[JIRA] (OVIRT-748) Fwd: Your message to Announce awaits moderator approval

sbonazzo created OVIRT-748: -- Summary: Fwd: Your message to Announce awaits moderator approval Key: OVIRT-748 URL: https://ovirt-jira.atlassian.net/browse/OVIRT-748 Project: oVirt - virtualization made easy

oVirt infra daily report - unstable production jobs - 92

Good morning! Attached is the HTML page with the jenkins status report. You can see it also here: - http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/system_jenkins-report/92//artifact/exported-artifacts/upstream_report.html Cheers, Jenkins upstream_report.html Description: Binary data __

Jenkins build became unstable: ovirt_4.0_he-system-tests #329

See ___ Infra mailing list Infra@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra

Build failed in Jenkins: ovirt_master_system-tests #591

See Changes: [Yaniv Kaul] Fix Hosted-Engine 3.6 suite. [Gil Shinar] Removed mistaken el6 -- [...truncated 687 lines...] ## took 2219 seconds ## rc = 1 #

Jenkins build is back to normal : ovirt_master_system-tests #590

See ___ Infra mailing list Infra@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra

[JIRA] (OVIRT-747) Server Error after signing out and signing back in

[ https://ovirt-jira.atlassian.net/browse/OVIRT-747?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Shlomo Ben David reassigned OVIRT-747: -- Assignee: Shlomo Ben David (was: infra) > Server Error after signing out and signing

[JIRA] (OVIRT-747) Server Error after signing out and signing back in

[ https://ovirt-jira.atlassian.net/browse/OVIRT-747?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Shlomo Ben David updated OVIRT-747: --- Epic Link: OVIRT-403 > Server Error after signing out and signing back in > -

[JIRA] (OVIRT-747) Server Error after signing out and signing back in

Shlomo Ben David created OVIRT-747: -- Summary: Server Error after signing out and signing back in Key: OVIRT-747 URL: https://ovirt-jira.atlassian.net/browse/OVIRT-747 Project: oVirt - virtualization m

Jenkins build is back to normal : ovirt_4.0_he-system-tests #327

See ___ Infra mailing list Infra@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra

Build failed in Jenkins: ovirt_master_system-tests #589

See Changes: [Yaniv Kaul] Enable ballooning on cluster -- [...truncated 682 lines...] ## took 2306 seconds ## rc = 1 ## #

Jenkins build is back to normal : ovirt_3.6_he-system-tests #489

See ___ Infra mailing list Infra@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra

Re: [ovirt-devel] [VDSM] All tests using directio fail on CI

Hello Yaniv. I don't do mock. And if I run everything in RAM (whether directly under > /dev/shm/ or in a zram disk), I honestly don't need the Linux > system cache. > >> >> Besides the possible difference in disk speeds I think the second factor >> is this Linux fs cache that basically create an a

Re: [ovirt-devel] [VDSM] All tests using directio fail on CI

On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 12:55 PM, Anton Marchukov wrote: > >> > The node will be offline for now until we agree on what to do. >> > An option is to abandon RAM disks completely as we didn't find >> > any performance benefits from using them so far. >> >> That's very surprising. On my case it doub

Build failed in Jenkins: ovirt_3.6_he-system-tests #488

See Changes: [Yaniv Kaul] Enable ballooning on cluster -- [...truncated 715 lines...] ## rc = 1 ## ##! ERROR v

Build failed in Jenkins: ovirt_4.0_he-system-tests #326

See Changes: [Yaniv Kaul] Enable ballooning on cluster -- [...truncated 1424 lines...] ## took 2594 seconds ## rc = 1 ##

Re: [ovirt-devel] [VDSM] All tests using directio fail on CI

> > > > The node will be offline for now until we agree on what to do. > > An option is to abandon RAM disks completely as we didn't find > > any performance benefits from using them so far. > > That's very surprising. On my case it doubles the performance, at least. > But I assume my storage (sin

Jenkins build is back to normal : ovirt_master_system-tests #588

See ___ Infra mailing list Infra@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra

Re: [ovirt-devel] [VDSM] All tests using directio fail on CI

On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 11:21 AM, Barak Korren wrote: > On 29 September 2016 at 11:08, Yaniv Kaul wrote: >> zram does not support direct IO (tested, indeed fails). >> What I do is host the VMs there, though - this is working - but I'm using >> Lago (and not oVirt). does oVirt need direct IO for t

Re: [ovirt-devel] [VDSM] All tests using directio fail on CI

On 29 September 2016 at 11:08, Yaniv Kaul wrote: > zram does not support direct IO (tested, indeed fails). > What I do is host the VMs there, though - this is working - but I'm using > Lago (and not oVirt). does oVirt need direct IO for the temp disks? I > thought we are doing them on the libvirt

[oVirt Jenkins] repos_master_check-closure_el7_merged - Build # 28 - Failure!

Project: http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/repos_master_check-closure_el7_merged/ Build: http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/repos_master_check-closure_el7_merged/28/ Build Number: 28 Build Status: Failure Triggered By: Started by timer - Changes Since Last Success: -

Re: [ovirt-devel] [VDSM] All tests using directio fail on CI

zram does not support direct IO (tested, indeed fails). What I do is host the VMs there, though - this is working - but I'm using Lago (and not oVirt). does oVirt need direct IO for the temp disks? I thought we are doing them on the libvirt level? This is the command I use: sudo modprobe zram num_

Re: [ovirt-devel] [VDSM] All tests using directio fail on CI

Hi Yaniv, this is a physical server with work directories created on a zRAM device, here's the patch: https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/62249/2/site/ovirt_jenkins_slave/templates/prepare-ram-disk.service.erb I'll still need to read up on this but the only slave having this class (ovirt-srv08) is now o

Re: [ovirt-devel] [VDSM] All tests using directio fail on CI

On Sep 29, 2016 10:28 AM, "Evgheni Dereveanchin" wrote: > > Hi, > > Indeed the proposed dd test does not work on zRAM slaves. > Can we modify the job not to run on nodes with ram_disk label? Are those zram based or ram based *virtio-blk* disks, or zram/ram disks within the VMs? The former should

Re: [ovirt-devel] [VDSM] All tests using directio fail on CI

Hi, Indeed the proposed dd test does not work on zRAM slaves. Can we modify the job not to run on nodes with ram_disk label? The node will be offline for now until we agree on what to do. An option is to abandon RAM disks completely as we didn't find any performance benefits from using them so fa

Build failed in Jenkins: ovirt_master_system-tests #587

See Changes: [Yaniv Kaul] ovirt-system-tests: small reposync for all suites. -- [...truncated 688 lines...] ## took 2301 seconds ## rc = 1 ##