Re: IPv6 RR disabled on lists.ovirt.org -- WHY???

Quack, On 05/26/2016 07:24 PM, Anton Marchukov wrote: > Based on the forwarded message and DNS checks I did everything should be > fine. The only thing is that have CNAME for mail server may not be a > good idea and it is better to make lists to be A and direct > records, reverses are

Re: IPv6 RR disabled on lists.ovirt.org -- WHY???

Hello All. Based on the forwarded message and DNS checks I did everything should be fine. The only thing is that have CNAME for mail server may not be a good idea and it is better to make lists to be A and direct records, reverses are already fine. As I see that's the plan so looks good.

Re: IPv6 RR disabled on lists.ovirt.org -- WHY???

Quack, Thanks dneary for coming to this thread. On 05/25/2016 04:24 AM, Karsten Wade wrote: > How about experimenting and see what happens (SCIENCE!), maybe with a > warning to the two main lists (devel, users) in case anything breaks? I'm in favor of experimenting too. I see no reason not to

Re: IPv6 RR disabled on lists.ovirt.org -- WHY???

Quack, On 05/25/2016 05:26 AM, Dave Neary wrote: > I do recall a thread about this now that Karsten mentions it... let me > go digging. IIRC, there was an issue around the entry... I have > found some emails from 2013 and a related ServiceNow ticket which, > apparently, has not survived the

Re: IPv6 RR disabled on lists.ovirt.org -- WHY???

I do recall a thread about this now that Karsten mentions it... let me go digging. IIRC, there was an issue around the entry... I have found some emails from 2013 and a related ServiceNow ticket which, apparently, has not survived the 3 year interval. Is the following context at all useful?

Re: IPv6 RR disabled on lists.ovirt.org -- WHY???

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 05/24/2016 01:32 AM, David Caro wrote: > Maybe it's old enough so Quaid was involved back then? I don't recall for sure why IPv6 would be turned off, but iirc we had problems with SPF for a few years for gmail.com users, meaning it affected the

Re: IPv6 RR disabled on lists.ovirt.org -- WHY???

Hi, That's "dneary", not dnary (explains why you couldn't find me, Duck). The lists.ovirt.org was set up originally by quaid. It used to be on an old box I think was retired - it used to be on the old resources.ovirt.org linode host. I have some email records of some general maintenance that

Re: IPv6 RR disabled on lists.ovirt.org -- WHY???

On 05/24 18:38, Marc Dequènes (Duck) wrote: > Quack, > > On 05/24/2016 05:32 PM, David Caro wrote: > > On 05/24 11:27, Eyal Edri wrote: > >> Misc,David? > > Misc is on PTO > > > I don't know, when was that done? > > > > Maybe it's old enough so Quaid was involved back then? or dnary? > >

Re: IPv6 RR disabled on lists.ovirt.org -- WHY???

Quack, On 05/24/2016 05:32 PM, David Caro wrote: > On 05/24 11:27, Eyal Edri wrote: >> Misc,David? Misc is on PTO > I don't know, when was that done? > > Maybe it's old enough so Quaid was involved back then? or dnary? Added Quaid, please help us. Who is dnary? Could not find this

Re: IPv6 RR disabled on lists.ovirt.org -- WHY???

On 05/24 11:27, Eyal Edri wrote: > Misc,David? I don't know, when was that done? Maybe it's old enough so Quaid was involved back then? or dnary? > > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 8:31 AM, Marc Dequènes (Duck) > wrote: > > > Quack, > > > > I'm having a look at OVIRT-357 and found

Re: IPv6 RR disabled on lists.ovirt.org -- WHY???

Misc,David? On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 8:31 AM, Marc Dequènes (Duck) wrote: > Quack, > > I'm having a look at OVIRT-357 and found that IPv6 was disabled for > Postfix as a workaround. > > It seems to me the IPv6 address should be added to the DNS RR (so that > SPF would allow this

IPv6 RR disabled on lists.ovirt.org -- WHY???

Quack, I'm having a look at OVIRT-357 and found that IPv6 was disabled for Postfix as a workaround. It seems to me the IPv6 address should be added to the DNS RR (so that SPF would allow this address too) and Postfix could have IPv6 reactivated. I see no other problem with other services on the