ins Security Advisory 2018-06-25
>
>
> Key: OVIRT-2262
> URL: https://ovirt-jira.atlassian.net/browse/OVIRT-2262
> Project: oVirt - virtualization made easy
> Issue Type: Task
Evgheni Dereveanchin created OVIRT-2262:
---
Summary: Apply fixes for Jenkins Security Advisory 2018-06-25
Key: OVIRT-2262
URL: https://ovirt-jira.atlassian.net/browse/OVIRT-2262
Project: oVirt
[
https://ovirt-jira.atlassian.net/browse/OVIRT-2199?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Evgheni Dereveanchin reassigned OVIRT-2199:
---
Assignee: Evgheni Dereveanchin (was: infra)
> Set content security pol
[
https://ovirt-jira.atlassian.net/browse/OVIRT-2199?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Daniel Belenky updated OVIRT-2199:
--
Labels: jenkins standard-ci stdci-summary (was: )
> Set content security policy at Jenk
[
https://ovirt-jira.atlassian.net/browse/OVIRT-2199?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Daniel Belenky updated OVIRT-2199:
--
Epic Link: OVIRT-403
> Set content security policy at Jenkins star
Daniel Belenky created OVIRT-2199:
-
Summary: Set content security policy at Jenkins startup
Key: OVIRT-2199
URL: https://ovirt-jira.atlassian.net/browse/OVIRT-2199
Project: oVirt - virtualization made
> Security: do we need HSTS for oVirt services?
> -
>
> Key: OVIRT-1231
> URL: https://ovirt-jira.atlassian.net/browse/OVIRT-1231
> Project: oVirt - virtualization made easy
> Is
[
https://ovirt-jira.atlassian.net/browse/OVIRT-1231?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
eyal edri updated OVIRT-1231:
-
Epic Link: (was: OVIRT-403)
> Security: do we need HSTS for oVirt servi
[
https://ovirt-jira.atlassian.net/browse/OVIRT-1231?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
eyal edri updated OVIRT-1231:
-
Epic Link: (was: OVIRT-403)
> Security: do we need HSTS for oVirt servi
Evgheni Dereveanchin created OVIRT-1912:
---
Summary: Apply fixes for Jenkins Security Advisory 2018-02-26
Key: OVIRT-1912
URL: https://ovirt-jira.atlassian.net/browse/OVIRT-1912
Project: oVirt
ins Security Advisory 2018-02-26
>
>
> Key: OVIRT-1912
> URL: https://ovirt-jira.atlassian.net/browse/OVIRT-1912
> Project: oVirt - virtualization made easy
> Issue Type: Task
Adding Duck who seems to be the owner of the repo.
On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 5:50 PM, Yaniv Kaul wrote:
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: GitHub
> Date: Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 5:48 PM
> Subject: [oVirt/openshift-status-cachet] One of your dependencies may
&g
-- Forwarded message --
From: GitHub
Date: Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 5:48 PM
Subject: [oVirt/openshift-status-cachet] One of your dependencies may have
a security vulnerability
To: oVirt/openshift-status-cachet <
openshift-status-cac...@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Security alert
Evgheni Dereveanchin created OVIRT-1718:
---
Summary: Apply fixes for Jenkins Security Advisory 2017-10-23
Key: OVIRT-1718
URL: https://ovirt-jira.atlassian.net/browse/OVIRT-1718
Project: oVirt
ins Security Advisory 2017-10-23
>
>
> Key: OVIRT-1718
> URL: https://ovirt-jira.atlassian.net/browse/OVIRT-1718
> Project: oVirt - virtualization made easy
> Issue Type: Bug
te:
>
> > Quack,
> >
> > So the news (thanks Misc for the alert):
> >
> > https://www.infineon.com/cms/en/product/promopages/rsa-
> > update/rsa-background
> >
> > This affects Yubikeys and other hardware:
> > https://www.yubico.c
ews (thanks Misc for the alert):
> > >
> > > https://www.infineon.com/cms/en/product/promopages/rsa-update/rsa
> > > -bac
> > > kground
> > >
> > > This affects Yubikeys and other hardware:
> > > https://www.yubico.com/support/security-a
/rsa-bac
> > kground
> >
> > This affects Yubikeys and other hardware:
> > https://www.yubico.com/support/security-advisories/ysa-2017-01/
> >
> > There's a nice tool to test if a key is vulnerable:
> > https://github.com/crocs-muni/roca
> >
&
; update/rsa-background
>
> This affects Yubikeys and other hardware:
> https://www.yubico.com/support/security-advisories/ysa-2017-01/
>
> There's a nice tool to test if a key is vulnerable:
> https://github.com/crocs-muni/roca
>
> I tested keys in the oVirt Puppet repo
ps://www.yubico.com/support/security-advisories/ysa-2017-01/
>
> There's a nice tool to test if a key is vulnerable:
> https://github.com/crocs-muni/roca
>
> I tested keys in the oVirt Puppet repository and none are affected.
