On Sep 28, 2016 11:37 PM, "Nir Soffer" wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 11:20 PM, Nir Soffer wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 10:31 PM, Barak Korren
wrote:
> >> The CI setup did not change recently.
> >
> > Great
> >
> >> All standard-CI jobs run inside mock (chroot) which is stored on top
>
On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 11:39 PM, Yaniv Kaul wrote:
> On Sep 28, 2016 11:37 PM, "Nir Soffer" wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 11:20 PM, Nir Soffer wrote:
>> > On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 10:31 PM, Barak Korren
>> > wrote:
>> >> The CI setup did not change recently.
>> >
>> > Great
>> >
>> >> Al
Evgheni,
Can you try switching the current RAM drive with zram?
On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 11:43 PM, Nir Soffer wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 11:39 PM, Yaniv Kaul wrote:
> > On Sep 28, 2016 11:37 PM, "Nir Soffer" wrote:
> >>
> >> On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 11:20 PM, Nir Soffer
> wrote:
> >> > On
em so far.
Regards,
Evgheni Dereveanchin
- Original Message -
From: "Eyal Edri"
To: "Nir Soffer" , "Evgheni Dereveanchin"
Cc: "Yaniv Kaul" , "devel" , "infra"
Sent: Thursday, 29 September, 2016 8:08:45 AM
Subject: Re: [ovir
;
edere...@redhat.com>
> Cc: "Yaniv Kaul" , "devel" , "infra" <
infra@ovirt.org>
> Sent: Thursday, 29 September, 2016 8:08:45 AM
> Subject: Re: [ovirt-devel] [VDSM] All tests using directio fail on CI
>
> Evgheni,
> Can you try switching the current
hin
- Original Message -
From: "Yaniv Kaul"
To: "Evgheni Dereveanchin"
Cc: "infra" , "devel" , "Eyal Edri"
, "Nir Soffer"
Sent: Thursday, 29 September, 2016 9:32:45 AM
Subject: Re: [ovirt-devel] [VDSM] All tests using dire
gt; check what's going on but it must be something else than RAM disks.
>
> Regards,
> Evgheni Dereveanchin
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Yaniv Kaul"
> To: "Evgheni Dereveanchin"
> Cc: "infra" , "devel" , "Eyal Edri&quo
On 29 September 2016 at 11:08, Yaniv Kaul wrote:
> zram does not support direct IO (tested, indeed fails).
> What I do is host the VMs there, though - this is working - but I'm using
> Lago (and not oVirt). does oVirt need direct IO for the temp disks? I
> thought we are doing them on the libvirt
On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 11:21 AM, Barak Korren wrote:
> On 29 September 2016 at 11:08, Yaniv Kaul wrote:
>> zram does not support direct IO (tested, indeed fails).
>> What I do is host the VMs there, though - this is working - but I'm using
>> Lago (and not oVirt). does oVirt need direct IO for t
>
>
> > The node will be offline for now until we agree on what to do.
> > An option is to abandon RAM disks completely as we didn't find
> > any performance benefits from using them so far.
>
> That's very surprising. On my case it doubles the performance, at least.
> But I assume my storage (sin
On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 12:55 PM, Anton Marchukov
wrote:
>
>> > The node will be offline for now until we agree on what to do.
>> > An option is to abandon RAM disks completely as we didn't find
>> > any performance benefits from using them so far.
>>
>> That's very surprising. On my case it doub
Hello Yaniv.
I don't do mock. And if I run everything in RAM (whether directly under
> /dev/shm/ or in a zram disk), I honestly don't need the Linux
> system cache.
>
>>
>> Besides the possible difference in disk speeds I think the second factor
>> is this Linux fs cache that basically create an a
12 matches
Mail list logo
