The hook version in 3.5 does not work.
> Although we can install the hook from 3.6 into 3.5 as it should be
> compatible and this is how it was done on the test slave.
I was talking about using the hooks before
On 05/12 16:50, Nadav Goldin wrote:
> ok I'll add also FC23, though I think the problem is the vdsm jobs, not sure
> why they use only fc* instead of the el7 ones
Thanks man, that's because (at least the check-merged) use libvirt to start up
vms, and trying to use libvirt from a fc23 chroot on an
Hello All.
The fixed hook is only in 3.6. The hook version in 3.5 does not work.
Although we can install the hook from 3.6 into 3.5 as it should be
compatible and this is how it was done on the test slave.
Also just to remind some drawbacks of that solution as it was:
1. It was not puppetized (n
On 05/11 18:44, Eyal Edri wrote:
> On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 6:27 PM, David Caro wrote:
>
> > On 05/11 18:21, Eyal Edri wrote:
> > > On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 5:36 PM, Nadav Goldin
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > > ovirt-srv11 host is in an empty cluster called 'Production_CentOS', its
> > > > qu
On 05/12 12:46, Nadav Goldin wrote:
> Hi, I added few more el7 slaves, there is a (relatively) new template
> 'centos72-jenkins-slave' in the Jenkins_CentOS cluster.
> iirc there was a discussion few months ago about our IPs limit, I think
> we're approaching that(there are
> 102 fixed addresses in
Hi, I added few more el7 slaves, there is a (relatively) new template
'centos72-jenkins-slave' in the Jenkins_CentOS cluster.
iirc there was a discussion few months ago about our IPs limit, I think
we're approaching that(there are
102 fixed addresses in foreman.phx.ovirt.org dhcpd server, and this
11 matches
Mail list logo