>
> You may check your other keys and ensu
Quack,
So the news (thanks Misc for the alert):
https://www.infineon.com/cms/en/product/promopages/rsa-update/rsa-background
This affects Yubikeys and other hardware:
https://www.yubico.com/support/security-advisories/ysa-2017-01/
There's a nice tool to test if a key is vulnerable:
ins Security Advisory 2017-10-11
>
>
> Key: OVIRT-1695
> URL: https://ovirt-jira.atlassian.net/browse/OVIRT-1695
> Project: oVirt - virtualization made easy
> Issue Type: Bug
Evgheni Dereveanchin created OVIRT-1695:
---
Summary: Apply fixes for Jenkins Security Advisory 2017-10-11
Key: OVIRT-1695
URL: https://ovirt-jira.atlassian.net/browse/OVIRT-1695
Project: oVirt
too when all our vhosts are ready. And we must not create
new vhosts without HTTPS support even for testing. Here are my recommendations.
> Security: do we need HSTS for oVirt services?
> -
>
> Key: OVIRT-1231
>
this?
> Security: do we need HSTS for oVirt services?
> -
>
> Key: OVIRT-1231
> URL: https://ovirt-jira.atlassian.net/browse/OVIRT-1231
> Project: oVirt - virtualization made easy
>
eyal edri [Administrator] created OVIRT-1231:
Summary: Security: do we need HSTS for oVirt services?
Key: OVIRT-1231
URL: https://ovirt-jira.atlassian.net/browse/OVIRT-1231
Project: oVirt
[
https://ovirt-jira.atlassian.net/browse/OVIRT-1231?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
eyal edri [Administrator] updated OVIRT-1231:
-
Epic Link: OVIRT-403
> Security: do we need HSTS for oVirt servi
On 03/23 08:28, Eyal Edri wrote:
> FYI,
>
> Due to some error in the lists, some people might have been auto-subscribed
> to the secur...@ovirt.org list, while others were already subscribed
> without a reason (possibly spam joining by accident).
As far as I can tell, everyone that has been subsc
FYI,
Due to some error in the lists, some people might have been auto-subscribed
to the secur...@ovirt.org list, while others were already subscribed
without a reason (possibly spam joining by accident).
If you were unsubscribed and feel you should remain on the list, please
contact me in private
Il 22/01/2015 02:02, Karsten Wade ha scritto:
> Not sure who 'mvk' is, shouldn't this person know they're not in the
> sudoers file?
It was my fault, created the user yesterday to show Max Kovgan the release
process
>
> Forwarded Message
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Not sure who 'mvk' is, shouldn't this person know they're not in the
sudoers file?
- Forwarded Message ----
Subject: *** SECURITY information for linode01.ovirt.org ***
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 04:33:26 -0500 (EST)
> > Sent: Thursday, October 9, 2014 9:09:20 AM
> > > Subject: Re: [engineering.redhat.com #319333] Re: [Security]
> System job to deploy rpms
> > >
> > > Il 08/10/2014 18:18, Red Hat Product Security ha scritto:
> > > > On Wed Oct 08 08:35:15 2
On Thu Oct 09 00:09:25 2014, sbona...@redhat.com wrote:
> Il 08/10/2014 18:18, Red Hat Product Security ha scritto:
> > On Wed Oct 08 08:35:15 2014, sbona...@redhat.com wrote:
> >> Il 08/10/2014 12:02, Ohad Basan ha scritto:
> >>> Hello everyone.
> >>&g
; > for this I've sent this patch http://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/33863/
> > that will add the "resources" user. it will have permissions only
> for the static rpms directory and will scp the files to there.
> > is it acceptable by everybody security-wise?
> >
>
On 10/12, Eyal Edri wrote:
>
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Sandro Bonazzola"
> > To: secal...@redhat.com
> > Cc: secur...@ovirt.org, infra@ovirt.org
> > Sent: Thursday, October 9, 2014 9:09:20 AM
> > Subject: Re: [engineering
- Original Message -
> From: "Sandro Bonazzola"
> To: secal...@redhat.com
> Cc: secur...@ovirt.org, infra@ovirt.org
> Sent: Thursday, October 9, 2014 9:09:20 AM
> Subject: Re: [engineering.redhat.com #319333] Re: [Security] System job to
> deploy rpms
&
Il 08/10/2014 18:18, Red Hat Product Security ha scritto:
> On Wed Oct 08 08:35:15 2014, sbona...@redhat.com wrote:
>> Il 08/10/2014 12:02, Ohad Basan ha scritto:
>>> Hello everyone.
