Re: removing 3.6.2 jobs

2016-01-14 Thread Eyal Edri
OK. On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 2:31 PM, Sandro Bonazzola wrote: > > > On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 10:07 AM, Eyal Edri wrote: > >> My question was why do we need the build artifacts for e.g? >> I'm OK with the check-patch jobs that verify compilation for e.g, but are >> we using the 3.6.2 build artifac

Re: removing 3.6.2 jobs

2016-01-14 Thread Sandro Bonazzola
On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 10:07 AM, Eyal Edri wrote: > My question was why do we need the build artifacts for e.g? > I'm OK with the check-patch jobs that verify compilation for e.g, but are > we using the 3.6.2 build artifacts jobs? > I'm using it for releasing engine and for getting engine rpms

Re: removing 3.6.2 jobs

2016-01-13 Thread Eyal Edri
My question was why do we need the build artifacts for e.g? I'm OK with the check-patch jobs that verify compilation for e.g, but are we using the 3.6.2 build artifacts jobs? e. On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 9:59 AM, Sandro Bonazzola wrote: > > > On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 8:22 AM, Eyal Edri wrote: > >

Re: removing 3.6.2 jobs

2016-01-12 Thread Sandro Bonazzola
On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 8:22 AM, Eyal Edri wrote: > I can't recall which 3.6.2 jobs we said we'll keep and which we'll drop. > IIRC, we don't need the build artifacts jobs [1] > > Tal, you mentioned there were some jobs you do want to see running on the > version branch, > Do you recall which? >

removing 3.6.2 jobs

2016-01-12 Thread Eyal Edri
I can't recall which 3.6.2 jobs we said we'll keep and which we'll drop. IIRC, we don't need the build artifacts jobs [1] Tal, you mentioned there were some jobs you do want to see running on the version branch, Do you recall which? I remind that running these temporarily jobs is an overhead sinc