>>>
>>> I've created a small job (not yet enabled)
>>> that get
minutes.
I should have sent an email right after the update, but the upgrade went
smooth. If you notice any issues, please report them.
>
> >
> > Original Message
> > Subject: [foreman-announce] Foreman 1.5.1 security, bug fix and enhancement
> > up
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 03:30:52PM +0200, David Caro wrote:
> Maybe it's worth updating foreman
Given we already run 1.5.0 and I'm doing so now. Foreman may be
unavailable for a few minutes.
>
> Original Message
> Subject: [foreman-announce] Foreman 1.5.1
Maybe it's worth updating foreman
Original Message
Subject: [foreman-announce] Foreman 1.5.1 security, bug fix and enhancement
update
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 13:25:10 +0100
From: Dominic Cleal
Reply-To: foreman-users
To: foreman-announce ,foreman-users
Foreman
Le dimanche 08 juin 2014 à 02:55 -0400, Eyal Edri a écrit :
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Michael Scherer"
> > To: infra@ovirt.org
> > Sent: Friday, June 6, 2014 2:29:44 PM
> > Subject: infra security update
> >
> > Hi,
> &g
- Original Message -
> From: "Michael Scherer"
> To: infra@ovirt.org
> Sent: Friday, June 6, 2014 2:29:44 PM
> Subject: infra security update
>
> Hi,
>
> Due to CVE on openssl and on kernel, I did upgrade various piece of the
> infrastructur
Le vendredi 06 juin 2014 à 14:36 +0200, Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden a
écrit :
> On Fri, Jun 06, 2014 at 01:29:44PM +0200, Michael Scherer wrote:
> > Due to CVE on openssl and on kernel, I did upgrade various piece of the
> > infrastructure ( foreman, lists, stats, monitoring ), which implied a
> > f
On Fri, Jun 06, 2014 at 01:29:44PM +0200, Michael Scherer wrote:
> Due to CVE on openssl and on kernel, I did upgrade various piece of the
> infrastructure ( foreman, lists, stats, monitoring ), which implied a
> few reboots ( due to kernel lagging behind, which is not that great with
> local root
Hi,
Due to CVE on openssl and on kernel, I did upgrade various piece of the
infrastructure ( foreman, lists, stats, monitoring ), which implied a
few reboots ( due to kernel lagging behind, which is not that great with
local root exploit ). As this is friday and I assumed most of the Tel
Aviv offi
I did this for all jenkins slaves on rackspace* servers.
So +1 for the idea.
- Kiril
- Original Message -
> From: "Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden"
> To: infra@ovirt.org
> Sent: Wednesday, October 9, 2013 12:18:02 PM
> Subject: Re: Security
>
> On Wed, Oct
On Wed, Oct 09, 2013 at 10:41:36AM +0200, Vinzenz Feenstra wrote:
> I see again quite a lot of "POSSIBLE BREAK-IN ATTEMPT" alerts lately
> mainly originating from *hichina.com
>
> Could you guys please address this? Thanks
What do you think of disabling SSH passwords and use just SSH keys?
Fairly
Hi,
I see again quite a lot of "POSSIBLE BREAK-IN ATTEMPT" alerts lately
mainly originating from *hichina.com
Could you guys please address this? Thanks
On 10/09/2013 09:15 AM, logwa...@linode01.ovirt.org wrote:
SFTP subsystem requests: 2 Time(s)
**Unmatched Entries**
Address 198
ld the ISO domain.
A fix for this bug was pushed to gerrit:
http://gerrit.ovirt.org/19557
Security implications:
This bug allows local users escalate their privileges by editing
/etc/sysconfig/nfs
and waiting until the nfs service will be started/stopped (e.g. a reboot of the
machine)
fyi,
i've upgraded jenkins.ovirt.org to latest LTS version, due to security alert.
[1]
jenkins is now running 1.480.1
changelog:
What's new in 1.480.1 (2012/11/17)
FilePath.validateAntFileMask too slow for /configure (issue 7214)
java.io.InvalidClassException (issue 14667)
Log re
- Original Message -
> From: "Itamar Heim"
> To: "Robert Middleswarth"
> Cc: infra@ovirt.org
> Sent: Wednesday, August 1, 2012 5:01:10 PM
> Subject: Re: Security issues when running gerrit patches on jenkins
>
> On 08/01/2012 04:56 PM, Robert
On 08/01/2012 04:56 PM, Robert Middleswarth wrote:
On 08/01/2012 09:50 AM, Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden wrote:
On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 09:35:39AM -0400, Robert Middleswarth wrote:
On 08/01/2012 09:31 AM, Eyal Edri wrote:
Itamar Heim wrote:
wouldn't it be easier to maintain the whitelist via a g
On 08/01/2012 09:50 AM, Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden wrote:
On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 09:35:39AM -0400, Robert Middleswarth wrote:
On 08/01/2012 09:31 AM, Eyal Edri wrote:
Itamar Heim wrote:
wouldn't it be easier to maintain the whitelist via a git repo on
gerrit?
you mean instead of putting it o
- Original Message -
> From: "Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden"
> To: infra@ovirt.org
> Sent: Wednesday, August 1, 2012 4:50:03 PM
> Subject: Re: Security issues when running gerrit patches on jenkins
>
> On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 09:35:39AM -0400, Robert Middleswa
On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 09:35:39AM -0400, Robert Middleswarth wrote:
> On 08/01/2012 09:31 AM, Eyal Edri wrote:
> > Itamar Heim wrote:
> >> wouldn't it be easier to maintain the whitelist via a git repo on
> >> gerrit?
> >
> > you mean instead of putting it on a wiki page?
> > yes, make sense to ma
On 08/01/2012 04:35 PM, Robert Middleswarth wrote:
On 08/01/2012 09:31 AM, Eyal Edri wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Itamar Heim"
To: "Eyal Edri"
Cc: "Robert Middleswarth" , infra@ovirt.org
Sent: Wednesday, August 1, 2012 4:08:41 PM
Subject: Re
On 08/01/2012 09:31 AM, Eyal Edri wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Itamar Heim"
To: "Eyal Edri"
Cc: "Robert Middleswarth" , infra@ovirt.org
Sent: Wednesday, August 1, 2012 4:08:41 PM
Subject: Re: Security issues when running gerrit patches on jenkins
- Original Message -
> From: "Itamar Heim"
> To: "Eyal Edri"
> Cc: "Robert Middleswarth" , infra@ovirt.org
> Sent: Wednesday, August 1, 2012 4:08:41 PM
> Subject: Re: Security issues when running gerrit patches on jenkins
On 08/01/2012 02:56 PM, Eyal Edri wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Robert Middleswarth"
To: "Eyal Edri"
Cc: infra@ovirt.org
Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2012 8:35:25 PM
Subject: Re: Security issues when running gerrit patches on jenkins
On 07/31/2012 01:19
- Original Message -
> From: "Robert Middleswarth"
> To: "Eyal Edri"
> Cc: infra@ovirt.org
> Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2012 8:35:25 PM
> Subject: Re: Security issues when running gerrit patches on jenkins
>
> On 07/31/2012 01:19 PM, Eyal E
On 07/31/2012 01:19 PM, Eyal Edri wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Robert Middleswarth"
To: infra@ovirt.org
Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2012 7:55:49 PM
Subject: Re: Security issues when running gerrit patches on jenkins
On 07/31/2012 10:37 AM, Karsten 'quaid' Wad
- Original Message -
> From: "Robert Middleswarth"
> To: infra@ovirt.org
> Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2012 7:55:49 PM
> Subject: Re: Security issues when running gerrit patches on jenkins
>
> On 07/31/2012 10:37 AM, Karsten 'quaid' Wade wr
On 07/31/2012 10:37 AM, Karsten 'quaid' Wade wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/18/2012 04:05 AM, Eyal Edri wrote:> Hi,
Following last infra meeting, i want to open for discussion the
security issues that may arise if we allow Jenkins to run jobs (i.e
a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/18/2012 04:05 AM, Eyal Edri wrote:> Hi,
>
> Following last infra meeting, i want to open for discussion the
> security issues that may arise if we allow Jenkins to run jobs (i.e
> any code) with every gerrit patch.
>
> -
On 07/18/2012 11:47 PM, Karsten 'quaid' Wade wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/18/2012 10:00 AM, Robert Middleswarth wrote:
I am on the opposite side of this issue. Maybe I have been
attacked by 1 to many bot's or been a manager when someone I
know and trusted stole f
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/18/2012 10:00 AM, Robert Middleswarth wrote:
>> I am on the opposite side of this issue. Maybe I have been
>> attacked by 1 to many bot's or been a manager when someone I
>> know and trusted stole from the company. I need trust to be
>> earne
Am 18.07.2012 um 15:57 schrieb Heiko W.Rupp:
> That would match the pattern of not automatically running every
> submission directly on gerrit until they have proven that they
> know what they are doing.
Which is what they are used with not getting full commit access on day 1.
--
Reg. Adresse:
Am 18.07.2012 um 13:43 schrieb Mike Burns:
> It's not commit access that is being discussed. We're not giving that
> away easily. Jenkins provides the ability to trigger builds/tests on
> patch submission (just submission, not commit). A savvy attacker could
> write a patch that could cause the
- Original Message -
> From: "Robert Middleswarth"
> To: "Eyal Edri"
> Cc: "Mike Burns" , infra@ovirt.org
> Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2012 10:17:36 PM
> Subject: Re: Security issues when running gerrit patches on jenkins
On 07/18/2012 03:10 PM, Eyal Edri wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Mike Burns"
To: "Eyal Edri"
Cc: "Robert Middleswarth" , infra@ovirt.org
Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2012 8:45:05 PM
Subject: Re: Security issues when running gerrit patches on jenkin
- Original Message -
> From: "Mike Burns"
> To: "Eyal Edri"
> Cc: "Robert Middleswarth" , infra@ovirt.org
> Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2012 8:45:05 PM
> Subject: Re: Security issues when running gerrit patches on jenkins
>
>
On Wed, 2012-07-18 at 13:03 -0400, Eyal Edri wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Robert Middleswarth"
> > To: infra@ovirt.org
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2012 8:00:44 PM
> > Subject: Re: Security issues when running gerrit patches on
On Wed, 2012-07-18 at 13:34 -0400, Heiko W.Rupp wrote:
> Am 18.07.2012 um 13:00 schrieb Robert Middleswarth:
>
> > I need trust to be earned so I +1 on whitelist. With that said I think
> > getting on the whitelist should be pretty easy.
>
> Isn't that what you usually do on projects - have t
Am 18.07.2012 um 13:00 schrieb Robert Middleswarth:
> I need trust to be earned so I +1 on whitelist. With that said I think
> getting on the whitelist should be pretty easy.
Isn't that what you usually do on projects - have the first few commits not
directly go to master but being
reviewe
- Original Message -
> From: "Robert Middleswarth"
> To: infra@ovirt.org
> Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2012 8:00:44 PM
> Subject: Re: Security issues when running gerrit patches on jenkins
>
> On 07/18/2012 10:40 AM, Karsten 'quaid' Wade wr
On 07/18/2012 10:40 AM, Karsten 'quaid' Wade wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/18/2012 06:20 AM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 07:05:16AM -0400, Eyal Edri wrote:
Hi,
Following last infra meeting, i want to open for discussion the
security i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/18/2012 06:20 AM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 07:05:16AM -0400, Eyal Edri wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Following last infra meeting, i want to open for discussion the
>> security issues that may arise if w
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 07:05:16AM -0400, Eyal Edri wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Following last infra meeting, i want to open for discussion the security
> issues that may arise if we allow Jenkins
> to run jobs (i.e any code) with every gerrit patch.
>
> The problem:
>
>
Hi,
Following last infra meeting, i want to open for discussion the security issues
that may arise if we allow Jenkins
to run jobs (i.e any code) with every gerrit patch.
The problem:
In theory, any user that is registered to gerrit might send a patch to any
ovirt project.
That code might
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 12:26:43PM -0800, Karsten 'quaid' Wade wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 01/19/2012 09:46 AM, Petr Matousek wrote:
> > Hi Karsten,
> >
> > we have a wiki page describing ovirt.org security mailing lists
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/19/2012 09:46 AM, Petr Matousek wrote:
> Hi Karsten,
>
> we have a wiki page describing ovirt.org security mailing lists
> [1], but I think we should at least mention the security mailing
> lists and how we handle securit
On 01/19/2012 06:59 PM, David Jorm wrote:
> On 01/20/2012 03:46 AM, Petr Matousek wrote:
>> Hi Karsten,
>>
>> we have a wiki page describing ovirt.org security mailing lists [1], but
>> I think we should at least mention the security mailing lists and how we
>&
On 01/20/2012 03:46 AM, Petr Matousek wrote:
Hi Karsten,
we have a wiki page describing ovirt.org security mailing lists [1], but
I think we should at least mention the security mailing lists and how we
handle security issues on our community page [2].
[1] http://ovirt.org/wiki/Security
Hi Karsten,
we have a wiki page describing ovirt.org security mailing lists [1], but
I think we should at least mention the security mailing lists and how we
handle security issues on our community page [2].
[1] http://ovirt.org/wiki/Security
[2] http://www.ovirt.org/project/community/
In
84 matches
Mail list logo
